
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
蒋鲜,曹富丽,但小苹,杨再兴,熊玮.哮喘患者治疗前后血循环中嗜酸性粒细胞微粒的变化[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(07):753-756.
Jiang Xian,Cao Fuli,Dan Xiaoping,Yang Zaixing,Xiong Wei.Alteration of circulating eosinophila microparticles in asthmatic patients before and after treatment[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(07):753-756.
蒋鲜,曹富丽,但小苹,杨再兴,熊玮.哮喘患者治疗前后血循环中嗜酸性粒细胞微粒的变化[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(07):753-756. DOI:
Jiang Xian,Cao Fuli,Dan Xiaoping,Yang Zaixing,Xiong Wei.Alteration of circulating eosinophila microparticles in asthmatic patients before and after treatment[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(07):753-756. DOI:
目的 初步探讨哮喘患者治疗前后血循环中嗜酸性粒细胞微粒的变化,分析其数目变化与治疗疗效之间可能的关系。 方法 按照入组标准纳入研究对象共57例,其中哮喘患者32例,健康志愿者25例,采集外周静脉血,将所采集的样本进行离心处理后,用相应抗体标记,应用流式细胞仪检测每100 μL外周血上清液中嗜酸性粒细胞微粒的数目。哮喘组在正规抗哮喘治疗(以吸入型糖皮质激素+长效β2受体激动剂为主)3个月后再次抽取相同体积的静脉血,检测血嗜酸性粒细胞微粒数目。 结果 哮喘组治疗前循环中嗜酸性粒细胞微粒数目显著高于健康对照组和治疗后(F=5.532 P=0.038;Z=-4.937,P=0.01),哮喘组治疗后与对照组间微粒数目差异无统计学意义(F=3.118,P=0.102)。对哮喘组进行亚组分析,微粒数目在哮喘过敏组和非过敏组间差异无统计学意义(t=0.421,P=0.677;t=0.006,P=0.952),在哮喘治疗后良好控制组与未控制组间差异有统计学意义(t=-2.086,P=0.046),Δ微粒与ΔFEV1、ΔFEV1%、ΔEos count、ΔFeNO、ΔACT呈线性相关(r=-0.558,P=0.01;r=-0.453,P=0.005;r=0.625,P=0.01;r=0.313,P=0.041;r=-0.399,P=0.012)。 结论 哮喘患者血循环中嗜酸性粒细胞微粒数目增多,治疗后微粒数目减少,动态监测血循环中嗜酸性粒细胞微粒有助于哮喘控制评估。
Objective To explore the changes of circulating eosinophila microparticles in the patients with asthma
and investigate the relationship of the changes with treatment efficacy. Methods Fifty-seven outpatients of our department from April to September 2015 who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. They were 32 patients of the asthma group and 25 of the normal control group. Their peripheral venous blood samples were collected
centrifuged and then marked with corresponding antibodies. Then the numbers of eosinophila microparticles in every 100 μL supernate was determined by flow cytometry. After 3 months of regular anti-asthmatic treatment (inhaled corticosteroids + long-acting beta 2 agonists)
the equivalent volume of venous blood was harvested from the subjects of asthma group and then extracted for the detection of the numbers of eosinophila microparticles. Results The circulating level of eosinophila microparticles was significantly higher in the asthma group before treatment than that in control group and the asthma group after treatment (F=5.532
P=0.038; Z=-4.937
P0.01)
and there was no statistical difference between the asthma group after treatment and the control group (F=3.118
P=0.102). The number of microparticles has no significant difference between the allergic asthma subgroup and the non-allergic asthma subgroup (t=0.421
P=0.677; t=0.006
P=0.952)
but statistical difference was seen in the number between the well-controlled asthma group and un-controlled group after treatment (t=-2.086
P=0.046)
and Δ eosinophila microparticles represented linear correlations with the changes of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
the percentage of FEV1 (FEV1%)
eosinophil count (ΔEos count)
faction exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and athma control test (ACT) (r=-0.558
P0.01; r=-0.453
P=0.005; r=0.625
P0.01; r=0.313
P=0.041; r=-0.399
P=0.012). Conclusion The number of circulating eosinophila microparticles is increased in asthma patients
and decreased after treatment. So
dynamical monitoring its level may contribute to the assessment of asthma control.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621