
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
朱晨,秦再生,陶涛.超声引导下间隔平面胸椎旁阻滞联合TIVA应用于乳腺癌改良根治术对术后疼痛的影响[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2015,37(18):1875-1880.
Zhu Chen,Qin Zaisheng,Tao Tao.Efficiency of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blocking combined with total intravenous anesthesia for modified radical mastectomy on postoperative pain: report of 60 cases[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(18):1875-1880.
朱晨,秦再生,陶涛.超声引导下间隔平面胸椎旁阻滞联合TIVA应用于乳腺癌改良根治术对术后疼痛的影响[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2015,37(18):1875-1880. DOI:
Zhu Chen,Qin Zaisheng,Tao Tao.Efficiency of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blocking combined with total intravenous anesthesia for modified radical mastectomy on postoperative pain: report of 60 cases[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(18):1875-1880. DOI:
目的 评估超声引导下间隔平面胸椎旁阻滞联合全凭静脉麻醉(total intravenous anesthesia
TIVA)用于乳腺癌改良根治术对术后疼痛的影响。 方法 60例行乳腺癌根治术18~85岁女性患者,ASA Ⅰ~Ⅲ 级,按随机数字表法分为2组,每组30例。静吸复合组行静吸复合全身麻醉,胸椎旁阻滞组行多平面胸椎旁阻滞联合TIVA,术中自主呼吸。2组术后镇痛均采用患者自控静脉镇痛(patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
PCIA)。在T1(入室时)、T2(手术开始前即刻)、T3(切皮后5 min)、T4(腋窝清扫时)、T5(手术结束时)、T6(拔除喉罩时)、T7(转出PACU时)记录患者的心率、血压、脉搏氧饱和度(SpO
2
)、呼气末二氧化碳(P
ET
CO
2
)和脑电双频谱指数(bispectral index,BIS);在T8(术后2 h)、T9(术后4 h)、T10(术后8 h)、T11(术后16 h)、T12(术后24 h)对患者进行VAS疼痛评分。记录术中舒芬太尼用量,PACU停留时间,PCIA舒芬太尼用量和PCIA按压次数及术后麻醉相关并发症情况。 结果 在手术开始前即刻,胸椎旁阻滞组心率明显高于静吸复合组,在手术结束时,胸椎旁阻滞组心率明显低于静吸复合组(P0.05)。血压、SpO
2
、P
ET
CO
2
和BIS在各时间点差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。胸椎旁阻滞组在术后2、4 h和术后8 h平静休息和咳嗽时VAS评分均低于静吸复合组。胸椎旁阻滞组的术中舒芬太尼用量、PACU停留时间、PCIA舒芬太尼用量和按压次数均低于静吸复合组(P0.05)。胸椎旁阻滞组术后麻醉相关并发症发生例数少于静吸复合组,但2组发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞可安全有效的应用于乳腺癌改良根治术,不仅可以有效减少围术期阿片类药物的用量,降低PACU停留时间,而且能改善术后急性疼痛,有利于患者术后恢复。
Objective To determine the effect of ultrasound-g
uided thoracic paravertebral blocking combined with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the postoperative pain in patients after modified radical mastectomy. Methods Sixty female patients (18 to 85 years old) with America Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score of Ⅰ~Ⅲ undergoing modified radical mastectomy in our hospital from March to December 2014 were prospectively recruited in this study. They were equally randomized into intravenous-inhalation general anesthesia group and thoracic paravertebral block plus TIVA group. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was applied in the both groups. The heart rate (HR)
blood pressure
oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO
2
)
end-tidal carbon dioxide (P
ET
CO
2
) and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded before medication (T
1
)
immediately before surgery (T
2
)
5 min after skin incision (T
3
)
at axillary dissection (T
4
)
end of mastectomy (T
5
)
remove of laryngeal mask (T
6
)
and out of post anesthesia care unit (PACU
T
7
). Visual analogue pain (VAS) scoring was used to evaluate the pain score in 2
4
8
16 and 24 h after operation. The consumption of sufentanil during operation
PACU stay time
PCIA sufentanil consumption
frequency of PCIA and incidences of complications related to anesthesia and analgesia were also recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Results Only at the beginning and ending of surgery
HR was significantly higher in the thoracic paravertebral block group than intravenous-inhalation general anesthesia group
but at the end of operation
HR was obviously lower in the former than the latter group (P0.05). There were no significant differences in BP
SpO
2
P
ET
CO
2
and BIS between the 2 groups during operation (P0.05). The former group had significantly lower VAS pain scores at resting and during coughing when compared with those of the latter group at 2
4 and 8 h after operation (P0.05)
. The former group also had smaller consumptions of sufentanil during operation and PCIA
shorter PACU stay time
lower frequency of PCIA pressing than the latter group (P0.05). The incidences of complications were less in the former than the latter groups
but no significant difference was seen in the incidence (P0.05). Conclusion The thoracic paravertebral block combined TIVA is safe and effective in modified radical mastectomy with less opioid consumption
shorter PACU stay time and more satisfactory results in postoperative pain control.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621