Current status of clinical decision-making and needs for intelligent teaching technologies in perioperative crisis simulation training of anesthesia nurses and anesthesiologists
Digital Intelligence Nursing Education Column|更新时间:2026-05-02
|
Current status of clinical decision-making and needs for intelligent teaching technologies in perioperative crisis simulation training of anesthesia nurses and anesthesiologists
Chinese Journal of Medical Education ResearchVol. 25, Issue 4, Pages: 410-416(2026)
作者机构:
1.中山大学附属第一医院麻醉科,广州 510080
2.中山大学附属第一医院手术麻醉中心,广州 510080
3.中山大学附属第一医院心血管医学部心内一科,广州 510080
4.中山大学附属第一医院医学教师发展中心,广州 510080
作者简介:
Liu Jiaxin, Email: liujiax@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金信息:
2022 Guangdong Province Continuing Education Quality Enhancement Project(JXJYGC2022GX265);Sun Yat-sen University Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project ( [2026] No. 36-369 Items)
Tan Jiayu, Guo Junying, Feng Xia, et al. Current status of clinical decision-making and needs for intelligent teaching technologies in perioperative crisis simulation training of anesthesia nurses and anesthesiologists[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 25(4): 410-416.
Tan Jiayu, Guo Junying, Feng Xia, et al. Current status of clinical decision-making and needs for intelligent teaching technologies in perioperative crisis simulation training of anesthesia nurses and anesthesiologists[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 25(4): 410-416. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20260109-02249.
Current status of clinical decision-making and needs for intelligent teaching technologies in perioperative crisis simulation training of anesthesia nurses and anesthesiologists
To investigate differences in clinical decision-making between anesthesia/operating room nurses and anesthesiologists during perioperative crisis simulation training
analyze their preferences for intelligent teaching technologies and associated influencing factors
and provide a basis for optimizing the application of intelligent teaching technologies.
Methods
2
Using a convenience sampling method
a questionnaire survey was conducted from October 2022 to August 2025 among 432 nurses and anesthesiologists who participated in perioperative crisis simulation training at our center. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0.
Results
2
A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected
yielding a response rate of 92.59%. Among the respondents
220 (55.00%) reported a preference for intelligent teaching technologies. Nurses relied more on instructions from senior physicians in clinical decision-making (
χ
2
=8.53
P
=0.004) and experienced greater pressure related to time constraints (
χ
2
=7.18
P
=0.007) and ineffective team collaboration (
χ
2
=12.73
P
<
0.001) compared to anesthesiologists. Nurses also placed greater emphasis on case realism (
χ
2
=8.01
P
=0.005) and error tolerance (
χ
2
=10.29
P
<
0.001). Anesthesiologists were more inclined to base decisions on experience with similar previous cases (
χ
2
=5.70
P
=0.017) and attached greater importance to timeliness of instructor feedback (
χ
2
=23.77
P
=0.001) and compatibility between simulation equipment and real clinical devices (
χ
2
=21.71
P
<
0.001). Significant differences in teaching technology preferences between nurses and anesthesiologists were observed regarding team members' suggestions (
χ
2
=5.75
P
=0.017)
case realism (
χ
2
=5.06
P
=0.025)
and team role allocation and collaboration (
χ
2
=6.60
P
=0.010). Multivariable analysis of nurse preference for intelligent teaching technologies showed a lower preference among charge nurses (odds ratio=0.49
95%
CI
=0.25-0.94
P
=0.030).
Conclusions
2
Differences exist between nurses and anesthesiologists in perioperative crisis decision-making and preferences for teaching technologies
with professional title identified as a key factor influencing nurse preference for intelligent teaching technologies. Integrating intelligent teaching technologies into simulation training may facilitate the development of personalized teaching strategies.
关键词
Keywords
references
Burnett GW , Goldhaber-Fiebert SN . The role of simulation training in patients' safety in anaesthesia and perioperative medicine [J ] . BJA Educ , 2024 , 24 ( 1 ): 7 - 12 . DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2023.10.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2023.10.002 .
Elendu C , Amaechi DC , Okatta AU , et al . The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: a review [J ] . Medicine , 2024 , 103 ( 27 ): e38813 . DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813 .
Fleet A , Kaustov L , Belfiore EB , et al . Current clinical and educational uses of immersive reality in anesthesia: narrative review [J ] . J Med Internet Res , 2025 , 27 : e62785 . DOI: 10.2196/62785 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/62785 .
Bouchez T , Cagnon C , Hamouche G , et al . Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: a scoping review [J ] . J Adv Nurs , 2024 , 80 ( 3 ): 884 - 907 . DOI: 10.1111/jan.15865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15865 .
Fazlollahi AM , Bakhaidar M , Alsayegh A , et al . Effect of artificial intelligence tutoring vs expert instruction on learning simulated surgical skills among medical students: a randomized clinical trial [J ] . JAMA Netw Open , 2022 , 5 ( 2 ): e2149008 . DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.49008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.49008 .
Wang W , Gao L , Lin Y , et al . Virtual reality is emerging training applications for anesthesia simulation [J ] . Eur J Med Res , 2025 , 30 ( 1 ): 768 . DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-03054-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03054-9 .
Ali S , Devabalan Y , Gao C , et al . Multidisciplinary high-fidelity simulation training for the management of laryngospasm following general and local anesthetic procedures [J ] . Cureus , 2025 , 17 ( 10 ): e95041 . DOI: 10.7759/cureus.95041 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.95041 .
Huai P , Li Y , Wang X , et al . The effectiveness of virtual reality technology in student nurse education: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Nurse Educ Today , 2024 , 138 : 106189 . DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106189 .