IDEAL与3D FSE-Cube序列正常臂丛节后神经成像对比研究

李鹏; 吕发金; 彭聪; 张丹; 王筱璇; 刘丹

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

IDEAL与3D FSE-Cube序列正常臂丛节后神经成像对比研究

论著 | 更新时间：2025-01-15

- IDEAL与3D FSE-Cube序列正常臂丛节后神经成像对比研究
- Comparison of IDEAL and 3D FSE-Cube sequences for normal postganglionic brachial plexus
- 陆军军医大学学报 2013年35卷第6期页码：553-557
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  中图分类号： R813;R445.2;R322.85
- 纸质出版日期：2013，
  
  网络出版日期：2013-03-30，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李鹏, 吕发金, 彭聪, 等. IDEAL与3D FSE-Cube序列正常臂丛节后神经成像对比研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2013,35(6):553-557.

LI PENG, LU FAJIN, PENG CONG, et al. Comparison of IDEAL and 3D FSE-Cube sequences for normal postganglionic brachial plexus. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2013, 35(6): 553-557.
李鹏, 吕发金, 彭聪, 等. IDEAL与3D FSE-Cube序列正常臂丛节后神经成像对比研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2013,35(6):553-557. DOI：

LI PENG, LU FAJIN, PENG CONG, et al. Comparison of IDEAL and 3D FSE-Cube sequences for normal postganglionic brachial plexus. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2013, 35(6): 553-557. DOI：

摘要

目的比较IDEAL序列及3D FSE-Cube序列臂丛节后神经成像图像质量。方法利用3.0T磁共振对30名志愿者采用IDEAL序列及3D FSE-Cube序列进行臂丛节后神经成像，每名志愿者在进行3D FSE-Cube序列扫描时均进行两次扫描，第2次使用了自制匀场辅助装置。将所得图像进行MIP、CPR等后处理，计算两种序列臂丛神经各水平显示率，进行神经成像质量评分，测量神经、肌肉、背景噪声信号

并计算神经信噪比（SNR）及对比噪声比(CNR)。结果使用辅助装置前3D FSE-Cube序列臂丛神经神经节、锁骨上区神经、锁骨下区神经显示率分别为73.33%、56.67%、40.00%，使用辅助装置后为100.00%、97.67%、93.33%，两组间差异有统计学意义（

0.05）；IDEAL与3D FSE-Cube序列神经节显示率分别为96.67%、100.00%，锁骨上区神经显示率分别为86.67%、96.67%，差异均无统计学意义（

>0.05），锁骨下区神经显示率分别为70.00%及93.33%，3D FSE-Cube序列显著高于IDEAL序列（

0.05）；两序列神经节水平成像质量无显著差异（

>0.05），斜角肌水平、胸锁关节水平、腋动脉水平3D FSE-Cube序列神经成像质量优于IDEAL序列（

0.05）；IDEAL序列神经节水平神经信号高于3D FSE-Cube序列（

0.05），斜角肌水平、胸锁关节水平、腋动脉水平两组间差异无统计学意义（

>0.05）；IDEAL序列信噪比及对比噪声比均高于3D FSE-Cube序列（

0.01）。结论 IDEAL序列和3D FSE-Cube序列均能清晰的显示节后臂丛神经，3D FSE-Cube序列结合使用匀场辅助装置具有更高的神经成像质量。

Abstract

Objective To compare the sequences of iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetric and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) and 3D FSE-Cube imaging of

brachial plexus. Methods Brachial plexus of 30 health volunteers were imaged on 3.0T MR system with sequences of 3D FSE-Cube and IDEAL respectively. All of the volunteers underwent the same MR scanning for 2 times with 3D FSE-Cube sequence with the assistive device was used in the second time. Images were post-processed with MIP and CPR

and then the display rate was calculated

and image quality was assessed

signal noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Results The display rates of the ganglion

supra clavicular nerve

and infra clavicular nerve on 3D FSE-Cube sequence were 73.33%

56.67% and 40.00% respectively

while the rates were 100.00%

97.67% and 93.33% respectively after use of the assistive device

with statistically difference between them (

0.05). The display rate of ganglion were 96.67% and 100.00% on IDEAL and 3D FSE-Cube respectively

and that of supra clavicular nerve was 86.67% and 96.67%

respectively

but there was no significantly difference in both of them (

>0.05). The infra clavicular nerve was shown better on 3D FSE-Cube than IDEAL (93.33%

70.00%

0.05）. In levels of ganglion

the imaging quality on IDEAL and 3D FSE-Cube had no significant difference（

>0.05）. In the levels of interscalene area

costoclavicular space

and axillary

the quality of 3D FSE-Cube was better than IDEAL (

0.05). In the level of ganglion

the signals of IDEAL were higher than those of 3D FSE-Cube (

0.05). There was no significant difference in other level of brachial plexus between the 2 sequences (

>0.05). SNR and CNR were both higher in IDEAL than in 3D FSE-Cube (

0.01). Conclusion The sequences of IDEAL and 3D FSE-Cube both have the capacity of clearly displaying postganglionic brachial plexus

But the imaging quality of 3D FSE-Cube is better when combined with assistive device.

关键词

臂丛神经磁共振成像磁化率伪影

Keywords

brachial plexusmagnetic resonance imagingmagnetic susceptibility artifact

references

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

骨髓间充质干细胞成神经分化中的FTH1基因表达

氨基质子转移成像在鉴别脑内转移瘤和高级别胶质瘤中的应用价值