LI Zhi-ping,FAN Shi-zhi,JIANG Yao-guang,WANG Ru-wen,CHEN Jian-ming,NIU Hui-jun,HE Yong,GUO Wei,SHEN Cheng.Resistance to prostaglandin E1 in postoperative early stage of valvular replacement in rheumatic heart disease patients[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2007,29(09):792-795.
LI Zhi-ping,FAN Shi-zhi,JIANG Yao-guang,WANG Ru-wen,CHEN Jian-ming,NIU Hui-jun,HE Yong,GUO Wei,SHEN Cheng.Resistance to prostaglandin E1 in postoperative early stage of valvular replacement in rheumatic heart disease patients[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2007,29(09):792-795.DOI:
,其中7例(B1)术后24 h按A组方法给药1次,其余7例(B2)采用生理盐水作为对照。术后24 h实验组14例(C组=A1+B1),对照组14例(D组=A2+B2)。 结果 术中A组和B组平均肺动脉压(MPAP)下降比较相差不显著(P0.05),心脏指数(CI)、体循环阻力(SVR)、肺循环阻力(PVR)、肺动脉楔压(PAWP)变化均无显著性差异(P0.05);术后24 h C、D组平均肺动脉压(MPAP)下降相差显著(P0.05),两组心脏指数(CI)变化相差非常显著(P0.01)。 结论 风心病合并肺动脉高压患者在瓣膜置换术后,麻醉状况下对前列腺素E
1
存在抵抗现象,而在清醒状况下前列腺素E
1
能扩张肺血管,降低肺动脉压,提高心脏指数,改善心功能。
Abstract
Objective To study the rule of surgical treatment for rheumatic heart disease in the postoperative stage of valve replacement. Methods Twenty-eight cases
suffered from rheumatic heart disease
were randomly divided into two groups
group A and B. In group A
14 cases were given 20-100 ng·kg
-1
·min
-1
of prostaglandin E
1
(PGE
1
) after the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was stopped
and its velocity (dosage) was increased by 20 ng·kg
-1
·min
-1
every 10 minutes. When up to 100 ng·kg
-1
·min
-1
the velocity was held on for 10 minutes
then seized. PGE
1
was swapped when it was used for 1 h. Twenty-four hours later
7 cases of group A (A1) were given PGE
1
once more as the same as the day before; the other 7 cases (A2) were given normal saline instead as for controls. In group B
no cases were given PGE
1
during operation or on the day of operation. Twenty-four hours later
7 cases (B1) were given PGE
1
as that of A1
and the other 7 cases (B2) as that in group A2. In the hour of PGE
1
injection
the blood pressure (SABP
DABP
MABP)
pulmonary pressure (SPAP
DPAP
MPAP
PAWP)
systemic vascular resistance (SVR)
and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were measured via Swan-Ganz catheter. Results There was not significant difference of parameters mentioned above between group A and group B. Twenty-four hours after operation
MPAP
PAWP and PVR in group C (A1+B1) were much lower than those in group D (A2+B2). Conclusion The effect of PGE
1
on pressure of pulmonary artery could not be seen when the patients were in anesthesia
so during mitral replacement operation it might be of some resistance.