
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.福建中医药大学附属人民医院肛肠科,福州 350004
2.福建中医药大学附属人民医院超声影像科,福州 350004
3.福建中医药大学第一临床医学院,福州 350000
吴许雄,Email:22564457@qq.com,研究方向:肛肠盆底外科。
石 荣,Email:13509393654@139.com。
收稿:2024-05-16,
修回:2024-08-20,
录用:2024-10-10,
纸质出版:2025-06-28
移动端阅览
吴许雄,徐丽美,黄娟,等.3D-HRAM模型诊断及定位复杂性肛瘘术后肛门括约肌损伤的应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2025,50(6):821-827.
Wu Xuxiong,Xu Limei,Huang Juan,et al.Application of 3D-HRAM model in diagnosis and localization of anal sphincter injury after surgery for complex anal fistula[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2025,50(6):821-827.
吴许雄,徐丽美,黄娟,等.3D-HRAM模型诊断及定位复杂性肛瘘术后肛门括约肌损伤的应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2025,50(6):821-827. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003641.
Wu Xuxiong,Xu Limei,Huang Juan,et al.Application of 3D-HRAM model in diagnosis and localization of anal sphincter injury after surgery for complex anal fistula[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2025,50(6):821-827. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003641.
目的
2
探讨三维高分辨肛门直肠压力测定(three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry,3D-HRAM)模型诊断及定位复杂性肛瘘术后肛门括约肌损伤的应用价值。
方法
2
前瞻性纳入2023年1月至2024年1月福建中医药大学附属人民医院肛肠科复杂性肛瘘术后患者92例为研究对象,分两阶段进行研究。第一阶段将92例患者均行3D-HRAM及直肠腔内超声(endoanal ultrasonography,EAUS)检查,检测括约肌信息,与术中记录对比,评估二者诊断效能及定位准确性。第二阶段将已检测的92例患者按伴/不伴肛门功能障碍症状分组,进一步评估2种检测方法对于术后括约肌损伤代偿/失代偿病例的诊断及定位价值。
结果
2
92例患者经3D-HRAM诊断括约肌损伤41例,敏感度为61.19%,特异度为88%,绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线计算曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.739,定位准确率为44.77%;经EAUS诊断57例,敏感度为85.07%,特异度为76%,AUC为0.813,定位准确率为71.64%,二者对比差异有统计学意义(
P
=0.002),提示3D-HARM对复杂性肛瘘术后括约肌损伤的诊断效能和定位准确率均低于EAUS。通过症状分组后,3D-HRAM对于有症状的括约肌损伤(失代偿)病例的诊断效能及定位准确率明显优于无症状组,而与EAUS相似(
P
=0.763)。
结论
2
3D-HRAM的应用优势在于诊断及定位复杂性肛瘘术后肛门括约肌损伤失代偿的病例,可为肛门控便机制及损伤代偿机制的研究提供有效技术支持。
Objective
2
To explore the application value of three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry(3D-HRAM) model in the diagnosis and localization of anal sphincter injury after surgery for complex anal fistula.
Methods
2
A prospective study was conducted on 92 patients who had undergone surgery for complex anal fistula in the Department of Coloproctology of The People’s Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2023 to January 2024. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage,92 patients underwent 3D-HRAM and endoanal ultrasonography(EAUS) to examine the sphincter,and the data were compared with intraoperative records to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency and localization accuracy of 3D-HRAM and EAUS. In the second stage,92 patients who had been examined were grouped according to the presence or absence of symptoms of anal dysfunction to further verify the diagnostic and localization values of 3D-HRAM and EAUS for postoperative compensated/decompensated sphincter injury.
Results
2
Among 92 patients,41 and 57 patients were diagnosed with sphincter injury through 3D-HRAM and EAUS,with a sensitivity of 61.19% and 85.07%,a specificity of 88% and 76%,an area under the curve of 0.739 and 0.813 calculated by plotting the receiver operating characteristic curve,and a localization accuracy of 44.77% and 71.64%,respectively,showing significant differences between 3D-HRAM and EAUS(
P
=0.002),indicating that 3D-HRAM had lower diagnostic efficiency and localization accuracy than EAUS for anal sphincter injury after surgery for complex anal fistula. After grouping by symptoms,the diagnostic efficiency and localization accuracy of 3D-HRAM for symptomatic sphincter injury(decompensated) were significantly better than those for asymptomatic sphincter injury,and were similar to those of EAUS(
P
=0.763).
Conclusion
2
The application advantage of 3D-HRAM lies in the diagnosis and localization of decompensated anal sphincter injury after surgery for complex anal fistula,which provides effective technical support for the study of anal defecation control mechanisms and injury compensation mechanisms.
吴许雄 , 黄 娟 , 王淼 , 等 . 基于Logistic回归分析217例复杂性肛瘘患者术后肛门功能障碍的中西医危险因素研究 [J ] . 湖南中医药大学学报 , 2023 , 43 ( 3 ): 550 - 556 .
Wu XX , Huang J , Wang M , et al . Risk factors of postoperative anal dysfunction in 217 patients with complex anal fistula treated by Chinese medicine and western medicine based on Logistic regression analysis [J ] . J Hunan Univ Chin Med , 2023 , 43 ( 3 ): 550 - 556 .
吴许雄 , 黄 娟 , 吴晓静 , 等 . 复杂性肛瘘术后肛门失禁风险预测模型的建立及评价 [J ] . 重庆医科大学学报 , 2023 , 48 ( 5 ): 575 - 580 .
Wu XX , Huang J , Wu XJ , et al . Establishment and evaluation of risk prediction model of anal incontinence after complex anal fistula surgery [J ] . J Chongqing Med Univ , 2023 , 48 ( 5 ): 575 - 580 .
Heitmann PT , Vollebregt PF , Knowles CH , et al . Understanding the physiology of human defaecation and disorders of continence and evacuation [J ] . Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol , 2021 , 18 ( 11 ): 751 - 769 .
Mansi S , Vaz K , Santucci NR , et al . Anal sphincter defect and fecal incontinence [J ] . JPGN Rep , 2022 , 3 ( 4 ): e254 .
Vogel JD , Johnson EK , Morris AM , et al . Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess,fistula-in-ano,and rectovaginal fistula [J ] . Dis Colon Rectum , 2016 , 59 ( 12 ): 1117 - 1133 .
Carrington EV , Heinrich H , Knowles CH , et al . The international anorectal physiology working group(IAPWG) recommendations:standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function [J ] . Neurogastroenterol Motil , 2020 , 32 ( 1 ): e13679 .
Rezaie A , Iriana S , Pimentel M , et al . Can three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry detect anal sphincter defects in patients with faecal incontinence? [J ] . Colorectal Dis , 2017 , 19 ( 5 ): 468 - 475 .
Zhao BH , Li YB , Tang YC , et al . Assessing obstetric anal sphincter injuries:a comparison of exoanal and endoanal ultrasound [J ] . J Ultrasound Med , 2023 , 42 ( 9 ): 2031 - 2038 .
Jorge JM , Wexner SD . Etiology and management of fecal incontinence [J ] . Dis Colon Rectum , 1993 , 36 ( 1 ): 77 - 97 .
Okeahialam NA , Thakar R , Sultan AH . Comparison of diagnostic criteria for significant anal sphincter defects between endoanal and transperineal ultrasound [J ] . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol , 2022 , 60 ( 6 ): 793 - 799 .
Wen LM , Zhao BH , Tang YC , et al . Morphological differences in the female anal sphincter complex between endoanal and exoanal ultrasound [J ] . Int Urogynecol J , 2023 , 34 ( 2 ): 545 - 551 .
朱文峰 , 方建强 , 崔 蕾 , 等 . 直肠腔内超声评估大便失禁患者肛管括约肌缺损的临床价值 [J ] . 结直肠肛门外科 , 2017 , 23 ( 3 ): 379 - 382 .
Zhu WF , Fang JQ , Cui L , et al . Clinical value of endorectal ultrasonography in fecal incontinence patients with anal sphincter defect [J ] . China Ind Econ , 2017 , 23 ( 3 ): 379 - 382 .
Luciano L , Bouvier M , Baumstarck K , et al . Is the extent of obstetric anal sphincter injury correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence in the long term? [J ] . Tech Coloproctol , 2020 , 24 ( 1 ): 49 - 55 .
Rao SSC , Ahuja NK , Bharucha AE , et al . Optimizing the utility of anorectal manometry for diagnosis and therapy:a roundtable review and recommendations [J ] . Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol , 2023 , 21 ( 11 ): 2727 - 2739 .
Carrington EV , Heinrich H , Knowles CH , et al . Methods of anorectal manometry vary widely in clinical practice:results from an international survey [J ] . Neurogastroenterol Motil , 2017 , 29 ( 8 ): e13016 .
Benezech A , Behr M , Bouvier M , et al . Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry:does it allow automated analysis of sphincter defects? [J ] . Colorectal Dis , 2015 , 17 ( 10 ): 202 - 207 .
Büyükaşık S , Bozkurt MA , Kapan , et al . Analyzing the role of anal sphincter pressure in rectocele formation [J ] . Ann Coloproctol , 2020 , 36 ( 5 ): 330 - 334 .
Trzpis M , Sun G , Chen JH , et al . Novel insights into physiological mechanisms underlying fecal continence [J ] . Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol , 2023 , 324 ( 1 ): 1 - 9 .
Jonker JE , Trzpis M , Broens PMA . Fecal continence for solid and liquid stool:the function of the anal-external sphincter continence reflex and the puborectal continence reflex [J ] . Dis Colon Rectum , 2020 , 63 ( 10 ): 1419 - 1426 .
Khamar J , Sachdeva A , McKechnie T , et al . Cutting Seton for the treatment of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Tech Coloproctol , 2023 , 28 ( 1 ): 12 .
0
浏览量
8
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621