
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
鄂州市中心医院妇科,湖北 鄂州 436000
南方,E-mail:847285973@qq.com
收稿日期:2024-05-22,
纸质出版日期:2025-06-25
移动端阅览
王红,程佳,黄志琴等.双镜联合憩室修补重建术治疗剖宫产子宫切口憩室的临床研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(06):501-504.
WANG Hong,CHENG Jia,HUANG Zhi-qin,et al.Clinical study of hysteroscopic combined with laparoscopic repair and reconstruction of diverticulum in the treatment of post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(06):501-504.
王红,程佳,黄志琴等.双镜联合憩室修补重建术治疗剖宫产子宫切口憩室的临床研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(06):501-504. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.05E024104.
WANG Hong,CHENG Jia,HUANG Zhi-qin,et al.Clinical study of hysteroscopic combined with laparoscopic repair and reconstruction of diverticulum in the treatment of post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(06):501-504. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.05E024104.
目的
2
观察双镜联合憩室修补重建术治疗剖宫产子宫切口憩室(PCSD)的临床效果。
方法
2
选取2020年1月至2022年2月我院妇产科收治的PCSD患者150例,根据手术方案不同分为经阴道组(经阴道憩室修补术)和双镜组(双镜联合憩室修补重建术),每组75例。记录2组患者手术一般情况、月经期天数、肌层厚度、炎症相关因子水平、并发症及有生育计划患者妊娠情况。
结果
2
双镜组患者手术时间长于经阴道组,肛门排气时间、术后住院时间均短于经阴道组,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);2组患者术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。2组患者术后7 d的高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-4(IL-4)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平均较术前降低,且双镜组低于经阴道组,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。与术前相比,2组患者术后6、12个月的月经期天数减少,肌层厚度增加,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);2组患者术后6、12个月的月经期天数、肌层厚度比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。2组患者切口感染、低钠血症、膀胱损伤、阴道感染等累计并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。双镜组有生育计划患者宫内妊娠率、足月妊娠率均高于经阴道组,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。2组患者流产率和早产率比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
双镜联合憩室修补重建术治疗PCSD患者术后恢复快,住院周期短,可提高有生育计划患者妊娠率。
Objective
2
To observe the clinical effect of hysteroscopic combined with laparoscopic repair and reconstruction of diverticulum in the treatment of post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum(PCSD).
Methods
2
A total of 150 patients with PCSD admitted to the department of gynaecology of our hospital from January 2020 to February 2022 were selected and divided into the transvaginal group (transvaginal repair of diverticulum) and the combined group (hysteroscopic combined with laparoscopic repair and reconstruction of diverticulum) according to different surgical plans,with 75 cases in each group. The general condition of surgery, days of menstrual period, thickness of muscular layer, inflammation-related factor levels, complications and pregnancy in patients with birth plan were recorded in both groups.
Results
2
The operation time of patients in the combined group was longer than that in the transvaginal group, and the time of anal exhaustion and postoperative hospital stay of patients in the combined group were shorter than those in the transvaginal group, the differences were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05);There was no significant difference in terms of the intraoperative bleeding volume of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) 7 days after surgery of patients were lower in both groups compared with those before surgery, and the combined group was lower than the transvaginal group, the differences were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). Compared with that before the surgery,the days of menstrual period of patietns in both groups 6 and 12 months after the surgery decreased,and the thickness of muscular layer increased,with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05); while no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the days of menstrual period or thickness of muscular layer of patients 6 and 12 months after surgery between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of cumulative complications such as incision infection, hyponatraemia, bladder injury and vaginal infection between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). The intrauterine pregnancy rate of patients with birth plan and the full-term pregnancy rate in the combined group were higher than those in the transvaginal group, the differences were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the abortion ra
te or preterm birth rate between the two groups (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The hysteroscopic combined with laparoscopic repair and reconstruction of diverticulum for patients with PCSD has a fast postoperative recovery, a short hospital stay, and can increase the pregnancy rate of patients with birth plan.
Regmi DR , Dangal G , Silwal A , et al . Repeat cesarean section among pregnant women in a tertiary center of nepal: a descriptive cross-sectional study [J]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc , 2022 , 60 ( 245 ): 6 - 11 . doi: 10.31729/jnma.6597 http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.6597 .
Yang X , Pan X , Cai M , et al . Microbial flora changes in cesarean section uterus and its possible correlation with inflammation [J]. Front Med (Lausanne) , 2021 , 8 ( 2 ): 651938 . doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021. 651938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.651938 .
Zhang NN , Wang GW , Yang Q . Endoscopic treatment of previous cesarean scar defect in women with postmenstrual bleeding: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Invest Surg , 2021 , 34 ( 10 ): 1147 - 1155 . doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1766161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2020.1766161 .
陈校丹 , 金小英 . 39例宫腔镜下子宫切口憩室开渠术的疗效分析 [J]. 浙江医学 , 2022 , 44 ( 2 ): 196 - 198 . doi: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2022.44.2.2021-2825 http://dx.doi.org/10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2022.44.2.2021-2825 .
Dai L , Wang H , Xing X , et al . An analysis of curative effect of combined transvaginal and hysteroscopic electrocauterization of partial endometrium to treat previous cesarean scar diverticulum [J]. Minerva Surg , 2022 , 77 ( 2 ): 139 - 146 . doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.21. 08999-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.21.08999-1 .
谢幸 , 苟文丽 . 妇产科学 [M]. 第8版 . 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2013 .
戴佳旸 , 郭璐 , 王圆圆 , 等 . 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室发生率及危险因素的Meta分析 [J]. 实用妇产科杂志 , 2023 , 39 ( 10 ): 780 - 786 .
刘鸽 . 不同月经模式子宫瘢痕憩室患者三维超声参数差异的研究 [J]. 实用妇产科杂志 , 2023 , 39 ( 8 ): 636 - 638 .
熊敏 , 卢白玉 , 刘晓芳 , 等 . 免气腹悬吊式单孔腹腔镜在全子宫及附件切除术中的应用效果 [J]. 局解手术学杂志 , 2023 , 32 ( 6 ): 511 - 515 . doi: 10.11659/jjssx.09E022064 http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.09E022064 .
李明全 , 娄晓宇 , 王冲 . MRI评估宫腔镜手术和宫腹腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室患者的效果 [J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志 , 2022 , 20 ( 3 ): 113 - 116 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2022. 03.038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2022.03.038 .
黄艳 , 彭超 , 陆叶 , 等 . 腹腔镜折叠对接缝合联合宫腔镜开渠法治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室 [J]. 中国微创外科杂志 , 2022 , 22 ( 4 ): 343 - 346 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2022.04.012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2022.04.012 .
Chueh HY , Pai AH , Su YY , et al . Hysteroscopic removal,with or without laparoscopic assistance,of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy [J]. Fertil Steril , 2022 , 117 ( 3 ): 643 - 645 . doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.027 .
Sako Y , Hirata T . Hysteroscopic management of uterine diverticulum after myomectomy: a case report [J]. BMC Womens Health , 2023 , 23 ( 1 ): 452 . doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02606-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02606-7 .
童胜利 , 罗挺 . 宫腹腔镜联合修补术对剖宫产后子宫切口瘢痕憩室的临床治疗效果 [J]. 中国妇幼保健 , 2021 , 36 ( 13 ): 2941 - 2944 . doi: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.13.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.13.005 .
李兰 , 余洁 , 杜世华 , 等 . 宫腹腔镜联合炔雌醇环丙孕酮治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的临床疗效 [J]. 安徽医学 , 2021 , 42 ( 10 ): 1106 - 1109 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.10.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.10.008 .
邓在洪 , 罗岳西 , 苏德艳 , 等 . 宫腹腔镜间断内翻缝合术在剖宫产手术切口憩室治疗中的应用效果观察 [J]. 山东医药 , 2023 , 63 ( 35 ): 62 - 65 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2023.35.014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2023.35.014 .
刘湛秋 , 何玉 , 王玲玲 . 宫腔镜联合腹腔镜下折叠缝合术治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的临床效果分析 [J]. 蚌埠医学院学报 , 2023 , 48 ( 12 ): 1705 - 1708 . doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023. 12.019 http://dx.doi.org/10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.12.019 .
Nezhat C , Zaghi B , Baek K , et al . Outcomes of laparoscopic cesarean scar defect repair: retrospective and observational study [J]. J Clin Med , 2023 , 12 ( 11 ): 3720 . doi: 10.3390/jcm12113720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113720 .
韩丹 , 冯力民 , 李海霞 , 等 . 腹腔镜下子宫动脉临时阻断辅助微创手术治疗Ⅱ型或Ⅲ型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药 , 2021 , 16 ( 11 ): 1700 - 1704 . doi: 10.3760/j.issn. 1673-4777.2021.11.023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2021.11.023 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621