
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.重庆医科大学附属第一医院,呼吸与危重症医学科,重庆 400016
2.重庆医科大学附属第一医院,麻醉科,重庆 400016
孙敏越,Email:360758958@qq.com,研究方向:呼吸与危重症护理。
杨相梅,Email:numei@126.com。
收稿:2023-12-15,
修回:2024-02-29,
录用:2024-03-04,
纸质出版:2024-07-28
移动端阅览
孙敏越,谭莉,罗艳,等.气道打开体位自动调节器在非紧急气管插管中的临床应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2024,49(7):904-911.
Sun Minyue,Tan Li,Luo Yan,et al.Clinical application of a new airway opening device with automatic position adjustment in non-emergency endotracheal intubation[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2024,49(7):904-911.
孙敏越,谭莉,罗艳,等.气道打开体位自动调节器在非紧急气管插管中的临床应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2024,49(7):904-911. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003548.
Sun Minyue,Tan Li,Luo Yan,et al.Clinical application of a new airway opening device with automatic position adjustment in non-emergency endotracheal intubation[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2024,49(7):904-911. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003548.
目的
2
探索气道打开体位自动调节器在非紧急气管插管中的临床应用效果。
方法
2
选取2022年6月至2023年4月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院手术室行择期全麻手术的非紧急气管插管患者312例,并按随机对照原则将患者分为人工对照组和仪器试验组(体位夹角90°组、体位夹角95°组和体位夹角100°组)。比较4组间首次插管成功率、声门视野暴露情况、暴露声门时间、插管时间、尝试插管次数、插管困难量表评分(intubation difficulty scales,IDS评分)以及插管并发症和不良反应发生率的差异。
结果
2
仪器体位夹角100°组的首次插管成功率、声门视野暴露分级(cormack-lehane grade,CL分级)、声门开口百分比评分(the percentage of glottic opening score,POGO评分)、尝试插管次数、暴露声门时间和插管时间均明显优于人工对照组(校正后
P
<
0.05);仪器体位夹角90°组和95°组与人工对照组之间、3组仪器试验组之间的差异无统计学意义(校正后
P
>
0.05);仪器体位夹角95°组和100°组的IDS评分显著低于人工对照组(校正后
P
<
0.05),其他组两两之间的差异无统计学意义(校正后
P
>
0.05);4组在插管并发症的发生率上没有明显差异(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
气道打开体位自动调节器在体位夹角90°~100°时均能代替人工方法安全有效地打开非紧急气管插管患者的气道,在体位夹角为100°时能够提高首次插管成功率、改善声门视野暴露、减少尝试插管次数并缩短暴露声门时间和插管时间,在体位夹角95°和100°时能够降低气管插管的困难程度。
Objective
2
To investigate the clinical application effect of a new airway opening device with automatic position adjustment in non-emergency endotracheal intubation.
Methods
2
A total of 312 patients who underwent non-emergency endotracheal intubation for elective surgery under general anesthesia in the operating room of The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from June 2022 to April 2023 were enrolled,and they were randomly divided into control group and instrument test group,which was further divided into position angle(PA) 90° group,PA 95° group,and PA 100° group. The four groups were compared in terms of the success rate of first intubation,Cormack-Lehane(CL) grade,time of glottis exposure,intubation time,the number of intubation attempts,Intubation Difficulty Scale(IDS) score,and the incidence rates of intubation complications and device-related adverse reactions.
Results
2
Compared with the control group,the PA 100° group had significantly better success rate of first intubation,CL grade,Percentage of Glottic Opening score,number of intubation attempts,time of glottis exposure,and intubation time(
P
after adjustment
<
0.05). There were no significant differences in these indices between the PA 90° and 95° groups and the control group,as well as between the three instrument test groups(
P
after adjustment
>
0.05). The PA 95° group and the PA 100° had a significantly lower IDS score than the control group(
P
after adjustment
<
0.05),and there was no significant difference between any two of the other groups(
P
after adjustment
>
0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of intubation complications between the four groups(
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The new airway opening device with automatic position adjustment can safely and effectively replace the manual method to open the airway of patients undergoing non-emergency endotracheal intubation,and a PA of 100° can increase the success rate of first intubation,improve glottis exposure,reduce the number of intubation attempts,and shorten the time of glottis exposure and intubation time. The difficulty of endotracheal intubation can be reduced at a PA of 95° or 100°.
Heidegger T . Management of the difficult airway [J ] . N Engl J Med , 2021 , 384 ( 19 ): 1836 - 1847 .
Woodall NM , Cook TM . National census of airway management techniques used for anaesthesia in the UK:first phase of the Fourth National Audit Project at the Royal College of Anaesthetists [J ] . Br J Anaesth , 2011 , 106 ( 2 ): 266 - 271 .
Russotto V , Myatra SN , Laffey JG , et al . Intubation practices and adverse peri-intubation events in critically ill patients from 29 countries [J ] . JAMA , 2021 , 325 ( 12 ): 1164 - 1172 .
Wong DT , Yee AJ , Leong SM , et al . The effectiveness of apneic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in various clinical settings:a narrative review [J ] . Can J Anaesth , 2017 , 64 ( 4 ): 416 - 427 .
Ahmad I , El-Boghdadly K , Bhagrath R , et al . Difficult Airway Society guidelines for awake tracheal intubation(ATI) in adults [J ] . Anaesthesia , 2020 , 75 ( 4 ): 509 - 528 .
蒋芝英 , 陈向芬 , 莫 莉 , 等 . 气管插管人工气道管理的研究进展 [J ] . 微创医学 , 2012 , 7 ( 2 ): 173 - 175 .
Jiang ZY , Chen XF , Mo L , et al . Research progress on artificial airway management of tracheal intubation [J ] . J Minim Invasive Med , 2012 , 7 ( 2 ): 173 - 175 .
Janz DR , Casey JD , Semler MW , et al . Effect of a fluid bolus on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation(PrePARE):a randomised controlled trial [J ] . Lancet Respir Med , 2019 , 7 ( 12 ): 1039 - 1047 .
柏长青 , 苑 鑫 . 人工气道的建立:临床选择与实施 [J ] . 中华结核和呼吸杂志 , 2013 , 36 ( 8 ): 630 - 632 .
Bai CQ , Yuan X . Establishment of artificial airway:clinical selection and implementation [J ] . Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis , 2013 , 36 ( 8 ): 630 - 632 .
Levitan RM , Heitz JW , Sweeney M , et al . The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices [J ] . Ann Emerg Med , 2011 , 57 ( 3 ): 240 - 247 .
陈红梅 , 黄 娟 , 周丽 , 等 . 喉镜下声门暴露困难相关因素研究进展 [J ] . 海南医学 , 2019 , 30 ( 16 ): 2151 - 2155 .
Chen HM , Huang J , Zhou L , et al . Advance in risk factors of difficult laryngeal exposure with laryngoscopy [J ] . Hainan Med J , 2019 , 30 ( 16 ): 2151 - 2155 .
Frerk C , Mitchell VS , McNarry AF , et al . Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults [J ] . Br J Anaesth , 2015 , 115 ( 6 ): 827 - 848 .
Barnes MP , Greer PB . Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check(MPC):mechanical and collimation checks [J ] . J Appl Clin Med Phys , 2017 , 18 ( 3 ): 56 - 66 .
Li YT , Netherton T , Nitsch PL , et al . Independent validation of machine performance check for the Halcyon and TrueBeam linacs for daily quality assurance [J ] . J Appl Clin Med Phys , 2018 , 19 ( 5 ): 375 - 382 .
Cai B , He Y , Bollinger D , et al . Three year experience of electronic portal imaging device based daily QA for photon radiation beams [J ] . Biomed Phys Eng Express , 2018 , 5 ( 1 ): 015005 .
Tsan SEH , Lim SM , Abidin MFZ , et al . Comparison of macintosh laryngoscopy in bed-up-head-elevated position with GlideScope laryngoscopy:a randomized,controlled,noninferiority trial [J ] . Anesth Analg , 2020 , 131 ( 1 ): 210 - 219 .
Okada Y , Nakayama Y , Hashimoto K , et al . Ramped versus sniffing position for tracheal intubation:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Am J Emerg Med , 2021 , 44 : 250 - 256 .
黄 娟 , 陈红梅 , 罗 艳 , 等 . 不同体位对直接喉镜气管插管效果影响的meta分析 [J ] . 现代医药卫生 , 2021 , 37 ( 2 ): 181 - 187 .
Huang J , Chen HM , Luo Y , et al . Effects of different body position for tracheal intubation during direct layngoscopy:a meta-analysis [J ] . J Mod Med Health , 2021 , 37 ( 2 ): 181 - 187 .
陈红梅 , 罗艳 , 吴俊 , 等 . 气道打开体位自动调节装置的研制与初步应用 [J ] . 中国医疗设备 , 2022 , 37 ( 9 ): 9 - 13+41 .
Chen HM , Luo Y , Wu J , et al . Development and preliminary application of automatic position adjustment device for airway opening [J ] . China Medical Equipment , 2022 , 37 ( 9 ): 9 - 13+41 .
陈红梅 . 气道打开体位自动调节器的研制及有效性和安全性研究 [D ] . 重庆 : 重庆医科大学 , 2021 .
Chen HM . Development,effectiveness and safety of automatic regulator for airway opening position [D ] . Chongqing : Chongqing Medical University , 2021 .
Park SH , Park HP , Jeon YT , et al . A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height [J ] . J Anesth , 2010 , 24 ( 4 ): 526 - 530 .
El-Orbany MI , Getachew YB , Joseph NJ , et al . Head elevation improves laryngeal exposure with direct laryngoscopy [J ] . J Clin Anesth , 2015 , 27 ( 2 ): 153 - 158 .
Levitan RM , Mechem CC , Ochroch EA , et al . Head-elevated laryngoscopy position:improving laryngeal exposure during laryngoscopy by increasing head elevation [J ] . Ann Emerg Med , 2003 , 41 ( 3 ): 322 - 330 .
Oertel BG , Lötsch J . Clinical pharmacology of analgesics assessed with human experimental pain models:bridging basic and clinical research [J ] . Br J Pharmacol , 2013 , 168 ( 3 ): 534 - 553 .
Brown EN , Pavone KJ , Naranjo M . Multimodal general anesthesia:theory and practice [J ] . Anesth Analg , 2018 , 127 ( 5 ): 1246 - 1258 .
Wu ZJ , Yu JJ , Lin QH , et al . Effects of an Intraoperative Intravenous Bolus Dose of Dexmedetomidine on Remifentanil-Induced Postinfusion Hyperalgesia in Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy:a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [J ] . Anesth Analg , 2021 , 132 ( 2 ): 320 - 328 .
Meier NM , Gibbs KW . Evolving tracheal intubation practice patterns in the pandemic era [J ] . Chest , 2021 , 160 ( 6 ): 1993 - 1994 .
Nauka PC , Chen JT , Shiloh AL , et al . Practice,outcomes,and complications of emergent endotracheal intubation by critical care practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic [J ] . Chest , 2021 , 160 ( 6 ): 2112 - 2122 .
de Carvalho CC , da Silva DM , Lemos VM , et al . Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in tracheal intubation in adults:a ranking systematic review and network meta-analysis [J ] . Anaesthesia , 2022 , 77 ( 3 ): 326 - 338 .
Chan M , Fehlmann CA , Pasquier M , et al . Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate in an Urban,Supervised,Resident-Staffed Emergency Mobile System:an 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study [J ] . J Clin Med , 2020 , 9 ( 1 ): 238 .
0
浏览量
5
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621