
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
叶丽敏,李岚,白班俊.T细胞斑点试验在肠结核及克罗恩病鉴别诊断中的临床价值[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2015,37(20):2091-2095.
Ye Limin,Li Lan,Bai Banjun.Clinical value of T-cell spot test for tuberculosis in differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(20):2091-2095.
叶丽敏,李岚,白班俊.T细胞斑点试验在肠结核及克罗恩病鉴别诊断中的临床价值[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2015,37(20):2091-2095. DOI:
Ye Limin,Li Lan,Bai Banjun.Clinical value of T-cell spot test for tuberculosis in differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(20):2091-2095. DOI:
目的 探讨结核杆菌T细胞斑点试验(T-SPOT.TB)在肠结核(intestinal tuberculosis,ITB)和克罗恩(Crohn’s disease,CD)病鉴别诊断中的价值。 方法 回顾性分析2012年3月至2014年12月贵州省人民医院消化内科就诊并确诊的64例肠结核和克罗恩病住院患者。35例ITB患者中19例男性,16例女性,年龄14~77(37.3±16.5)岁。29例CD患者中13例男性,16例女性,年龄15~74(35.2±18.9)岁。比较2组患者在临床表现、实验室检查结果、内镜及病理学检查结果上的差异,统计分析T-SPOT.TB在ITB和CD中的阳性率及诊断ITB的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,评价T-SPOT.TB鉴别诊断CD和ITB的临床价值。 结果 ITB患者腹泻(31.4% vs 65.5%,χ
2
=7.41,P0.01)、便血(8.6% vs 41.3%,χ
2
=9.51,P0.01)、肠梗阻(11.4% vs 34.5%,χ
2
=3.799,P0.05)和肠穿孔(0% vs 10.3%,χ
2
=3.799,P0.05)的发生率显著低于CD患者。T-SPOT.TB试验在ITB中的阳性率显著高于CD患者(91.4% vs 6.9%,χ
2
=45.508,P0.01),其敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为91.4%和94.1%,特异性和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为93.1%和90.0%。环行溃疡(20.0% vs 3.4%,χ
2
=3.972,P0.05)和回盲瓣受累(77.1% vs 51.7%,χ
2
=4.542,P0.05)在ITB中多见,而纵行溃疡(2.9% vs 20.6%,χ
2
=5.177,P0.05)、卵石征(0% vs 27.6%,χ
2
=11.034,P0.01)和肠腔狭窄(14.3% vs 37.9%,χ
2
=4.729,P0.05)在CD多见。淋巴细胞聚集在ITB中的发生率显著低于CD(31.4% vs 86.2%,χ
2
=19.338,P0.01),干酪样肉芽肿在ITB中的发生率显著高于CD(42.8% vs 0%,χ
2
=16.233,P0.01)。 结论 T-SPOT.TB对ITB的诊断具有较高的灵敏度及特异度,有助于鉴别CD和ITB。
Objective To study the differential diagnosis value of T-cell spot test of tuberculosis (T-SPOT.TB) between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease. Methods Sixty-four patients with intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) or Crohn’s disease (CD) in our department from Mar
2012 to Dec
2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The ITB patients were 37.3±16.5 years old (ranged from 14 to 77)
and 19 males and 16 females. The CD patients were 35.2±18.9 years old (ranged from 15 to 74)
were 13 males and 16 females. The sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
and negative predictive value of T-SPOT.TB in differential diagnosis between ITB and CD were evaluated by analyzing the clinical manifestations
laboratory examination results
endoscopic findings and pathological results. Results The incidences of diarrhea (31.4% vs 65.5%
Chi-square=7.41
P0.01)
hematochezia (8.6% vs 41.3%
Chi-square=9.51
P0.01)
obstruction (11.4% vs 34.5%
Chi-square=3.799
P0.05) and bowel perforation (0% vs 10.3%
Chi-square=3.799
P0.05) in the ITB patients were significantly lower than those in the CD patients. The positive rate of T-SPOT.TB test in the ITB patients was higher than that in the CD patients (91.4% vs 6.9%
Chi-square=45.508
P0.01)
with sensitivity and positive predictive value of 91.4% and 94.1%
respectively and specificity and negative predictive value of 93.1% and 90.0%
respectively. Circular ulcer (20.0% vs 3.4%
Chi-square=3.972
P0.05) and ileocecum involvement (77.1% vs 51.7%
Chi-square=4.542
P0.05) were significantly more common in the ITB patients
while higher incidences of longitudinal ulcer (2.9% vs 20.6%
Chi-square=5.177
P0.05)
pebble levy (0% vs 27.6%
Chi-square=11.034
P0.01) and luminal stenosis (14.3% vs 37.9%
Chi-square=4.729
P0.05) were found in the CD patients as compared with the ITB patients. Lymph cell aggregation incidence of ITB was significantly lower than that of CD (31.4% vs 86.2%
Chi-square=19.338
P0.01)
and granuloma formation was significantly more common in ITB as compared with CD (42.8% vs 0%
Chi-square=16.233
P0.01). Conclusion T-SPOT.TB blood test is useful for differential diagnosis between ITB and CD with high sensitivity and specificity.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621