
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
重庆市中医院骨科,重庆 400010
张传志,E-mail:18983882876@163.com
收稿日期:2024-09-18,
纸质出版日期:2025-07-25
移动端阅览
周庾,唐大刚,彭维等.自制辅助复位装置结合经跗骨窦入路治疗跟骨SandersⅡ~Ⅳ型骨折的疗效观察[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(07):604-609.
ZHOU Yu,TANG Da-gang,PENG Wei,et al.Observation on therapeutic effect of self-made auxiliary reduction device combined with sinus tarsi approach in treatment of Sanders type Ⅱ to Ⅳ calcaneal fractures[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(07):604-609.
周庾,唐大刚,彭维等.自制辅助复位装置结合经跗骨窦入路治疗跟骨SandersⅡ~Ⅳ型骨折的疗效观察[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(07):604-609. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.09E024099.
ZHOU Yu,TANG Da-gang,PENG Wei,et al.Observation on therapeutic effect of self-made auxiliary reduction device combined with sinus tarsi approach in treatment of Sanders type Ⅱ to Ⅳ calcaneal fractures[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(07):604-609. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.09E024099.
目的
2
观察自制辅助复位装置结合跗骨窦入路(STA)治疗跟骨Sanders Ⅱ~Ⅳ型骨折的效果。
方法
2
选择我院2023年1―6月收治的40例跟骨Sanders Ⅱ~Ⅳ型骨折患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组20例。对照组患者使用足跟扩大外侧L形入路(ELA)进行手术治疗,观察组患者采用辅助复位装置结合STA进行手术治疗。比较2组患者手术相关指标、术后并发症情况及足踝解剖学指标,采用美国足踝外科学会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分量表及Maryland足功能评分评估患肢功能恢复情况。
结果
2
2组患者的手术时间、术后切口干燥时间、术后疼痛持续时间比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05);观察组患者的术后拆线时间短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义
(
P
<
0.05)。观察组患者切口皮缘坏死发生率及并发症总发生率均低于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。2组患者术后Böhler角、Gissane角均较术前增大(
P
<
0.05);2组患者术后Böhler角、Gissane角比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。观察组患者仅术后1周AOFAS评分高于对照组(
P
<
0.05),其他时间点2组患者的AOFAS评分和Maryland评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
辅助复位装置结合STA治疗跟骨SandersⅡ~Ⅳ型骨折可有效恢复足踝功能,而且术后拆线时间短,术后并发症发生率低。
Objective
2
To observe the efficacy of self-made auxiliary reduction device combined with sinus tarsi approach (STA) in the treatment of Sanders type Ⅱ to Ⅳ calcaneal fractures.
Methods
2
A total of 40 patients with Sanders type Ⅱ to Ⅳ calcaneal fractures admitted to our hospital from January to June 2023 were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group by the random number table method, with 20 cases in each group. Patients in the control group underwent surgical treatment with the heel extensile lateral approach (ELA), while patients in the observation group underwent surgical treatment with the auxiliary reduction device combined with STA. The surgical-related indicators, postoperative complications and ankle-foot anatomical indicators of patients in the two groups were compared. The recovery of limb function was evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and Maryland foot function score.
Results
2
There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time, postoperative incision drying time, or duration of postoperative pain between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). The postoperative suture removal time of the patients in the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). The incidence of skin edge necrosis of incision and the total incidence of complications
of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05). The Böhler angle and Gissane angle of patients in both groups increased after surgery compared with those before surgery (
P
<
0.05); there was no statistically significant difference in the Böhler angle or Gissane angle after surgery of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). The AOFAS score1 week after surgery of the patients in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (
P
<
0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences in the AOFAS scores or Maryland scores of patients at other time points between the two groups (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The use of the auxiliary reduction device in surgical treatment with STA for Sanders type Ⅱ to Ⅳ calcaneal fractures can effectively restore the function of the foot and ankle, with short postoperative suture removal time and low incidence of postoperative complications.
Palmersheim K , Hines B , Olsen BL . Calcaneal fractures: update on current treatments [J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg , 2012 , 29 ( 2 ): 205 - 220 . doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2012.01.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2012.01.007 .
Vosoughi AR , Borazjani R , Ghasemi N , et al . Different types and epidemiological patterns of calcaneal fractures based on reviewing CT images of 957 fractures [J]. Foot Ankle Surg , 2022 , 28 ( 1 ): 88 - 92 . doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.02.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.02.002 .
Baertl S , Alt V , Rupp M . Surgical enhancement of fracture healing-operative vs . nonoperative treatment [J]. Injury , 2021 , S2 : S12 - S17 . doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.049 .
Lewis SR , Pritchard MW , Solomon JL , et al . Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev , 2023 , 11 ( 11 ): CD008628 . doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008628.pub3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008628.pub3 .
Meena S , Hooda A , Sharma P , et al . Operative versus non operative treatment of displaced intraarticular fracture of calcaneum: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) , 2016 , 24 ( 3 ): 411 - 416 . doi: 10.1177/1602400328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1602400328 .
Driessen MLS , Verstappen C , Poeze M , et al . Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a single-center experience study with 20 years follow-up [J]. Injury , 2022 , 53 ( 10 ): 3535 - 3542 . doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.037 .
Attenasio A , Heiman E , Hong IS , et al . Postoperative wound complications in extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures: are we improving? Updated meta-analysis of recent literature [J]. Injury , 2024 , 55 ( 6 ): 111560 . doi: 10.1016/j. injury. 2024.111560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111560 .
Peng C , Yuan B , Guo W , et al . Extensile lateral versus sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures: a meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore) , 2021 , 100 ( 31 ): e26717 . doi: 10.1097/MD.000000000 0026717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026717 .
Seat A , Seat C . Lateral extensile approach versus minimal incision approach for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a meta-analysis [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg , 2020 , 59 ( 2 ): 356 - 366 . doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.08.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2019.08.007 .
Yu T , Xiong Y , Kang A , et al . Comparison of sinus tarsi approach and extensile lateral approach for calcaneal fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses [J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) , 2020 , 28 ( 2 ): 2309499020915282 . doi: 10.1177/23094990209 15282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499020915282 .
孔维杰 , 李晗 , 郝海虎 . 跗骨窦入路治疗跟骨关节内骨折研究进展 [J]. 国际骨科学杂志 , 2024 , 45 ( 3 ): 162 - 165 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2024.03.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2024.03.003 .
梁伟 , 邹光翼 , 王济纬 , 等 . 自制双边三角形万向可伸缩外固定支架治疗开放性关节内粉碎性跟骨骨折 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志 , 2016 , 18 ( 9 ): 809 - 813 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600. 2016. 09.014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2016.09.014 .
高彦军 , 张勇 , 赵廷虎 , 等 . 跟骨撑开器在微创内固定治疗跟骨骨折中的应用 [J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志 , 2017 , 32 ( 12 ): 1331 - 1332 . doi: 10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2017.12.039 http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2017.12.039 .
桑庆华 , 哈秀民 , 姜佩瑜 , 等 . 撑开器双向撑开辅助闭合复位微创接骨板内固定治疗跟骨骨折 [J]. 中国骨伤 , 2018 , 31 ( 7 ): 604 - 607 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.07.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.07.004 .
桑宝权 , 刘峰 . 外固定支架辅助复位联合经跗骨窦入路治疗跟骨骨折的研究 [J]. 现代医学 , 2021 , 49 ( 3 ): 300 - 303 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7562.2021.03.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7562.2021.03.010 .
Wang J , Qin S , Wang T , et al . Calcaneus traction compression with orthopaedic reduction forceps combined with percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures: an analysis of efficacy [J]. Biomed Pharmacother , 2020 , 128 : 110295 . doi: 10.1016/ j.biopha.2020.110295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110295 .
Wang C , Dong S , Li X , et al . Utility of 2.0 mm diameter Kirschner wires assembled with Wu´s Tension Traction Bows in calcaneal skeletal traction [J]. Sci Rep , 2024 , 14 ( 1 ): 16359 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67344-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67344-8 .
方玮 , 徐成振 , 苏志惠 , 等 . 撑开器复位联合经皮微创Y形钢板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效观察 [J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志 , 2024 , 39 ( 2 ): 212 - 215 . doi: 10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2024.02.026 http://dx.doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2024.02.026 .
Shannon SF , Houdek MT , Wyles CC , et al . Allgöwer-donati versus vertical mattress suture technique impact on perfusion in ankle fracture surgery: a randomized clinical trial using intraoperative angiography [J]. J Orthop Trauma , 2017 , 31 ( 2 ): 97 - 102 . doi: 10.1097/BOT. 0000000000000731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000731 .
Ni M , Lv ML , Sun W , et al . Fracture mapping of complex intra-articular calcaneal fractures [J]. Ann Transl Med , 2021 , 9 ( 4 ): 33 . doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7824 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7824 .
朱学敏 . 后距下关节面复位质量与跟骨骨折疗效的相关性研究 [D]. 广州 : 暨南大学 , 2014 . doi: 10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478. 2015. 16.02 http://dx.doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2015.16.02 .
黄辽江 . 跟骨外侧血供的应用解剖观察 [D]. 大连 : 大连医科大学 , 2006 .
Rickert MM , McKeithan LJ , Volkmar AJ , et al . Comparing calcaneus fracture radiographic outcomes and complications after percutaneous pin versus screw fixation [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg , 2023 , 62 ( 2 ): 365 - 370 . doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.005 .
Islam A , Mcdonald C , Aljawadi A , et al . Management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a comparative study of open and minimally invasive surgery [J]. Cureus , 2020 , 12 ( 8 ): e9547 . doi: 10.7759/cureus.9547 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9547 .
Martin K , Yoder RG . Calcaneus fracture and posterior arthroscopic primary subtalar arthrodesis (C-PASTA) [J]. JBJS Essent Surg Tech , 2022 , 12 ( 3 ): e21.00057 . doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00057 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00057 .
闫荣亮 , 曹立海 , 曲家富 , 等 . 跟骨外侧U形切口的设计及临床应用 [J]. 局解手术学杂志 , 2018 , 27 ( 11 ): 839 - 842 . doi: 10.11659/ jjssx.06E018020 http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.06E018020 .
Khazen G , Rassi CK . Sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures: the new gold standard? [J]. Foot Ankle Clin , 2020 , 25 ( 4 ): 667 - 681 . doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2020.08.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2020.08.003 .
Eelsing R , Aronius LB , Halm JA , et al . Implant choice and outcomes of the sinus tarsi approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures [J]. Foot Ankle Int , 2023 , 44 ( 8 ): 738 - 744 . doi: 10.1177/10711007231176276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10711007231176276 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621