
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University,Zhejiang,Hangzhou,China,310003
2. DAMO Academy, Alibaba Group,NY,New York,USA,10014
3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital,Tianjin,China,300070
4. Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University,Zhejiang,Wenzhou,China,325000
5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Hospital,Zhejiang,Taizhou,China,317000
6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital,Jiangsu,Nanjing,China,210019
7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital,Jiangsu,Nanjing,China,210008
8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital,Shanxi,Taiyuan,China,030013
9. Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinan JunXin Med,Shandong,Jinan,China,250001
10. Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University,Gansu,Lanzhou,China,730000
11. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau SAR,China,999078
12. Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing,China,101149
13. Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital & Institute
14. Cancer Hospital of China Medical University
15. Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology
16. Faculty of Medicine, Dalian University of Technology,Liaoning,Shenyang,China,110042
收稿:2024-09-05,
网络首发:2024-12-07,
纸质出版:2025-01-15
移动端阅览
Xianghua Ye, Dazhou Guo, Lujun Zhao, 等. Development and validation of AI delineation of the thoracic RTOG organs at risk with deep learning on multi-institutional datasets[J]. 智能肿瘤学, 2025,1(1):61-71.
Xianghua Ye, Dazhou Guo, Lujun Zhao, et al. Development and validation of AI delineation of the thoracic RTOG organs at risk with deep learning on multi-institutional datasets[J]. Intelligent Oncology, 2025, 1(1): 61-71.
Xianghua Ye, Dazhou Guo, Lujun Zhao, 等. Development and validation of AI delineation of the thoracic RTOG organs at risk with deep learning on multi-institutional datasets[J]. 智能肿瘤学, 2025,1(1):61-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.intonc.2024.12.001.
Xianghua Ye, Dazhou Guo, Lujun Zhao, et al. Development and validation of AI delineation of the thoracic RTOG organs at risk with deep learning on multi-institutional datasets[J]. Intelligent Oncology, 2025, 1(1): 61-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.intonc.2024.12.001.
IntroductionAccurate contouring of thoracic organs at risk (OARs) is essential for minimizing complications in radiation treatment. Manual contouring of thoracic OARs is not only time-consuming but also prone to substantial user variation. To enhance the efficiency and consistency
we developed a unified deep learning (DL) OAR contouring model
DeepOAR
that was trained using multiple partially labeled datasets for segmenting a comprehensive set of thoracic OARs following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-guided OAR atlas. This DL model supports the segmentation of six required and eight optional OARs guided by the NRG-RTOG 1106 trial
providing precise and reproducible OARs contouring that are ready to be used in radiotherapy practice.Materials and methodsFollowing the OAR contouring recommendation of the NRG-RTOG 1106 trial
we collected and curated three private datasets and two public datasets
comprising a total of 531 patients with partially annotated thoracic OARs. These partially annotated datasets were utilized to develop DeepOAR
which consisted of a shared encoder and 14 separate decoders
with each decoder dedicated to one specific OAR. For model training
we utilized all patients from the two public datasets and 75% of the patients from the private datasets. We reserved the remaining 25% of the private datasets for independent testing. A multi-user study involving 21 radiation oncologists was conducted on 40 randomly selected patients from the independent testing dataset to evaluate the clinical applicability of DeepOAR. The Dice coefficient score (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD) were computed to evaluate the quantitative delineation performance of the model.ResultsDeepOAR outperformed nnUNet (the benchmark medical segmentation model) across all 14 OARs
achieving mean DSC and ASD values of 88.4% and 1.0 mm
respectively
in the independent testing set. Multi-user validation demonstrated that 89.7% of DeepOAR-generated OARs were clinically acceptable or required only minor revisions. A comparison using two randomly selected patients showed that the delineation variability of DeepOAR was significantly smaller than the inter-user variation among radiation oncologists. Human editing of DeepOAR’s predictions could further improve OAR delineation accuracy by an average of 3% increase in DSC and 40% reduction in ASD while significantly reducing the workload of radiation oncologists for contouring 14 thoracic OARs by an average of 77.0%.ConclusionWe developed DeepOAR
a DL-based unified contouring model trained using multiple partially labeled datasets
to delineate a comprehensive set of 14 thoracic OARs following the RTOG-guided OAR atlas. Both qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated the strong clinical applicability of DeepOAR for the OAR delineation process in thoracic cancer radiotherapy workflows
along with improved efficiency
comprehensiveness
and quality.
IntroductionAccurate contouring of thoracic organs at risk (OARs) is essential for minimizing complications in radiation treatment. Manual contouring of thoracic OARs is not only time-consuming but also prone to substantial user variation. To enhance the efficiency and consistency
we developed a unified deep learning (DL) OAR contouring model
DeepOAR
that was trained using multiple partially labeled datasets for segmenting a comprehensive set of thoracic OARs following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-guided OAR atlas. This DL model supports the segmentation of six required and eight optional OARs guided by the NRG-RTOG 1106 trial
providing precise and reproducible OARs contouring that are ready to be used in radiotherapy practice.Materials and methodsFollowing the OAR contouring recommendation of the NRG-RTOG 1106 trial
we collected and curated three private datasets and two public datasets
comprising a total of 531 patients with partially annotated thoracic OARs. These partially annotated datasets were utilized to develop DeepOAR
which consisted of a shared encoder and 14 separate decoders
with each decoder dedicated to one specific OAR. For model training
we utilized all patients from the two public datasets and 75% of the patients from the private datasets. We reserved the remaining 25% of the private datasets for independent testing. A multi-user study involving 21 radiation oncologists was conducted on 40 randomly selected patients from the independent testing dataset to evaluate the clinical applicability of DeepOAR. The Dice coefficient score (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD) were computed to evaluate the quantitative delineation performance of the model.ResultsDeepOAR outperformed nnUNet (the benchmark medical segmentation model) across all 14 OARs
achieving mean DSC and ASD values of 88.4% and 1.0 mm
respectively
in the independent testing set. Multi-user validation demonstrated that 89.7% of DeepOAR-generated OARs were clinically acceptable or required only minor revisions. A comparison using two randomly selected patients showed that the delineation variability of DeepOAR was significantly smaller than the inter-user variation among radiation oncologists. Human editing of DeepOAR’s predictions could further improve OAR delineation accuracy by an average of 3% increase in DSC and 40% reduction in ASD while significantly reducing the workload of radiation oncologists for contouring 14 thoracic OARs by an average of 77.0%.ConclusionWe developed DeepOAR
a DL-based unified contouring model trained using multiple partially labeled datasets
to delineate a comprehensive set of 14 thoracic OARs following the RTOG-guided OAR atlas. Both qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated the strong clinical applicability of DeepOAR for the OAR delineation process in thoracic cancer radiotherapy workflows
along with improved efficiency
comprehensiveness
and quality.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621