Blended team-based learning in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice
Teaching Reform|更新时间:2025-02-18
|
Blended team-based learning in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice
Chinese Journal of Medical Education ResearchVol. 24, Issue 1, Pages: 98-103(2025)
作者机构:
1.同济大学医学院全科医学系,上海 200092
2.同济大学附属杨浦医院全科医学科,上海 200090
3.上海市全科医学与社区卫生发展研究中心,上海 200090
作者简介:
Lu Yuan, Email: yuanlu@tongji.edu.cn
基金信息:
2020 Medical Education Research Project of Medical Education Branch of Chinese Medical Association and Medical Education Professional Committee of Chinese Association of Higher Education(2020B-N08139);Shanghai Medical and Health Development Foundation Project(SE1201933);National Medical Graduate Education Committee Online Course Construction Project(B-YXC2022-01-01-10)
Zhai Jiayi, Lu Yuan, Ma Linlin, et al. Blended team-based learning in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice[J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2025, 24(1): 98-103.
Zhai Jiayi, Lu Yuan, Ma Linlin, et al. Blended team-based learning in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice[J]. Chinese journal of medical education research, 2025, 24(1): 98-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230508-01877.
Blended team-based learning in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice
To investigate the application of blended team-based learning (BTBL) in improving the clinical reasoning ability of general practitioners from different sources.
Methods
2
From September to December in 2021
52 postgraduates of general practice in Tongji University School of Medicine were selected as subjects
and according to their study background and practice experience
they were divided into residency training group
community group
and specialist group. BTBL was adopted for all students in the course of clinical reasoning in general practice
and a 4-station objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test was conducted before and after the course to evaluate teaching effectiveness from the aspects of medical history collection
physical examination
doctor-patient communication
and medical record writing. SPSS 22.0 was used to perform a statistical analysis of data. Continuous data were expressed as mean±standard deviation
and an analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between groups; the paired samples
t
-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for comparison of normally distributed or non-normally distributed data within each group. Categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentage.
Results
2
There was a significant change in the score of physical examination after the course in the community group (44.88±9.17 vs. 78.06±12.11
t
=-12.49
P
<
0.001)
the specialist group (45.85±8.18 vs. 68.65±13.10
t
=-6.43
P
<
0.001)
and the residency training group (42.38±15.30 vs. 76.44±16.46
t
=-5.98
P
<
0.001). There was a significant change in the score of doctor-patient communication after the course in the community group (63.00±13.84 vs. 78.69±7.10
t/Z
=-4.33
P
<
0.05) and the residency training group (60.00±15.50 vs. 70.88±6.44
t/Z
=-2.12
P
<
0.05). There was a
lso a significant change in the score of medical record writing after the course in the community group (60.19±17.96 vs. 79.69±14.25
t
=-2.96
P
<
0.05)
the specialist group (47.77±12.59 vs. 80.31±12.93
t
=-6.26
P
<
0.05)
and the residency training group (37.00±15.50 vs. 75.88±15.88
t
=-7.25
P
<
0.05). The score of medical record writing before the course was 60.19±17.96 in the community group
47.77±12.59 in the specialist group
and 37.00±15.50 in the residency training group
with a significant difference between the three groups (
χ
2
=13.04
P
=0.001); after the course
the score of medical record writing was 78.69±7.10 in the community group
63.46±19.40 in the specialist group
and 70.88±6.44 in the residency training group
with a significant difference between the three groups (
χ
2
=10.13
P
=0.006).
Conclusions
2
In the course of clinical reasoning in general practice
BTBL can improve teaching efficiency
save teaching resources
and play the role of promoting strengths and avoiding weaknesses.