CAO LILI, XU HUICHENG, WANG YANZHOU. Laparoscopic retropubic bladder neck suspension (Burch) vs mid-urethral suspension in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2011, 33(24): 2607-2610.
CAO LILI, XU HUICHENG, WANG YANZHOU. Laparoscopic retropubic bladder neck suspension (Burch) vs mid-urethral suspension in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2011, 33(24): 2607-2610.DOI:
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic retropubic bladder neck suspension (Burch) and mid-urethral suspension(MUS) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) so as to clarify the clinical value of two kinds of suspender surgery. Methods Clinical data of 114 SUI cases who were operated in our department during January 2005 to June 2010 were retros
pective analyzed. Among them
59 patients received laparoscopic Burch
and the other 55 cases mid-urethral suspension. Their perioperative situation and surgery efficiency were compared. Results In the mean follow-up time of 33 months (ranging from 12 to 77 months)
the overall response rate were 93% (40/43) and 100% (51/51) respectively in laparoscopic Burch and MUS surgery
with no significant difference (
P
>0.05). The cure rates were 53.5% (23/43) and 84.3% (43/51) respectively
with significant difference between them (
P
<
0.05). In laparoscopic Burch group
bladder vaginal fistula occurred in 1 case
suture erosion into the bladder in 2 cases
dysuria in 1 case
and incomplete unilateral ureteral obstruction in 1 case. While no severe complication was found in MUS group. Among the 42 cases which were independently performed for suspender surgery
besides the operating time longer in the laparoscopic Burch group than in MUS group
there was no significant difference in other surgical parameters (
P
>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic Burch surgery has wild range of indications
but longer operative time
more blood loss
slower postoperative recovery times
but lower cost of hospitalization when compared with MUS. MUS is a simple
safe surgery with high efficacy
quick recovery
shorter indwelling catheter and hospital stay
less postoperative complications and voiding dysfunction