
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁医院麻醉科,江苏 宿迁 223800
2.徐州医科大学麻醉药理学教研室,江苏 徐州 221004
顾克,E-mail:1181031213@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2025-02-25,
收稿日期:2024-04-24,
移动端阅览
王浩, 顾克, 饶丽华, 等. 不同CO2气腹压力对超重或肥胖患者Trendelenburg体位腹腔镜全子宫切除术的影响[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2025,34(2):150-153.
WANG HAO, GU KE, RAO LI-HUA, et al. Effects of different CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressures on overweight or obese patients with laparoscopic panhysterectomy in Trendelenburg position. [J]. Journal of regional anatomy and operative surgery, 2025, 34(2): 150-153.
王浩, 顾克, 饶丽华, 等. 不同CO2气腹压力对超重或肥胖患者Trendelenburg体位腹腔镜全子宫切除术的影响[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2025,34(2):150-153. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.04E024121.
WANG HAO, GU KE, RAO LI-HUA, et al. Effects of different CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressures on overweight or obese patients with laparoscopic panhysterectomy in Trendelenburg position. [J]. Journal of regional anatomy and operative surgery, 2025, 34(2): 150-153. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.04E024121.
目的
2
探讨术中不同CO
2
气腹压力对超重或肥胖患者Trendelenburg体位腹腔镜下行全子宫切除术的影响。
方法
2
选择腹腔镜下行全子宫切除的超重或肥胖患者88例,按照随机数字表法分为低压组和高压组,每组44例。所有患者术中均以CO
2
为气腹介质,低压组患者CO
2
气腹压力为10 mmH
g,高压组患者CO
2
气腹压力为15 mmHg。比较2组患者的手术相关指标、呼吸指标、鼻咽温和不良反应发生情况。
结果
2
2组患者的手术时间、出血量、术中输液量及脏器损伤、中转开腹手术发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05);低压组患者麻醉苏醒时间短于高压组(
P
<
0.05)。建立气腹30 min时,高压组患者的气道峰压(Ppeak)和气道平台压(Pplat)均明显高于低压组(
P
<
0.05),肺动态顺应性(Cdyn)明显低于低压组(
P
<
0.05)。在建立气腹60 min和气腹结束时,高压组患者的鼻咽温均显著低于低压组(
P
<
0.05)。高压组术中低体温和寒战反应发生率均明显高于低压组(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
相对于使用15 mmHg CO
2
气腹压力Trendelenburg体位行腹腔镜下全子宫切除的超重或肥胖患者,10 mmHg CO
2
气腹压力不会增加手术难度,且患者术中气道压较低、肺顺应性好、不良反应少、苏醒快,还可避免术中体温过低。
Objective
2
To explore the effects of different CO
2
pneumoperitoneum pressures during surgery on overweight or obese patients with laparoscopic panhysterectomy in Trendelenburg position.
Methods
2
A total of 88 overweight or obese patients who underwent laparoscopic panhysterectomy were selected and randomly divided into the low-pressure group and the high-pressure group according to random number table method,with 44 patients in each group. All patients used CO
2
as the pneumoperitoneum medium during surgery,with 10 mmHg of CO
2
pneumoperitoneum pressure in the low-pressure group and 15 mmHg of CO
2
pneumoperitoneum pressure in the high-pressure group. The operation-related indexes,respiratory indicators,nasopharyngeal temperature and adverse reactions of patients were compared between the two groups.
Results
2
There was no significant difference in the surgical time,blood loss,intraoperative infusion volume,incidence of organ injury,and laparotomy rate between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). The recovery time of anesthesia of patients in the low-pressure group was shorter than that in the high-pressure group (
P
<
0.05).At 30 minutes after the establishment of pn
eumoperitoneum,the peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and plateau pressure (Pplat) of patients in the high-pressure group were significantly higher than those in the low-pressure group (
P
<
0.05),while the dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) of patients in the high-pressure group was significantly lower than that in the low-pressure group (
P
<
0.05).At 60 minutes after the establishment of pneumoperitoneum and the end of pneumoperitoneum, the nasopharyngeal temperature of patients in the high-pressure group were significantly lower than those in the low-pressure group (
P
<
0.05). The incidences of intraoperative hypothermia and shivering in the high-pressure group were significantly higher than those in the low-pressure group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Compared with 15 mmHg of CO
2
pneumoperitoneum pressure,10 mmHg of CO
2
pneumoperitoneum pressure on overweight or obese patients with laparoscopic panhysterectomy in Trendelenburg position does not increase surgical difficulty,and the patients has lower airway pressure,better lung compliance,fewer adverse reactions,and faster recovery,which can also avoid intraoperative hypothermia.
CO2气腹超重肥胖腹腔镜全子宫切除低体温Trendelenburg体位
CO2 pneumoperitoneumoverweightobesitylaparoscopepanhysterectomyhypothermiaTrendelenburg position
Ma SJ,Xi B,Yang L,et al. Trends in the prevalence of overweight,obesity,and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults between 1993 and 2015[J].Int J Obes (Lond),2021,45(2): 427-437.doi:10.1038/s41366-020-00698-xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00698-x.
龙鼎德,胡春华,谌雅雨.肺保护通气策略在肥胖患者全麻手术的应用进展[J].广东医学,2018,39(19):2985-2988.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2018.19.033http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2018.19.033.
张文文,徐亚杰,曹媛媛,等. 肥胖患者S型可视喉镜引导气管插管的效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志,2021,41(4):504-505.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20201217.00427http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20201217.00427.
Hedenstierna G,Tokics L,Reinius H,et al. Higher age and obesity limit atelectasis formation during anaesthesia: an analysis of computed tomographydata in 243 subjects[J]. Br J Anaesth,2020,124(3):336-344.doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.11.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.11.026.
Emile SH,Elgamal M,Elshobaky A,et al.Identifying patients at high risk of having pulmonary dysfunction before laparoscopic bariatric surgery and its impact on postoperative pulmonary complications[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2019,29(11):1456-1461.doi:10.1089/lap.2019.0459http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0459.
楼海霞,徐丽丽,李伟燕.反比通气在肥胖患者妇科腔镜手术中对呼吸功能的影响[J].浙江医学,2021,43(16):1765-1767.doi:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2021.43.16.2021-984http://dx.doi.org/10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2021.43.16.2021-984.
严志勇,樊倩楠,苏小虎,等.不同CO2气腹压力对老年肥胖患者全身麻醉行腹腔镜下子宫切除的影响[J].局解手术学杂志,2022,31(5):439-442.doi:10.11659/jjssx.12E021100http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.12E021100
武子先,王海波,胡晓丽,等.经脐单切口腹腔镜手术在肥胖患者全子宫切除术中的临床疗效及机制研究[J].解放军医药杂志,2021,33(7):82-86.doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-140X.2021.07.019http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-140X.2021.07.019.
朱梦秋,易倩琳,武加林,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜关于全子宫切除术在不同体质指数患者中的对比研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2024,49(1):70-74.doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003401http://dx.doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003401.
朱丽萍,王凡,张传武,等.反比通气对病态肥胖患者腹腔镜袖状胃减容术呼吸力学和术后肺部并发症的影响[J].医学研究杂志,2024,53(1):165-169.doi:10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2024.01.033http://dx.doi.org/10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2024.01.033.
丁宁静,余琼.肥胖患者接受腹腔镜下袖状胃切除术的肺通气策略[J].中国临床医学,2023,30(5):840-845.doi:10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2023.20231089http://dx.doi.org/10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2023.20231089.
刘秀,孔贯详,季小青,等.不同CO2气腹压力对腹腔镜疝修补术老年患者认知功能及呼吸指标的影响[J].局解手术学杂志,2022,31(8):698-701.doi:10.11659/jjssx.02E022052http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.02E022052.
陈雪,张晓洁,饶丽华,等.不同体质量指数老年病人全麻腹腔镜下子宫切除术术中低体温的发生情况[J].实用老年医学,2023,37(5):505-508.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.05.017http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.05.017.
叶青青,陈悦,吴浩,等.老年患者全身麻醉腹腔镜下子宫切除术中低体温发生情况及危险因素[J].局解手术学杂志,2023,32(2):125-128.doi:10.11659/jjssx.08E022146http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.08E022146.
刘英,杨燕,赵泽宇.气腹因素对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术老年患者麻醉恢复期神经认知紊乱的影响[J].重庆医学,2022,51(13):2227-2231.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2022.13.014http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2022.13.014.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621