单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗宫颈癌：一项单中心的初步研究

王延洲; 陈功立; 徐嘉莉; 李玉迪; 邓黎; 陈诚; 梁小龙; 徐惠成; 梁志清

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗宫颈癌：一项单中心的初步研究

临床医学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗宫颈癌：一项单中心的初步研究
- Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer:asingle-center trial
- 第三军医大学学报 2017年39卷第13期页码：1392-1395
- 作者机构：
  
  400038，重庆，第三军医大学西南医院妇产科
- 作者简介：
  
  [梁志清, E-mail: zhi_lzliang@163.com LING Zhiqing, E-mail: zhi_lzliang@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  第三军医大学第一附属医院临床新技术计划原始创新型重点项目(SWH2016YSCXZD-07)
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704007
  中图分类号： R195.4;R730.56;R737.33
- 收稿：2017-04-04，
  
  修回：2017-04-24，
  
  纸质出版：2017-07-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王延洲, 陈功立, 徐嘉莉, 等. 单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗宫颈癌：一项单中心的初步研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017,39(13):1392-1395.

Yanzhou WANG, Gongli CHEN, Jiali XU, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer:asingle-center trial[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2017, 39(13): 1392-1395.
王延洲, 陈功立, 徐嘉莉, 等. 单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗宫颈癌：一项单中心的初步研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017,39(13):1392-1395. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704007.

Yanzhou WANG, Gongli CHEN, Jiali XU, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer:asingle-center trial[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2017, 39(13): 1392-1395. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704007.

摘要

目的

探讨单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗早期宫颈癌的可行性、安全性和短期临床结局。

方法

2016年10月至2017年3月前瞻性纳入第三军医大学西南医院妇产科诊断为宫颈癌的患者，行单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除+盆腔淋巴结清扫术。统计患者人口学特征、临床肿瘤学结局和围手术期效果。

结果

27例患者尝试手术，26例成功完成(96%)，1例因术中探查合并Ⅳ期子宫内膜异位症而中转为多孔腹腔镜手术。患者中位年龄46岁，体质量指数为22.1 kg/m

，中位手术时间237 min，术中失血量平均186 mL。2例术中血管损伤，1例膀胱损伤，均在术中单孔腹腔镜下完成修补。平均盆腔淋巴结清扫数目21枚，手术切缘病理学检查均为阴性。1例患者因2枚盆腔淋巴结转移，术后进行化疗+放疗；7例合并中危因素患者，术后进行放疗。

结论

具有丰富的妇科肿瘤腹腔镜手术经验的医生熟练掌握单孔腹腔镜手术技术的情况下，采用单孔腹腔镜手术是进行广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫手术是可行的。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the feasibility

safety

and short-term outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (LESS-RH/PLND) in treatment of cervical cancer.

Methods

Cervical cancer patients diagnosed and treated with LESS-RH/PLND in Southwest Hospital from October 2016 to March 2017 were prospectively enrolled in this study. The demographic data

and clinical

pathological and peri-operative outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-seven women were recruited and attempted for LESS-RH/PLND. Twenty-six (96%) underwent the procedure successfully

and 1 patient was converted to 3-port laparoscopy due to stage Ⅳ endometriosis. Their median age was 46 years

and body mass index was 22.1 kg/m

. Their median operation time was 237 min and intraoperative blood loss was 186 mL. Two cases of large veins lacerations and one of bladder injury occurred duri

ng operation

and all were sutured promptly under a laparoendoscope. The median number of pelvic lymph node removal was 21. All surgical margins were negative. One patient received postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy because of 2 positive pelvic nodes. Another 7 patients received radiation therapy after the surgery because of complication of risk factors.

Conclusion

For the doctors with rich experience in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery and mastering the technique of single-port laparoscopic surgery

LESS-RH/PLND is feasible and safe for cervical cancer patients.

关键词

Keywords

references

WANG Y Z, DENG L, XU H C, et al . Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage c ervical cancer[J ] . BMC Cancer, 2015, 15: 928. DOI:10.1186/s12885-015-1818-4.

BORUTA D M. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: An update[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 141(3): 616-623. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.014.

XU H, CHEN Y, LI Y, et al . Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures[J ] . Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(6): 960-964. DOI:10.1007/s00464-006-9129-0.

CIBULA D, ABU-RUSTUMNR, BENEDETTI-PANICI P, et al . New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis onathree-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection[J ] . Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 122(2): 264-268. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029.

American college of obstetricians and gynecologists women's health care physicians.. Technology assessment no. 10: single-incision laparoscopy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(2 Pt 1): 429-431. DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000433009.93971.23.

MENDIVIL A A, RETTENMAIER M A, ABAID L N, et al . Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-a ssisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy:Afive year experience[J ] . Surg Oncol, 2016, 25(1): 66-71. DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2015.09.004.

SERT B M, BOGGESS J F, AHMAD S, et al . Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy:Amulti-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer[J ] . EurJSurg Oncol, 2016, 42(4): 513-522. DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.014.

PARK D A, YUN J E, KIM S W, et al . Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer:Asystematic review and meta-analysis[J ] . EurJSurg Oncol, 2016, pii: S0748-7983(16)30687-4.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017.

GARRETT L A, BORUTA D M 2ND. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy: the first report of LESS type Ⅲ hysterectomy involvesawoman with cervical cancer[J]. AmJObstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(6): 518-511. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.868.

BORUTA D M, FAGOTTI A, BRADFORD L S, et al . Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: initial multi-institutional experience for treatment of invasive cervical cancer[J ] .JMinim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(3): 394-398. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.005.

FIGURELLI J, BRESSON L, NARDUCCI F, et al . Single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology: outcomes and feasibility[J ] . IntJGynecol Cancer, 2014, 24(6): 1126-1132. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000150.

BEDAIWY M A, SHEYN D, EGHDAMI L, et al . Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for benign ovarian cystectomies[J ] . Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2015, 79(3): 179-183. DOI:10.1159/000367659.

PARK J Y, KIM DY, KIM SH, et al . Laparoendoscopic single-site compared with conventional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma[J ] .JMinim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(5): 813-819. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.012.

LEE J, KIM S, NAM E J, et al . Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus[J ] . Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2015, 58(3): 239-245. DOI:10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.239.

PARK J Y, NHO J, CHO I J, et al . Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease[J ] . Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(4): 890-897. DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3747-8.

梁志清, 徐惠成, 熊光武, 等.腹腔镜在子宫颈癌治疗中的应用——附37例分析[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2002, 2(s1):62-63. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2002.z1.030.

LIANG Z Q, XU H C, XIONG G W, et al . Application of laparoscopy in the treatment of cervical cancer——analysis of 37 cases[J ] . ChinJMini Inv Surg, 2002, 2(s1):62-63.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2002.z1.030.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

全身炎症反应指数联合临床病理参数预测宫颈癌复发的模型建立与验证

不同铅门宽度在宫颈癌容积调强放疗中的应用效果分析

某医院4 084例妇科门诊患者HPV感染特征分析

3D打印模具在宫颈癌近距离治疗中重复使用可行性研究

RNA传感器IFIH1对HPV阳性的宫颈癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭的影响