JI Peng,NING Lijuan,CHEN Yongwu,et al.Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(22):2762-2765.
JI Peng,NING Lijuan,CHEN Yongwu,et al.Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(22):2762-2765. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.22.15.
Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
To observe the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
2
Clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were selected. According to their chemotherapy regimen,they were divided into albumin-bound paclitaxel group and paclitaxel group, with 100 patients in each group. Both groups received chemotherapy regimen containing Paclitaxel for injection (albumin-bound) or Paclitaxel injection for at least 2 cycles (every 21 days as a cycle). The progression-free survival (PFS) and efficacy of the two groups were compared,and the occurrence of toxic and side effects were recorded.
RESULTS
2
The patients in albumin-bound paclitaxel group completed 430 cycles of chemotherapy, with an average of 4.3 cycles; patients in paclitaxel group completed 476 cycles of chemotherapy, with an average of 4.8 cycles. The median PFS (4.0 months) and the response rate (13.00%) of albumin-bound paclitaxel group were not significantly different from those of paclitaxel group (4.0 months,9.00%) (
P
>0.05). The disease control rate (99.00%) was significantly higher than that in paclitaxel group (89.00%), and the incidences of leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia,anemia, sensory neuropathy, fatigue,nausea and vomiting,joint myalgia in albumin-bound paclitaxel group were significantly lower than those in paclitaxel group (
P
<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
2
Albumin-bound paclitaxel is effective in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, and it can better control the progression of the disease and is safer than ordinary paclitaxel.
EISENHAUER E A , THERASSE P , BOGAERTS J , et al . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised RECIST guideline,version 1.1 [J ] . Eur J Cancer , 2009 , 45 ( 2 ): 228 - 247 .
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute . Common terminology criteria for adverse events(CTCAE),version 5.0 [EB/OL ] .( 2017-11-27 )[ 2022-04-11 ] . https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf .