
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
张世昌,杨倩,于永菊,彭李,刘波涛,边晨,李敏.某部新兵集训期应激水平和情绪体验与注意偏向特点的关系[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(13):1577-1580.
Zhang Shichang,Yang Qian,Yu Yongju,Peng Li,Liu Botao,Bian Chen,Li Min.Relationship of training stress levels and emotional experience with characteristics of attentional bias in new recruits[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(13):1577-1580.
张世昌,杨倩,于永菊,彭李,刘波涛,边晨,李敏.某部新兵集训期应激水平和情绪体验与注意偏向特点的关系[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(13):1577-1580. DOI:
Zhang Shichang,Yang Qian,Yu Yongju,Peng Li,Liu Botao,Bian Chen,Li Min.Relationship of training stress levels and emotional experience with characteristics of attentional bias in new recruits[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(13):1577-1580. DOI:
目的 探索新兵集训期应激水平和情绪体验与注意偏向特点的关系。 方法 采用正/负性认知偏向量表(attention to positive and negative information scale,APNIS)、正负性情绪量表(positive and negative affect scale,PANAS)和军人心理应激自评问卷(psychological stress self-evaluation test,PSET)对某部集训新兵1 600人进行调查。 结果 ①新兵的应激水平总分为(50.01±10.00)分,其中应激水平低于50分者818人(51.12%);轻度应激(50~60分)者584人(36.5%);中度应激(61~69分)者134人(8.38%);重度应激(≥70分)者64人(4%)。 ②新兵应激水平和消极情感得分与负性认知偏向呈显著正相关(r为0.30~0.34,P0.05);应激水平和积极情感因子分与正性认知偏向呈显著负相关(r=-0.33,-0.32,P0.05);③不同应激水平的新兵注意偏向特点具有统计学差异(P0.05),应激水平越高的新兵正性认知偏向得分越低、负性认知偏向得分越高。④不同文化程度水平的新兵的应激水平和正性认知偏向也具有统计学差异(P0.01)表现为文化水平越高的新兵应激水平越低,越倾向于正性认知偏向。⑤负性认知偏向、正性认知偏向、积极情感和消极情感可以有效预测应激水平,解释率为37.4%。 结论 新兵在集训期间的应激水平和情感体验与注意偏向特点关系密切。正性认知偏向个体的应激水平普遍低于负性认知偏向的个体,并且也具有较多的积极情绪。
Objective To investigate the relationship of stress and emotional experience with attention bias in the new recruits during the training period. Methods Attention to positive and negative information scale (APNIS)
positive and negative affect scale (PANANS) and military psychological stress Self Rating Questionnaire (PSET ) were applied to survey 1 600 new recruits in the training period. Results ①The mean stress level was 50.01±10.00 for the new recruits. There were 818 subjects (51.12%) with non-stress levels (50)
584 (36.5 %) with mild stress (50~60)
134 (8.38%) with moderate stress (61~69)
and 64 (4.00%) with severe stress (≥70). ②Negative attention bias was positively correlated with stress level and negative emotion scores in the subjects (correlation coefficient=0.30~0.34
P0.05)
and positive attention bias was negatively correlated with stress level and positive emotion scores in the subjects (correlation coefficient=-0.33
-0.32
P0.05). ③The characteristics of attentional bias were significantly different in the recruits with different stress levels (P0.05)
with those with higher stress level having lower positive cognitive bias and higher negative cognitive bias. ④Significantly differences were seen in stress level and positive cognitive bias among the recruits with different educational levels (P0.01). The subjects with higher educational levels had lower stress levels and were more inclined to positive cognitive bias. ⑤The negative cognitive bias
positive cognitive bias
positive emotion and negative emotion could predict the stress level
with an explained variance of 37.4%. Conclusion The stress level and emotional experience are closely associated to their characteristics of attentional bias among the new recruits during training. The stress level is generally lower in the subjects having positive cognitive bias than those negative
and the former subjects also have more positive emotions.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621