
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.510515 广州,南方医科大学研究生院
2.510515 广州,广州军区广州总医院眼科
[邹玉平,E-mail:gzzouyuping@163.comZOU Yuping, E-mail: gzzouyuping@163.com
收稿:2017-10-19,
修回:2017-12-11,
纸质出版:2018-03-15
移动端阅览
赵抒羽, 邹玉平. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者干眼发生率及原因探讨[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(5):437-442.
Shuyu ZHAO, Yuping ZOU. Incidence and etiological analysis of dry eye in diabetic retinopathy patients[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(5): 437-442.
赵抒羽, 邹玉平. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者干眼发生率及原因探讨[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018,40(5):437-442. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201710128.
Shuyu ZHAO, Yuping ZOU. Incidence and etiological analysis of dry eye in diabetic retinopathy patients[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(5): 437-442. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201710128.
目的
2
观察糖尿病视网膜病变患者发生干眼的情况,并探讨造成干眼的原因。
方法
2
收集2016年1月1日至10月1日在广州军区广州总医院内分泌科确诊为2型糖尿病患者共72例144眼。根据视网膜造影评估的糖尿病视网膜病变程度分组,A组:增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变40例,B组:非增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变32例;另以同期健康体检者36例为对照组(C组)。对比各组间主观症状、SchirmerⅠtest(SⅠT)、非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(non-invasive break-up time,NIBUT)、脂质层分级、印迹细胞的差异。
结果
2
糖尿病患者干眼发生率为61.1%,非增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变患者干眼的发生率为50.0%,增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变患者干眼的发生率为70.0%,非增殖期糖尿病视网膜病与干眼发生有相关性(
OR
=17.00),而增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变患者与干眼发生呈明显正相关(
OR
=57.29);眼表疾病指数(ocular surface disease index
OSDI)问卷得分A组为(64.32±1.00)
B组为(28.45±1.10),C组为(13.54±0.90)
各组两两比较差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001)。A组NIBUT为(5.90±2.28)s,B组为(7.58±2.15)s,C组为(11.55±2.25)s,各组两两比较差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001);A组SⅠT为(7.75±2.03)mm,B组为(8.75±1.98)mm,C组为(10.78±2.21)mm,A、B两组与C组相比差异有统计学意义(
P
=0.016,
P
<
0.001);A组杯状细胞数为(59.00±5.18)个,B组为(67.50±3.93)个,C组为(80.94±8.87)个,各组两两比较差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.001)。
结论
2
糖尿病患者较正常人易发生干眼,增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变患者较非增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变干眼症状明显,泪膜功能稳定性下降,容易造成眼部干涩异物感。
Objective
2
To observe the incidence and clinical presentation of dry eye in patients with diabetic retinopathy
and analyze the possible causes.
Methods
2
A total of 72 patients (144 eyes) with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted in the endocrinological department of the General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command from January 1 to October 1
2016 were recruited in this study. According to the severity of diabetic retinopathy by retinography
they were divided into proliferative diabetic retinopathy group (PDR
n
=40) and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy group (NPDR
n
=32)
and another 36 health individuals served as normal control. Subjective symptoms
Results of Schirmer Ⅰ test (SⅠT)
non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT)
lipid layer classification and impression cytology were com
pared among the 3 groups.
Results
2
Among the 72 diabetic patients
the total incidence rate of dry eye was 61.1%
and the incidence was 50.0% for the NPDR group and 70.0% for the PDR. Dry eye was associated with NPDR (
OR
=17.00)
and positively correlated with PDR (
OR
=57.29). The score of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire was 64.32±1.00
28.45±1.10 and 13.54±0.90
respectively
for the PDR group
NPDR group and healthy subjects
with significant difference between any 2 groups (
P
<
0.001). NIBUT was 5.90±2.28
7.58±2.15 and 11.55±2.25 s
respectively in the above 3 groups (
P
<
0.001). The Results of SⅠT was 7.75±2.03
8.75±1.98 and 10.78±2.21 mm
respectively
with significant differences in PDR group and NPDR group with the control group (
P
=0.016
P
<
0.001). The number of goblet cells were 59.00±5.18
67.50±3.93 and 80.94±8.87
respectively (
P
<
0.001).
Conclusion
2
The diabetic patients are prone to dry eye than healthy individual. The PDR patients have more obvious dry eye symptoms than the NPDR patients
with declined stability of tear film and thus susceptible to eye dryness and foreign body sensation.
SHAW J E, SICREE R A, ZIMMER P Z. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2010, 87(1): 4-14.DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007.
LI X M, HU L, WANG W. Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery[J]. Cornea, 2007, 26(9 Suppl 1): S16-S20.
OZCURA F, AYDIN S, HELBACI M R. Ocular surface disease index for the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome[J]. Ocul Immunol inflamm, 2007, 15(5):389-393. DOI:10.1080/ 09273940701486803.
WHITCHER J P, SHIBOSKI C H, SHIBOSKI S C, et al .A simplified quantitative method for assessing keratoconjunctivitis sicca from the Sjögren's syndrome international registry[J ] . Am J Ophthalmol, 2010, 149(3): 405-415.DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.013.
NELSON J D. Impression cytology[J]. Cornea, 1988, 7(1):71-81.
中华医学会眼科分会角膜学组.干眼临床诊疗专家共识(2013年)[J].中华眼科杂志, 2013, 49(1):73-75. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2013.020.
Chinese medical association ophthalmic branch corneal group. Expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment of dry eyes(2013)[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol, 2013, 49(1):73-75.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2013.020.
袁进, 陈家祺.加强和规范干眼的临床研究[J].眼科, 2010, 19(3):148-149.
YUAN J, CHEN J Q. Strengthen and standardize clinical study of dry eye[J]. Ophthalmol CHN, 2010, 19(3):148-149.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, KNOWLER W C, FOWLER S E, et al .10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the diabetes prevention program outcomes study[J ] . Lancet, 2009, 374(9702): 1677-1686.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4.
喻建峰, 宋愈, 朱妍, 等.2型糖尿病患者干眼与糖尿病视网膜病变的相关分析[J].国际眼科杂志, 2016, 16(6):1187-1189.DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.6.51.
YU J F, SONG Y, ZHU Y, et al . Analysis of correlation between dry eye and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients[J ] . Int Eye Sci, 2016, 16(6):1187-1189. DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2016.6.51.
李婷, 宋艳.2型糖尿病患者泪膜功能变化的临床研究[J].中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2015(4):202-204. DOI:10.3877/cma.Jissn.2095-2007.2015.04.007.
LI T, SONG Y. Changes in the tear film function in patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Med(Electr Ed), 2015(4):202-204.DOI:10.3877/cma.Jissn.2095-2007.2015.04.007.
MANAVIAT M R, RASHIDI M, AFKHAMI-ARDEKANI M, et al . Prevalence of dry eye syndrome and diabetic retino-pathy in type 2 diabetic patients[J ] . BMC Ophthalmol, 2008, 8:10.DOI:10.1186/1471-2415-8-10.
ALVES M, CALEGART V C, CUNHA D A, et al . Increased expression of advanced glycation end-products and their receptor, and activation of nuclear factor kappa-B in lacrimal glands of diabetic rats[J ] . Diabetologia, 2005, 48(12):2675-2681. DOI:10.1007/s00125-005-0010-9.
高妍, 刘新玲, 李筱荣.糖尿病患者眼表及泪液蛋白改变的临床分析[J].眼科新进展, 2011, 31(3):267-270.
GAO Y, LIU X L, LI X R.Clinical analysis of ocular surface and tear changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Rec Adv Ophthalmol, 2011, 31(3):267-270.
INOUE K, KATO S, OHARA C, et al .Ocular and systemic factors relevant to diabetic keratoepitheliopathy[J ] . Conea, 200l, 20(8):798-801.
蔡伟浩, 彭玲, 陆晓和, 等.Omega-3治疗干眼的研究进展[J].眼科新进展, 2016, 36(4):377-379, 385. DOI:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0103.
CAI W H, PENG L, LU X H, et al .Recent advance in omega-3 for dry eye[J ] . Rec Adv Ophthalmol, 2016, 36(4):377-379, 385. DOI:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2016.0103.
GüRDAL C, GENÇ I, SARAÇ O, et al .Topical cyclosporine in thyroid orbitopathy-related dry eye: clinical findings, conjunctival epithelial apoptosis, and MMP-9 expression[J ] . Curr Eye Res, 2010, 35(9):771-777. DOI:10.3109/02713683.2010.490320.
IMAM S, ELAGIN R B, JAUME J C.Diabetes-associated dry eye syndrome in a new humanized transgenic model of type 1 diabetes[J]. Mol Vis, 2013, 19:1259-1267.
LIU L, WU J, YUE S, et al . Incidence density and disk factors of diabetic retinopathy within type 2 diabetes: A five-year cohort sdudy in China(Report1)[J ] . Int J Envion Res Public Health, 2015, 12(7):7899-7909. DOI:10.3390/ijerph120707899.
MA D, ZHU X, ZHAO P, et al . Profile of Th17 cytokines(IL-17, TGF-beta, IL-6) and Th1 cytokine(IFN-gamma) in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura[J ] . Ann Hematol, 2008, 87(11):899-904.DOI: 10.1007/s00277-008-0535-3.
李晶, 付川, 谢汉平.高渗盐水点眼制作的小鼠干眼模型与评估[J].第三军医大学学报, 2010, 32(11):1183-1185. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.2010.11.006.
LI J, FU C, XIE H P. Mouse model of dry eye induced by hyperosmolar saline and its evaluation[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2010, 32(11):1183-1185. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.2010.11.006.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621