
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.400038 重庆,第三军医大学心理学院军人发展与教育心理学教研室
2.400038 重庆,重庆师范大学教育科学学院
[ 杨国愉, E-mail:876274215@qq.com YANG Guoyu, E-mail:876274215@qq.com
收稿:2017-04-10,
修回:2017-06-10,
纸质出版:2017-08-15
移动端阅览
张晶轩, 杨国愉, 赵梦雪, 等. 正负性情绪、社会支持和冲动性对强制隔离戒毒人员复吸倾向的影响[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017,39(15):1594-1598.
Jingxuan ZHANG, Guoyu YANG, Mengxue ZHAO, et al. Effects of positive and negative affect, social support and impulsivity on relapse trend of drug abusers in compulsory isolated detoxification center[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2017, 39(15): 1594-1598.
张晶轩, 杨国愉, 赵梦雪, 等. 正负性情绪、社会支持和冲动性对强制隔离戒毒人员复吸倾向的影响[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017,39(15):1594-1598. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704042.
Jingxuan ZHANG, Guoyu YANG, Mengxue ZHAO, et al. Effects of positive and negative affect, social support and impulsivity on relapse trend of drug abusers in compulsory isolated detoxification center[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2017, 39(15): 1594-1598. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704042.
目的
2
探讨强制隔离戒毒人员正负性情绪、社会支持和冲动性对复吸倾向的影响。
方法
2
采用正负性情绪量表(positive and negative affect scale,PANAS)、社会支持评定量表(social support revalued scale,SSRS)和冲动性量表第11版(Barratt impulsiveness scale 11 version,BIS-11) 分别对戒毒人员进行测量,并采用复吸倾向量表对戒毒人员复吸倾向进行考察。运用多元回归分析方法建立模型,考察正负性情绪、社会支持和冲动性与复吸倾向之间的关系。
结果
2
① 戒毒人员的复吸倾向与年龄、性别、婚姻状况和文化程度等人口学变量无关。② 运动冲动性、负性情绪和主观社会支持对复吸倾向存在显著影响(
R
2
=0.087,
F
=15.056,
P
<0.05),且运动冲动性和负性情绪越高、主观社会支持越低,复吸倾向越明显。③ 运动冲动性在注意冲动性和复吸倾向之间起部分中介作用,在无计划冲动性和复吸倾向之间起完全中介作用;主观支持在支持利用度和复吸倾向之间起完全的中介作用。
结论
2
强制隔离戒毒人员的负性情绪、主观社会支持和运动冲动性直接影响其复吸倾向;而注意冲动性、无计划冲动性和支持利用度间接影响其复吸倾向。
Objective
2
To investigate the effects of positive and negative affect
social support and impulsivity on relapse trend of drug abusers in compulsory isolated detoxification center.
Methods
2
Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)
Social Support Revalued Scale (SSRS) and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11 version (BIS-11) were employed to evaluate drug abusers' emotion
social support and impulsivity. Relapse Trend Scale (RTS) was used to assess the participants' possibility of drug relapse. Multi-factor linear regression was applied to explore the relationship of positive and negative emotion
social support and impulsivity with relapse trend.
Results
2
① Drug abusers' relapse trend was not related with age
gender
marital status and educational background. ② Motor impulsivity
negative emotion and perceived social support had significant effect on relapse trend (
R
2
=0.087
F
=15.056
P
<
0.05). Stronger motor impulsivity and negative emotion
and lower perceived social support suggested obvious relapse trend. ③ Motor impulsivity exerted partially mediating effect between attentional impulsivity and relapse trend
and full mediating effect between non-planning impulsivity and relapse trend. Also a full mediation effect was also seen in perceived social support between utilization social support and relapse trend.
Conclusion
2
Negative emotion
perceived social support and motor impulsivity directly affect relapse trend in drug abusers in compulsory isolated detoxification center. While attentional impulsivity
nonplanning impulsivity and utilization of social support exert indirect effect.
杨波.毒品成瘾与心理康复[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2015: 132.
YANG B. Drug addiction and psychological rehabilitation[M]. Beijing: China University of Political Sciences and Law Press, 2015: 132.
孙步青, 叶遇高, 秦领军. 615例海洛因依赖者复吸原因调查与分析[J].中国药物依赖性杂志, 2001, 10(3): 214-216. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9718.2001.03.018.
SUN B Q, YE Y G, QIN L J. An analysis of relapse factors of 615 heroin addicts[J]. Chin J Drug Depend, 2001, 10(3): 214-216. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9718.2001.03.018.
王海琴, 蒲东华. 518例阿片类依赖者复吸原因分析[J].中国药物滥用防治杂志, 2004, 10(2): 85-87. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-902X.2004.02.007.
WANG H Q, PU D H. An analysis of relapse factors of opioid addicts[J]. Chin J Drug Abuse Preven Treat, 2004, 10(2): 85-87. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-902X.2004.02.007.
MARCHANT N J, LI X, SHAHAM Y. Recent developments in animal models of drug relapse[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2013, 23(4): 675-683. DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.003.
BECK A T. Cognitive therapy: past, present, and future[J]. J Consult Clin Psychal, 1993, 61(2): 194-198. DOI:10.1037/0022-006x.61.2.194.
TIFFANY S T, CARTER B L. Is craving the source of compulsive drug use[J]. J Psychopharmacol (Oxford), 1998, 12(1): 23-30. DOI:10.1177/026988119801200104.
梁建辉, 刘锐克.药物渴求对复吸行为的始动作用[J].中国药物滥用防治杂志, 2001, 7(4): 31-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-902X.2001.04.009.
LIANG J H, LIU R K. Starting influence of drug craving to relapse behavior[J]. Chin J Drug Abuse Preven and Treat, 2001, 7(4): 31-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-902X.2001.04.009.
张作记.行为医学量表手册[M].北京:中华医学电子音像出版社, 2005: 236, 206.
ZHANG Z J. Behavioral medical scale handbook[M]. Beijing: Chinese Medical Multimedia Press, 2005: 236, 206.
李献云, 费立鹏, 徐东, 等. Barratt冲动性量表中文修订版在社区和大学人群中应用的信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(8): 610-615. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.08.013.
LI X Y, FEI L P, XU D, et al . Reliability and validity of an adapted chinese version of barratt impulsiveness scale[J ] . Chin Ment Health J, 2011, 25(8): 610-615. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.08.013.
庄艳佳. 生命意义源与生命意义感对戒毒人员复吸倾向的影响与团体干预研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2015: 59. [http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10270-1015371416.htm .
ZHUANG Y J. An intervention and research on the effect of sources of meaning and meaning in life on relapse tendency among drug abstainers[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2015: 59.
温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620.
WEN Z L, ZHANG L, HOU J T, et al . Testing and application of the mediating effects[J ] . Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2004, 36(5): 614-620.
[DEMPSTER F N, CORKILL A J. Neo-interference research and the development of intelligence[M ] //Anderson, M (Ed). The development of intelligence. Hove, England: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis (UK), 1999: 215-243. DOI: 10.1086/650572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/650572.
朱湘如, 刘昌.前扣带回功能的冲突监测理论[J].心理科学进展, 2005, 13(6):767-773. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2005.06.011.
ZHU X R, LIU C. A brief review of conflict monitoring theory[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2005, 13(6):767-773. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2005.06.011.
BAKER T B, PIPER M E, MCCARTHY D E, et al . Addiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement[J ] . Psychol Rev, 2004, 111(1): 33-51. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.33.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621