Construction of a competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals
Educational Evaluation|更新时间:2025-02-21
|
Construction of a competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals
Chinese Journal of Medical Education ResearchVol. 24, Issue 2, Pages: 192-197(2025)
作者机构:
1.江门市中心医院科教科,江门 529030
2.广州医科大学附属第三医院学生科,广州 510150
3.广东省第二人民医院医保科,广州 510317
4.杭州电子科技大学计算机学院,杭州 310018
5.江门市中心医院医疗保险管理科,江门 529030
作者简介:
Yu Chuhong, Email: 380432228@qq.com
基金信息:
Medical and Health Field Science and Technology Plan Project of Jiangmen City(2022YL01086);Teaching Reform Research Project of Jiangmen Central Hospital(JG202402)
Zhang Yuan, Zou Zhihui, Zhang Manjie, et al. Construction of a competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals[J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2025, 24(2): 192-197.
Zhang Yuan, Zou Zhihui, Zhang Manjie, et al. Construction of a competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals[J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2025, 24(2): 192-197. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20240316-01909.
Construction of a competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals
To construct a scientific and reliable clinical teacher competency evaluation index system
and provide a reference for strengthening the construction of clinical teachers in teaching hospitals.
Methods
2
Based on literature research and group discussion
the initial expert consultation questionnaire was constructed. Two rounds of expert consultation were conducted using the Delphi method to form the competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals. A hierarchy analysis was conducted using Python to calculate the weights of indicators.
Results
2
The positive coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultation were 100.00% and 95.24%
respectively
and the expert authority coefficients were 0.843 and 0.862
respectively. The Kendall's coefficients of concordance for the first-
second-
and third-level indicators in the first round of expert consultation were 0.207
0.152
and 0.191 (
P
<
0.001)
respectively
and these coefficients in the second round of expert consultation were 0.271
0.176
and 0.252 (
P
<
0.001)
respectively. The final evaluation index system included 7 first-level indicators
15 second-level indicators
and 43 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators included professional quality
professional knowledge and skills
medical education knowledge
teaching ability
communication and cooperation
teaching motivation
and career development
and their weights were 0.147
0.149
0.142
0.147
0.146
0.134
and 0.136
respectively.
Conclusions
2
The evaluation index system is comprehensive
scientific
and reliable. It can provide a reference for clinical teacher selection