
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
王磊,张晶轩,杨国愉,杨梦滔,吴高杰,王皖曦,赵梦雪,王立菲,杨春丽,王菲菲,徐文佳.不同信息框架下军校学员特质焦虑及人格特征对风险决策的影响[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(20):2236-2239.
Wang Lei,Zhang Jingxuan,Yang Guoyu,Yang Mengtao,Wu Gaojie,Wang Wanxi,Zhao Mengxue,Wang Lifei,Yang Chunli,Wang Feifei,Xu Wenjia.Effects of trait anxiety and personality characteristics on risk decision making under different frames of information[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(20):2236-2239.
王磊,张晶轩,杨国愉,杨梦滔,吴高杰,王皖曦,赵梦雪,王立菲,杨春丽,王菲菲,徐文佳.不同信息框架下军校学员特质焦虑及人格特征对风险决策的影响[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(20):2236-2239. DOI:
Wang Lei,Zhang Jingxuan,Yang Guoyu,Yang Mengtao,Wu Gaojie,Wang Wanxi,Zhao Mengxue,Wang Lifei,Yang Chunli,Wang Feifei,Xu Wenjia.Effects of trait anxiety and personality characteristics on risk decision making under different frames of information[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(20):2236-2239. DOI:
目的 探讨不同信息框架下军校学员特质焦虑及人格特征对风险决策的影响。方法采用自编的风险决策问卷、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)和状态特质焦虑量表(STAI),对某军校403名学员进行团体心理测评,分析不同信息框架下风险决策的差异。结果①正性信息框架下32.18%的被试倾向于保守,67.82%的被试倾向于冒险;负性信息框架下20.63%的被试倾向于保守,79.37%的被试倾向于冒险,两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。男性在负性信息框架下80.71%的被试倾向冒险,而在正性信息框架下仅有67.55%的被试倾向冒险,两组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05);女性两组之间决策差异没有统计学意义(P0.05)。②正性信息框架下,高神经质的被试24.19%倾向于保守方案,75.81%倾向于冒险;低神经质的被试有46.00%倾向于保守,54.00%的被试倾向于冒险,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。负性信息框架下,两组间比较,决策差异没有统计学意义(P0.05);无论正性还是负性信息框架,内外向人格的风险决策差异均没有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论负面框架下军校学员个体更倾向于冒险决策,正性信息框架下高神经质人群倾向于冒险决策。
Objective To investigate the effects of trait anxiety and personality characteristics on risk decision making under different frames of information. Methods A self-designed risk decision questionnaire
Eysenck personality questionnaire(EPQ) and the state-trait anxiety inventory(STAI) were surveyed in 403 subjects from a military university. The subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups
the positive frame group (n=202) and the negative frame group (n=189)
through the cluster sampling. A Chi-square test was conducted between the 2 groups for statistical analysis. Results ①Under positive information frame
32.18% of the subjects tended to be conservative and 67.82% of them were prone to be risky. Under negative information frame
the percentage of being conservative and risky were 20.63% and 79.37%.The difference between the 2 information frames was statistically significant(P0.05). Under negative information frame
80.71% of men chose to take risks
but it dropped to 67.55% under positive frame information. The decision change under the 2 information frames was significantly different in men (P0.05)
but not in women. ②Under positive information frame
24.19% of high neurotic subjects were conservative
while 75.81% of them were risky. For low neurotic subjects
the percentage were 46.00% and 54.00%. The difference in decision making under different information frames were significant (P0.05). Under negative information frame
there was no significant difference between the high and low neurotic groups. Moreover
in either frame
no significant difference in decision making was found between the introverted and extroverted personalities. Conclusion Under negative information frame
the military individuals are more likely to take risks.Under positive information frame
subjects with high neurotic personality are more related to risk decision making behavior.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621