
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2010
移动端阅览
温兆赢,张兆琪,于薇,范占明,杜靖,吕飙.多排CT对左心房和左心耳容积和功能的评价[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2010,32(12):1336-1339.
Wen Zhaoying,Zhang Zhaoqi,Yu Wei,Fan Zhanming,Du Jing,Lu Biao.Multi-detector CT versus cine magnetic resonance for assessing volume and function of left atrial and left atrial appendage: report of 48 cases[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2010,32(12):1336-1339.
温兆赢,张兆琪,于薇,范占明,杜靖,吕飙.多排CT对左心房和左心耳容积和功能的评价[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2010,32(12):1336-1339. DOI:
Wen Zhaoying,Zhang Zhaoqi,Yu Wei,Fan Zhanming,Du Jing,Lu Biao.Multi-detector CT versus cine magnetic resonance for assessing volume and function of left atrial and left atrial appendage: report of 48 cases[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2010,32(12):1336-1339. DOI:
目的 与3.0T CMR(cine magnetic resonance)比较,探讨多排CT(multi-detector CT
MDCT)评估左心房和左心耳容积和功能的能力。 方法 回顾性分析2008年3-12月进行冠状动脉CTA检查的48例患者,同一天完成多排CT和CMR检查,并获得多排CT容积数据及左心房垂直长轴FIESTA 电影图像。多排CT采用心功能分析软件、MR采用Report Card 2.0心功能分析软件对原始数据进行后处理,分析左心房和左心耳最大容积、最小容积、射血分数。通过线性相关和t检验分析评估多排CT和CMR 2种检查方法间的相关性和一致性,操作者间的变异性采用Bland-Altman分析。 结果 多排CT与CMR测得的左心房和左心耳的容积和功能指标具有较好的相关性(r>0.75)和一致性。与CMR相比,多排CT有过高估计LAV
max
、LAV
min
、LAAV
max
和LAAV
min
的趋势,对左心房射血分数(left atrial ejection fraction
LAEF)和左房耳射血分数(left atrial appendage ejection fraction
LAAEF)有低估的趋势。多排CT操作者间测量值的变异性低于CMR操作者间的变异性。 结论 多排CT对于进行多排CT冠状动脉造影检查的患者,在提供冠状动脉信息的同时,对左心房和左心耳的容积和功能评估较准确、重复性较强。
Objective To assess the performance of multi-detector CT (MDCT) to evaluate left atrial and left atrial appendage volume and function
and compare the results by cardiac cine MR (CMR). Methods Forty-eight patients who were referred for clinically-indicated CT coronary angiography in our department from March to December 2008
were included in the study.
MDCT data sets (Somatom Definition
Siemens Medical Solutions
Forchheim
Germany) and fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition ( FIESTA ) cines (Signa Excite HD 3T
GE ) of the vertical long axis covering the left atrium were obtained on the same day. All images were analyzed to obtain the maximum and minimum of left atrial volume (LAV
max
and LAV
min
)
the maximum and minimum of left atrial appendage volume (LAAV
max
and LAAV
min
)
left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF)
and left atrial appendage ejection fraction (LAAEF) using Heart Function software and Report Card 2.0 software
respectively
for MDCT and CMR. Intermodality agreement was tested through linear regression and t test. Interobserver variability were tested by Bland-Altman analyses. Results MDCT measurements resulted in good correlation (r0.75) compared with CMR. However
MDCT has a tendency to overestimate LAV
max
LAV
min
LAAV
max
and LAAV
min
and to underestimate LAEF and LAAEF but insignificantly. The interobserver variability in the MDCT measurements was lower than that of CMR values. Conclusion MDCT provides highly reliable and reproducible measurements of left atrial and left atrial appendage volume and function in patients referred for coronary CT imaging.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621