A study on the evaluation of teaching case discussion results based on teaching supervision and the identification of obstacle factors
|更新时间:2026-07-31
|
A study on the evaluation of teaching case discussion results based on teaching supervision and the identification of obstacle factors
Chinese Journal of Medical Education ResearchPages: 1-6(2026)
作者机构:
中山大学附属第七医院教育处,深圳 518107
作者简介:
Tang Lina, Email: tanglina@sysush.com
基金信息:
The Ministry of Education's Industry-Academia Cooperation and Collaborative Education Project(220702943211253);Shenzhen Education Science 14th Five-Year Plan Project(cgpy23019)
Liang Zhenning, Xu Yaoyao, Huang Xiaosi, et al. A study on the evaluation of teaching case discussion results based on teaching supervision and the identification of obstacle factors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 1-6.
DOI:
Liang Zhenning, Xu Yaoyao, Huang Xiaosi, et al. A study on the evaluation of teaching case discussion results based on teaching supervision and the identification of obstacle factors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2026, 1-6.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20250723-02327.
A study on the evaluation of teaching case discussion results based on teaching supervision and the identification of obstacle factors
To evaluate the results of teaching case discussion based on teaching supervision and analyze the main obstacle factors
and to provide a basis for further improving teaching quality.
Methods
2
From January 2022 to December 2024
the clinical teaching activities of the hospital were supervised
and the supervision results of teaching case discussion were collected. The entropy weight-TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the supervision results of teaching case discussion
and the obstacle degree model was used to analyze the main obstacle factors of the supervision results.
Results
2
The average score of teaching case discussion supervision was (92.35±4.63). The entropy-weighted TOPSIS analysis showed that indicator A2 had the highest weight
and the average comprehensive evaluation score of teaching case discussion supervision was 0.773. The obstacle degree model analysis indicated that all 18 indicators posed obstacles to the supervision outcome
with the main obstacle factors including B3
B7
B8
and C5 (tied)
as well as B4 and C2 (tied).
Conclusions
2
The overall evaluation results of teaching case discussion are good
but there is still room for improvement. It is recommended to construct a representative case demonstration model to refine the success factors and form a replicable model
improve barrier factors to enhance the clinical thinking and problem-solving skills of students
and pay attention to the combination of practice and theory to cultivate high-quality talents in the future.
Exploration of combined teaching evaluation based on characteristic analysis of raw scores and standard scores
A practical study on the informatization construction of teaching supervision for standardized residency training
Teaching reform and practice of the course Comprehensive Experiment of Basic Medicine based on systematic integration
Reform and practice of an integrated teaching model for the course Biochemistry and Molecular Biology based on cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic concept and problem-based learning
Latent class analysis of continuing medical education needs among medical staff in non-provincial capital municipal tertiary hospitals of Guangdong, China
Related Author
Deng Yuxuan
Yu Jingfei
Chen Lu
Mu Panwei
Liu Ying
Li Shangrong
Yao Yao
Zhu Yaqin
Related Institution
Department of Education, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Department of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Post-graduation Education Office, Shanghai East Hospital