
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版:2007
移动端阅览
周泽云,张巧.头孢吡肟治疗社区获得性重症肺炎44例临床观察[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2007,29(20):2008-2010.
ZHOU Ze-yun,ZHANG Qiao.Cefepime for serious community acquired lower respiratory infection: 44 cases report[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2007,29(20):2008-2010.
目的 观察头孢吡肟治疗社区获得性重症肺炎的临床疗效及安全性评价。 方法 将86例确诊社区获得性重症肺炎患者随机分为两组,在常规治疗基础上,治疗组44例,采用头孢吡肟(2 g静滴 1次/12 h);对照组42例,采用头孢噻肟(3 g 静滴 1次/8 h),两组疗程均为7~14 d。 结果 头孢吡肟对G
+
球菌及G
-
杆菌感染均有良好的疗效,对部分耐第一、二、三代头孢菌素药物的菌株亦能起到较好的抗菌作用,头孢吡肟组治愈率86.4%
有效率93.2%,头孢噻肟组对部分耐药G
+
球菌及G
-
杆菌感染治疗效果差,治愈率64.3%,有效率76.2%,两组比较有显著性差异(P0.01)。 结论 头孢吡肟体外抗菌活性强于头孢噻肟,是一种安全、广谱、有效的经验性治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的抗生素。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime in the treatment of serious community acquired lower respiratory infection. Methods Eighty-six patients of serious community acquired lower respiratory infection were randomized into the experimental group (n=44) receiving cefepime (2 g
intravenous infusion
twice a day) for 7-14 d and the control group (n=42) receiving cefotaxime (3 g
intravenous infusion
three times a day) for 7-14 d. Results There were no statistical differences of age
severity of the disease
original diseases
or distribution of pathogens between the two groups. In the experimental group
cefepime had a good therapeutic efficacy against not only the gram-negative bacteria infection and the gram-positive bacteria infection
but also other cephalosporin-resistant bacteria infection. Its cure rate was 86.4%
and effective rate 93.2%. In the control group
cefotaxime had a less therapeutic efficacy against the infection caused by some resistant strains of the gram-negative bacteria and the gram-positive bacteria. Its cure rate was 64.3%
and effective rate 76.2%. Conclusion The antibacterial activity of cefepime is stronger than that of cefotaxime. So cefepime is an effective and safe antibiotic
and suggested to use in the empirical treatment for serious community acquired lower respiratory infection.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621