1.401331 重庆,重庆师范大学生命科学学院
2.400038 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学):药学与检验医学系
3.400038 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学):第一附属医院骨科
Received:14 January 2024,
Revised:2024-02-25,
Published:30 June 2024
移动端阅览
Yuan CHEN, Chen GAO, Yuhang LI, et al. Construction of self-assembled nanoparticle tumor vaccine OVA257-264-mi3 and evaluation of its protective efficacy[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(12): 1361-1368.
Yuan CHEN, Chen GAO, Yuhang LI, et al. Construction of self-assembled nanoparticle tumor vaccine OVA257-264-mi3 and evaluation of its protective efficacy[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(12): 1361-1368. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401050.
目的
2
构建SpyCatcher-mi3纳米颗粒疫苗递送载体,评价其在增强卵清蛋白CD8
+
T细胞表位肽OVA
257-264
免疫原性和在小鼠荷瘤模型中免疫保护效果。
方法
2
SpyCatcher-mi3蛋白由大肠杆菌表达,依次经亲和层析、阴离子交换层析纯化得到;合成OVA
257-264
-SpyTag多肽,通过SpyTag/SpyCatcher蛋白质连接系统构建纳米颗粒OVA
257-264
-mi3;通过细胞溶血实验和细胞毒性实验评价OVA
257-264
-mi3体外安全性,记录小鼠体重变化和镜检脏器组织切片HE染色评价OVA
257-264
-mi3体内安全性;将6~8周龄,18~20 g,SPF级,雌性C57BL/6小鼠按随机数字表法分为OVA
257-264
-mi3组、OVA
257-264
组和Control组,每组14只,分别于第0、14、28天免疫小鼠,末次免疫后第14天通过ELISpot检测其脾脏淋巴细胞中IFN-γ分泌细胞数量评价其免疫原性;在小鼠荷瘤模型上通过核磁共振成像等手段评价纳米颗粒疫苗OVA
257-264
-mi3的保护效果。
结果
2
SpyCatcher-mi3和OVA
257-264
-mi3均自组装形成均一稳定的纳米颗粒,平均粒径约为43.8 nm和91.3 nm;OVA
257-264
-mi3在体内外均具有良好的安全性;OVA
257-264
-mi3组小鼠每1×10
6
个脾脏淋巴细胞中IFN-γ分泌细胞数量达253,显著高于OVA
257-264
组(
P
<0.05);OVA
257-264
-mi3组小鼠第22天荷瘤体积约151.1 mm
3
,显著小于OVA
257-264
组(
P
<0.05),且观察期内生存率达60%,显著高于OVA
257-264
组(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
成功构建了纳米颗粒疫苗OVA
257-264
-mi3,其增强肿瘤抗原表位肽OVA
257-264
免疫原性,在小鼠荷瘤模型中保护效果良好,为肿瘤新抗原疫苗的研究提供了理论基础。
Objective
2
To construct SpyCatcher-mi3 nanoparticle vaccine delivery vectors
evaluate their role in enhancing the immunogenicity of the ovalbumin CD8
+
T-cell epitope peptide
OVA
257-264
and determine its protective effect in a model which mice were immunized and subcutaneously challenged with E.G7-OVA tumor cells.
Methods
2
SpyCatcher-mi3 proteins were expressed by
E.coli
and purified by affinity chromatography and anion exchange chromatography sequentially. OVA
257-264
-SpyTag peptide was obtained by synthesis. The OVA
257-264
-mi3 nanoparticles were produced by the SpyTag/SpyCatcher system. The toxicity of OVA
257-264
-mi3 was evaluated using hemolysis assay
CCK-8 assay and mouse experiment. A total of 42 female SPF-grade C57BL/6 mice (6~8 weeks old
18~20 g) were randomly divided into OVA
257-264
-mi3
OVA
257-264
and control groups
with 14 mice in each group. Then the mice in each group were immunized on days 0
14 and 28. In 14 d after the last immunization
the amounts of spot-forming cells (SFCs
indicating IFN-γ secreting cells in splenic lymphocytes) were determined using ELISpot assay to evaluate their immunogenicity. After the immunized mice were subcutaneously implanted with E.G7-OVA
tumor cells
the antitumor effect of the vaccine in prophylactic xenograft tumor model was evaluate by observing tumor volumes with a caliper and tumor growth with MRI.
Results
2
Both SpyCatcher-mi3 and OVA
257-264
-mi3 could be self-assembled to form homogeneous and stable nanoparticles
with an average particle size of about 43.8 and 91.3 nm
respectively. The OVA
257-264
-mi3 was safe for
in vitro
and
in vivo
toxicity evaluation. The number of IFN-γ secreting cells per 1×10
6
splenic lymphocytes reached 253 in the OVA
257-264
-mi3 group of mice
significantly higher than that in the OVA
257-264
group and the Control group (
P
<
0.05). The tumor volume of mice in the OVA
257-264
-mi3 group was about 151.1 mm
3
on day 22
which was significantly smaller than that of the OVA
257-264
group and the Control group (
P
<
0.05)
and the survival rate during the observation period reached 60%
which was significantly higher than that of the OVA
257-264
groups (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Nanoparticle vaccine OVA
257-264
-mi3 is successfully constructed
and it shows enhancing effect on the immunogenicity of the antigen epitope peptide
and exerts protective effect on prophylactic xenograft tumor model
providing a theoretical basis for the research of tumor neoantigen vaccines.
BERRAONDO P, SANMAMED M F, OCHOA M C, et al . Cytokines in clinical cancer immunotherapy[J ] . Br J Cancer, 2019, 120(1): 6-15. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0328-y.
BENCI J L, JOHNSON L R, CHOA R, et al . Opposing functions of interferon coordinate adaptive and innate immune responses to cancer immune checkpoint blockade[J ] . Cell, 2019, 178(4): 933-948. e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.019.
ADACHI K, KANO Y, NAGAI T, et al . IL-7 and CCL19 expression in CAR-T cells improves immune cell infiltration and CAR-T cell survival in the tumor[J ] . Nat Biotechnol, 2018, 36(4): 346-351. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4086.
PEREZ C R, DE PALMA M. Engineering dendritic cell vaccines to improve cancer immunotherapy[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 5408. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13368-y.
CHEN F M, WANG Y J, GAO J, et al . Nanobiomaterial-based vaccination immunotherapy of cancer[J ] . Biomaterials, 2021, 270: 120709. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120709.
XIE N, SHEN G B, GAO W, et al . Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy[J ] . Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023, 8(1): 9. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-022-01270-x.
DUNN G P, BRUCE A T, IKEDA H, et al . Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape[J ] . Nat Immunol, 2002, 3(11): 991-998. DOI: 10.1038/ni1102-991.
PENG M, MO Y Z, WANG Y A, et al . Neoantigen vaccine: an emerging tumor immunotherapy[J ] . Mol Cancer, 2019, 18(1): 128. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-019-1055-6.
KANG Y F, SUN C, ZHUANG Z, et al . Rapid development of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain self-assembled nanoparticle vaccine candidates[J ] . ACS Nano, 2021, 15(2): 2738-2752. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08379.
COHEN A A, VAN DOREMALEN N, GREANEY A J, et al . Mosaic RBD nanoparticles protect against challenge by diverse sarbecoviruses in animal models[J ] . Science, 2022, 377(6606): eabq0839. DOI: 10.1126/science.abq0839.
LEE Y, KIM M, KANG J Y, et al . Protein cages engine ered for interaction-driven selective encapsulation of biomolecules[J ] . ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14(31): 35357-35365. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c06924.
ZAKERI B, FIERER J O, CELIK E, et al . Peptide tag forming a rapid covalent bond to a protein, through engineering a bacterial adhesin[J ] . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012, 109(12): E690-E697. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1115485109.
CHOU P Y, LIN S Y, WU Y N, et al . Glycosylation of OVA antigen-loaded PLGA nanoparticles enhances DC-targeting for cancer vaccination[J ] . J Control Release, 2022, 351: 970-988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.002.
BRUUN T U J, ANDERSSON A C, DRAPER S J, et al . Engineering a rugged nanoscaffold to enhance plug-and-display vaccination[J ] . ACS Nano, 2018, 12(9): 8855-8866. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02805.
SHAHBAZI M A, SANTOS H A. Revolutionary impact of nanovaccines on immunotherapy[J]. Eur J Mol Clin Med, 2014, 2(2): 44. DOI: 10.1016/j.nhtm.2014.11.058.
EL-SAY K M, EL-SAWY H S. Polymeric nanoparticles: promising platform for drug delivery[J]. Int J Pharm, 2017, 528(1/2): 675-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.052.
TAN T K, RIJAL P, RAHIKAINEN R, et al . A COVID-19 vaccine candidate using SpyCatcher multimerization of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain induces potent neutralising antibody responses[J ] . Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 542. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20654-7.
LIU Z H, XU H L, HAN G W, et al . A self-assembling nanoparticle: implications for the development of thermostable vaccine candidates[J ] . Int J Biol Macromol, 2021, 183: 2162-2173. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.024.
HAN J A, KANG Y J, SHIN C, et al . Ferritin protein cage nanoparticles as versatile antigen delivery nanoplatforms for dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine development[J ] . Nanomed-Nanotechnol Biol Med, 2014, 10(3): 561-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2013.11.003.
DING B B, ZHENG P, JIANG F, et al . MnO x nanospikes as nanoadjuvants and immunogenic cell death drugs with enhanced antitumor immunity and antimetastatic effect[J ] . Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59(38): 16381-16384. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202005111..
WANG S H, GAO J, WANG Z J. Outer membrane vesicles for vaccination and targeted drug delivery[J]. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol, 2019, 11(2): e1523. DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1523.
XIANG S D, SCHOLZEN A, MINIGO G, et al . Pathogen recognition and development of particulate vaccines: does size matter?[J ] . Methods, 2006, 40(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.05.016.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
