
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2012
移动端阅览
马中锐,蒙华庆,胡华,邹志礼,王慧,杜莲,张洪银.反社会行为始于青少年期和儿童期的暴力犯罪青少年童年受虐史、攻击行为的差异比较[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2012,34(24):2511-2514.
Ma Zhongrui,Meng Huaqing,Hu Hua,Zou Zhili,Wang Hui,Du Lian,Zhang Hongyin.Childhood abuse and aggressive behavior in violent adolescent criminals with adolescence- vs children-onset antisocial behavior[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2012,34(24):2511-2514.
马中锐,蒙华庆,胡华,邹志礼,王慧,杜莲,张洪银.反社会行为始于青少年期和儿童期的暴力犯罪青少年童年受虐史、攻击行为的差异比较[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2012,34(24):2511-2514. DOI:
Ma Zhongrui,Meng Huaqing,Hu Hua,Zou Zhili,Wang Hui,Du Lian,Zhang Hongyin.Childhood abuse and aggressive behavior in violent adolescent criminals with adolescence- vs children-onset antisocial behavior[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2012,34(24):2511-2514. DOI:
目的 比较反社会行为始于青少年期(adolescence-onset
AO)和始于儿童期(children-onset
CO)的暴力犯罪青少年童年受虐史、攻击行为差异;探索AO与CO攻击行为与受虐的关系。 方法 选取14~18岁男性暴力犯罪青少年AO、CO各110例,选取14~18岁110例普通男性学生作为对照,采用一般情况问卷、儿童虐待问卷、忽视问卷、攻击问卷进行横断面调查研究。 结果 父母不良嗜好、社会风气、父母婚姻及关系、父母教育程度等家庭社会环境因素3组差异有统计学意义(P0.01);儿童期受虐、被忽视各因子及总分3组差异有统计学意义(F=86.524、F=70.754,P0.01),且AO组交流及躯体忽视得分高于CO组和对照组(P0.05),AO组和CO组性虐待、虐待总分高于对照组(P0.05);攻击各因子及总分:CO组AO组对照组,差异有统计学意义(F=24.887,P0.01);AO组、CO组攻击行为与童年虐待均呈显著正相关(r
AO
=0.44、r
CO
=0.78,P0.01)。 结论 AO较CO暴力犯罪青少年童年期家庭社会环境更差,童年受虐、被忽视程度更严重,但CO暴力犯罪青少年攻击行为更强,提示未来对青少年暴力犯罪的干预需根据其类型特征采取不同措施。
Objective To investigate the differences of childhood abuse
neglect and aggressive behavior between violent adolescent criminals with adolescence-(AO) and children-onset (CO) antisocial behavior
and to explore the relationship of aggressive behavior between AO and CO with being abused. Methods One hundred and ten AO and 110 CO violent adolescent criminals (all males
with an age ranging from 14 to 18) were selected from Chongqing juvenile p
rison. Another 110 male students at the same age range from an occupation high school served as control. All of them were assessed with the self-made general situation questionnaire
childhood trauma questionnaire-28-item short-form (CTQ-SF)
aggression questionnaire (AQ) and child neglected scale to cross-sectional survey research. Results There were significant differences in the bad habits of parents
dwelling environment
customs
parental rearing styles
and marital status among the 3 groups(P0.01). Very statistical differences were found in the childhood abuse
neglect and total score among the 3 groups(F=86.524
F=70.754
P0.01). The communication and body ignore was higher in the AO group than CO and control groups (P0.05)
yet the sexual abuse and abuse total score were higher in the AO and CO groups than control (P0.05). There were significant differences in the aggressive behaviors among the 3 groups (F=24.887
P0.01)
in an order of CO groupAO groupcontrol. There was positive correlation between aggressive behaviors and childhood abuse both in the AO and CO groups (r
AO
=0.44
r
CO
=0.78
P0.01). Conclusion AO group has worse childhood family
social environment
abuse and neglect compared with CO group
but CO group has stronger aggressive behavior. Our results indicate that different measurement should be taken according to the characteristics of different groups of violent criminals in future intervention.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621