
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
陈秀秀,左昕,彭李,于永菊,刘波涛,边晨,李敏.某部新兵集训期心理状况与情绪调节方式及认知偏向的关系[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(16):1900-1904.
Chen Xiuxiu,Zuo Xin,Peng Li,Yu Yongju,Liu Botao,Bian Chen,Li Min.Relationship of mental status with emotion regulation and cognitive bias in a troop of recruits during training[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(16):1900-1904.
陈秀秀,左昕,彭李,于永菊,刘波涛,边晨,李敏.某部新兵集训期心理状况与情绪调节方式及认知偏向的关系[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(16):1900-1904. DOI:
Chen Xiuxiu,Zuo Xin,Peng Li,Yu Yongju,Liu Botao,Bian Chen,Li Min.Relationship of mental status with emotion regulation and cognitive bias in a troop of recruits during training[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(16):1900-1904. DOI:
目的 研究某部新兵集训2个月时应激水平、情绪体验特点与情绪调节方式和认知偏向的关系。方法 采用心理应激自评问卷(psychological stress self-evaluation test,PSET)、正性负性情感量表(positive and negative affect scale,PANAS)、情绪调节方式问卷(emotion regulation scale,ERS)和正性负性认知偏向量表(attention to positive and negative inventory scale,APNIS)对某部集训期新兵1 600人进行整群抽样调查。 结果 ①某部新兵心理应激T分为(50.04±10.00)。不同文化程度新兵心理应激水平差异有统计学意义(F=3.25,P0.05)。②心理应激高分组在负性情绪、负性认知偏向和表达抑制上均显著高于心理应激低分组(P0.01),在正性情绪、正性认知偏向和认知重评上显著低于低分组(P0.01)。③总体心理应激水平与正性情绪、正性认知偏向和认知重评呈显著负相关(r值分别为-0.49、-0.32、-0.21,P0.01);与负性情绪、负性认知偏向和表达抑制呈显著正相关(r值分别为0.48、0.34、0.12,P0.01)。④正性情绪、负性情绪、负性认知偏向和正性认知偏向可有效预测心理应激水平,总解释率为37.6%。⑤认知重评在正性情绪与心理应激水平之间起调节作用。 结论 新兵的心理应激水平与情绪体验特点、情绪调节方式之间密切相关。
Objective investigate the mental status and its relationship with emotion regulation and cognitive bias in a troop of recruits during training. Methods Psychological stress selfevaluation test (PSET)
positive and negative affect scale (PANAS)
emotion regulation scale (ERS) and attention to positive and negative inventory scale (APNIS) were applied to the investigation of 1 600 recruits during training. Results T score of PSET in the recruits was 50.04±10.00. The recruits with different cultural levels had significant differences in psychological stress (F=3.25
P0.05). The recruits with higher psychological stress levels had higher negative emotion
negative cognitive bias and expression suppression (P0.01)
but lower positive emotion
positive cognitive bias and cognitive reappraisal than the ones with lower psychological stress levels(P0.01). The total score of psychological stress was negatively correlated with positive emotion
positive cognitive bias and cognitive reappraisal (r=-0.49
-0.32 and -0.21
respectively
P0.01)
but was positively correlated with negative emotion
negative cognitive bias and expression suppression (r=0.48
0.34 and 0.12
respectively
P0.01). Positive emotion
negative emotion
positive cognitive bias and negative cognitive bias were important predictors of psychological stress
and could explain 37.6% variance of psychological stress. Cognitive reappraisal regulated the relationship between positive emotion and psychological stress. Conclusion There are close correlations between the psychological stress levels and the characteristics of emotional experience and emotion regulation in the recruits. Active psychological training and emotion regulation training will help to reduce psychological stress levels during the training of the recruits
and promote mental health.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621