1.安徽中医药大学护理学院,安徽合肥
2.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院南区肾内科,安徽合肥
3.蚌埠医科大学护理学院,安徽合肥
4.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院护理部,安徽合肥
Chen Xia,E-mail: 1569265542@qq.com
Received:04 July 2026,
Revised:2026-08-19,
Accepted:20 August 2026,
Published:15 October 2026
移动端阅览
孙悦杰,杨贝贝,徐山姗,等.工作能力与能力预期是中青年慢性肾脏病患者重返工作准备状态的区分因素:一项潜在剖面分析的横断面研究[J].陆军军医大学学报,2026,48(19):2819-2828.DOI:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202607017.
Sun Y J,Yang B B,Xu S S,et al.Work ability and work ability expectations are distinguishing factors of return-to-work readiness in young and middle-aged patients with chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study using latent profile analysis[J].J Army Med Univ,2026,48(19):2819-2828.DOI:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202607017.
孙悦杰,杨贝贝,徐山姗,等.工作能力与能力预期是中青年慢性肾脏病患者重返工作准备状态的区分因素:一项潜在剖面分析的横断面研究[J].陆军军医大学学报,2026,48(19):2819-2828.DOI:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202607017. DOI:
Sun Y J,Yang B B,Xu S S,et al.Work ability and work ability expectations are distinguishing factors of return-to-work readiness in young and middle-aged patients with chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study using latent profile analysis[J].J Army Med Univ,2026,48(19):2819-2828.DOI:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202607017. DOI:
目的
2
患病后的治疗负担、功能受限及疾病的因素不确定性等严重影响中青年慢性肾脏病(chronic kidney disease,CKD)患者的收入来源、职业功能和社会参与,单纯以“未重返工作”描述,难以反映CKD患者在重返工作意愿、行动准备和支持需求方面的差异。本研究旨在识别未重返工作的中青年CKD患者的潜在重返工作准备状态,比较不同状态的疾病、工作能力及心理社会特征,并分析类别归属的相关因素,为开展分层、个体化的重返工作支持提供依据。
方法
2
采用横断面研究设计方案,于2026年1—6月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院南区肾内科门诊及病房开展的CKD患者调查,筛选出未重返工作者260例纳入分析。其中男性128例、女性132例,年龄43.00(33.00,51.25)岁。以重返工作准备度量表(readiness for return-to-work scale,RRTW)未重返工作分支条目1~13为外显指标,比较1~7类潜在剖面模型;采用Kruskal-Wallis
H
检验和Monte Carlo模拟
χ
²检验比较不同潜在类别的特征,以高行动准备型为参照进行基于赤池信息量准则(akaike information criterion,AIC)的后退逐步多分类Logistic回归,并采用1 000次Bootstrap评价变量选择及效应方向的稳定性。
结果
2
综合模型拟合、分类质量、类别规模和临床可解释性,最终选择5类模型[贝叶斯信息准则(bayesian information criterion,BIC)=7 835.4,Entropy=0.949,最小类别比例=11.5%,最小平均后验概率=0.954],共识别高行动准备型61例(23.5%)、中等准备型72例(27.7%)、低意向型30例(11.5%)、高支持需求-行动不足型66例(25.4%)和高障碍感知-求助型31例(11.9%)。以高行动准备型为参照,当前工作能力每增加1分,归入上述4类而非高行动准备型的
OR
分别为0.521(95%
CI
:0.334~0.812)、0.179(95%
CI
:0.098~0.325)、0.401(95%
CI
:0.255~0.630)、0.243(95%
CI
:0.139~0.423),
P
均
<
0.01。自评健康一般/差与高支持需求-行动不足型相关(
OR
=3.076,95%
CI
:1.187~7.971,
P
=0.021)。Bootstrap中当前工作能力和未来2年工作能力预期的入模频率分别为100.0%和99.7%,效应方向一致率为99.7%~100.0%。
结论
2
未重返工作的中青年CKD患者可被识别为5种不同的重返工作准备状态,当前工作能力和未来2年工作能力预期是区分不同准备状态最稳定的相关特征。临床护理不宜将“尽快重返工作”作为统一目标,应在病情、患者意愿和岗位条件允许的前提下,依据准备状态、现实工作能力和具体支持需求实施分层护理。
Objective
2
Treatment burden
functional limitations
and illness uncertainty following disease onset substantially compromise income sources
occupational functioning
and social participation among young and middle-aged patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD). Categorizing them simply as "not return-to-work" fails to reflect differences in their intention
action readiness
and support needs. This study aims to identify the latent return-to-work readiness statuses among young and middle-aged CKD patients who had not returned to work
to compare disease-related factors
work ability
and psychosocial characteristics across different statuses
and to analyze factors associated with class memberships
thereby providing evidence for stratified and individualized return-to-work support.
Methods
2
A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from a concurrent CKD survey carried out from January to June 2026 with convenience sampling in the outpatient clinic and inpatient ward of Department of Nephrology
South Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China. A total of 260 young and middle-aged CKD patients who had not returned to work were screened out for analysis
including 128 males and 132 females
with a mean age of 43.00(33.00
51.25) years. Items 1 to 13 of the Readiness for Return-to-Work Scale(RRTW) were used as observed indicators
and latent profile models with 1 to 7 classes were compared. Profile differences of different latent classes were examined using Kruskal-Wallis H test and Monte Carlo
Chi
-square test. Backward stepwise multinomial logistic regression based on the Akaike information criterion(AIC) was performed using the high-action-readiness profile as the reference
and 1
000 bootstrap resamples were employed to assess the model-selection and directional stability.
Results
2
Based on model fit
classification quality
class size
and clinical interpretability
a 5-profile model was finally selected
with a Bayesian information criterion(BIC)=7 835.4
entropy=0.949
smallest class=11.5%
minimum average posterior probability=0.954
identifying 61 cases(23.5%) of high action readiness
72 cases(27.7%) of moderate readiness
30 cases(11.5%) of low intention
66 cases(25.4%) of high support need-insufficient action
and 31 cases(11.9%) of high perceived barriers-help seeking. Compared with high action readiness
higher curren
t work ability was associated with lower odds of moderate readiness [odds ratio(
OR
)=0.521
95% confidence interval(
CI
): 0.334 to 0.812
]
low intention(
OR
=0.179
95%
CI
: 0.098 to 0.325)
high support need-insufficient action(
OR
=0.401
95%
CI
: 0.255 to 0.630)
and high perceived barriers-help seeking(
OR
=0.243
95%
CI
: 0.139 to 0.423
all
P
<
0.01). Fair/poor self-rated health was associated with the high support need-insufficient action profile(
OR
=3.076
95%
CI
: 1.187 to 7.971
P
=0.021). Bootstrap inclusion frequencies were 100.0% for current work ability and 99.7% for expected work ability in 2 years
with directional consistency of 99.7% to 100.0%.
Conclusion
2
Young and middle-aged CKD patients who have not returned to work can be identified as 5 distinct return-to-work readiness statuses
and current work ability and expected work ability for the next 2 years are the most stable distinguishing characteristics. Clinical nursing care should not set “returning to work as soon as possible” as a uniform goal; instead
stratified nursing support should be implemented according to readiness states
actual work ability
and specific support needs
disease condition
patient willingness
and job conditions permit.when the patient’s medical condition
preferences
and job conditions permit
Stevens P E , Ahmed S B , Carrero J J , et al . KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease [J]. Kidney Int , 2024 , 105 ( 4 ): S117 - S314 . DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018 .
Kovesdy C P . Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022 [J]. Kidney Int Suppl , 2022 , 12 ( 1 ): 7 - 11 . DOI: 10.1016/j.kisu.2021.11.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kisu.2021.11.003 .
Carlsen R K , Kirkeskov L , Riis M S , et al . Employment before and after initiation of dialysis or kidney transplantation—a Danish nationwide registry-based cohort study [J]. BMC Nephrol , 2025 , 26 ( 1 ): 48 . DOI: 10.1186/s12882-025-03969-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-03969-9 .
Motiei M , Attarchi M , Ramezanzadeh E . The effect of workability-related factors in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis [J]. BMC Nephrol , 2024 , 25 ( 1 ): 460 . DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03904-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03904-4 .
Alma M A , van der Mei S F , Brouwer S , et al . Sustained employment, work disability and work functioning in CKD patients: a cross-sectional survey study [J]. J Nephrol , 2023 , 36 ( 3 ): 731 - 743 . DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01476-w http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01476-w .
Zhang A , Martin A , Manera K , et al . Paid employment and ability to work among people receiving dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative studies [J]. Am J Kidney Dis , 2026 , 87 ( 6 ): 761 - 774.e1 . DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2026.01.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2026.01.008 .
Choi S , Jang S Y , Choi E , et al . Association between prevalence and severity of chronic kidney disease and employment status: a nationwide study in Korea [J]. BMC Public Health , 2024 , 24 ( 1 ): 216 . DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17338-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17338-4 .
Bay S S , Kamaruzaman L , Mohd R , et al . Work disability and employment status among advanced chronic kidney disease patients [J]. PLoS One , 2024 , 19 ( 3 ): e0297378 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297378 .
Zhou J X , Wen Y , Duan D F , et al . A qualitative study on the return to work experiences and views of young and middle-aged patient with chronic kidney disease [J]. Qual Life Res , 2025 , 34 ( 8 ): 2419 - 2426 . DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-03994-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03994-z .
龚爱萍 , 徐骏 , 吉小静 , 等 . 中青年血液透析患者重返工作准备度现状及影响因素分析 [J]. 中华现代护理杂志 , 2023 , 29 ( 36 ): 4939 - 4944 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230807-00413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230807-00413 .
Gong A P , Xu J , Ji X J , et al . Current status and influencing factors of readiness for young and middle-aged hemodialysis patients to return to work [J]. Chin J Mod Nurs , 2023 , 29 ( 36 ): 4939 - 4944 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230807-00413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230807-00413 .
彭源 , 朱林芳 , 袁怀红 , 等 . 维持性血液透析患者重返工作准备度及其影响因素分析 [J]. 武警医学 , 2024 , 35 ( 3 ): 197 - 200 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2024.03.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2024.03.003 .
Peng Y , Zhu L F , Yuan H H , et al . Analysis of readiness and influencing factors of return to work in maintenance hemodialy-sis patients [J]. Med J Chin People’s Armed Police Forces , 2024 , 35 ( 3 ): 197 - 200 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2024.03.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2024.03.003 .
Popa A E , Bejenaru A , Mitrea E C , et al . Return to work after chronic disease: a theoretical framework for understanding the worker-employer dynamic [J]. Chronic Illn , 2023 , 19 ( 4 ): 704 - 718 . DOI: 10.1177/17423953221117852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17423953221117852 .
Morgan S , Davies A . Supporting individuals with chronic health conditions in the workplace: a scoping review [J]. Disabil Rehabil , 2026 , 48 ( 12 ): 3607 - 3622 . DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2578992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2578992 .
Franche R L , Corbière M , Lee H , et al . The Readiness for Return-To-Work(RRTW) scale: development and validation of a self-report staging scale in lost-time claimants with musculoskeletal disorders [J]. J Occup Rehabil , 2007 , 17 ( 3 ): 450 - 472 . DOI: 10.1007/s10926-007-9097-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9097-9 .
曹慧丽 , 何琨 , 齐倩倩 . 中文版重返工作准备度量表在乳腺癌患者中的信效度检验 [J]. 中国康复医学杂志 , 2019 , 34 ( 7 ): 801 - 807 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2019.07.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2019.07.010 .
Cao H L , He K , Qi Q Q . Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the readiness for return-to-work scale in breast cancer patients [J]. Chin J Rehabil Med , 2019 , 34 ( 7 ): 801 - 807 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2019.07.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2019.07.010 .
Spurk D , Hirschi A , Wang M , et al . Latent profile analysis: a review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research [J]. J Vocat Behav , 2020 , 120 : 103445 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445 .
Nylund-Gibson K , Choi A Y . Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis [J]. Transl Issues Psychol Sci , 2018 , 4 ( 4 ): 440 - 461 . DOI: 10.1037/tps0000176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176 .
Tein J Y , Coxe S , Cham H . Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis [J]. Struct Equ Modeling , 2013 , 20 ( 4 ): 640 - 657 . DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2013.824781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781 .
Von Elm E , Altman D G , Egger M , et al . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology(STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies [J]. Lancet , 2007 , 370 ( 9596 ): 1453 - 1457 . DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X .
马来记 , 周彤 , 金泰 , 等 . 工作能力指数表中文版的信度和效度 [J]. 劳动医学 , 2000 , 17 ( 2 ): 70 - 72 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3617.2000.02.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-3617.2000.02.002 .
Ma L J , Zhou T , Jin T , et al . Reliability and validity of work ability index in Chinese version [J]. J Labour Med , 2000 , 17 ( 2 ): 70 - 72 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3617.2000.02.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-3617.2000.02.002 .
于肖楠 , 张建新 . 自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较 [J]. 心理科学 , 2007 , 30 ( 5 ): 1169 - 1171 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2007.05.038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2007.05.038 .
Yu X N , Zhang J X . A comparison between the Chinese version of ego-resiliency scale and Connor-Davidson resilience scale [J]. Psychol Sci , 2007 , 30 ( 5 ): 1169 - 1171 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2007.05.038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2007.05.038 .
Zimet G D , Dahlem N W , Zimet S G , et al . The multidimensional scale of perceived social support [J]. J Pers Assess , 1988 , 52 ( 1 ): 30 - 41 . DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 .
王才康 , 胡中锋 , 刘勇 . 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究 [J]. 应用心理学 , 2001 , 7 ( 1 ): 37 - 40 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007 .
Wang C K , Hu Z F , Liu Y . Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of general self-efficacy scale [J]. Chin J Appl Psychol , 2001 , 7 ( 1 ): 37 - 40 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007 .
龚栩 , 谢熹瑶 , 徐蕊 , 等 . 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告 [J]. 中国临床心理学杂志 , 2010 , 18 ( 4 ): 443 - 446 . DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2010.04.020 http://dx.doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2010.04.020 .
Gong X , Xie X Y , Xu R , et al . Psychometric properties of the Chinese versions of DASS-21 in Chinese college students [J]. Chin J Clin Psychol , 2010 , 18 ( 4 ): 443 - 446 . DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2010.04.020 http://dx.doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2010.04.020 .
Jensen C , Kvalheim T R , Tjøsvoll S O , et al . Self-rated work ability predicts return to work after occupational rehabilitation [J]. Front Rehabil Sci , 2026 , 7 : 1731625 . DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2026.1731625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2026.1731625 .
Novick T K , Osuna M , Emery C , et al . Patients’ perspectives on health-related social needs and recommendations for interventions: a qualitative study [J]. Am J Kidney Dis , 2024 , 83 ( 6 ): 739 - 749 . DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.11.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.11.005 .
Perez J , Niu J B , Baerman E , et al . Association between access to alternatives to daytime in-center hemodialysis and employment among patients with kidney failure [J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol , 2025 , 20 ( 11 ): 1594 - 1603 . DOI: 10.2215/CJN.0000000819 http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000000819 .
Hirth R A , Guro P A , Imtiaz A , et al . Changes in employment status after initiation of peritoneal and in-center hemodialysis [J]. Am J Kidney Dis , 2026 , 87 ( 5 ): 621 - 633.e1 . DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.11.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.11.007 .
Wang Y X , Qiu Y , Ren L Y , et al . Social support, family resilience and psychological resilience among maintenance hemodialysis patients: a longitudinal study [J]. BMC Psychiatry , 2024 , 24 ( 1 ): 76 . DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05526-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05526-4 .
Safi F , Areshtanab H N , Ghafourifard M , et al . The association between self-efficacy, perceived social support, and family resilience in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study [J]. BMC Nephrol , 2024 , 25 ( 1 ): 207 . DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03629-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03629-4 .
0
Views
3
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
