400042 重庆,陆军特色医学中心泌尿外科
Received:10 September 2023,
Revised:2023-10-19,
Published:15 June 2024
移动端阅览
Dachun JIN, Yong LUO, Peng WANG, et al. Microscopic electric rotary grinding combined with graft repairing in patients with Peyronie's disease: a report of 21 cases[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(11): 1291-1297.
Dachun JIN, Yong LUO, Peng WANG, et al. Microscopic electric rotary grinding combined with graft repairing in patients with Peyronie's disease: a report of 21 cases[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(11): 1291-1297. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202309044.
目的
2
探讨在显微镜下应用电动磨钻进行白膜斑块磨削后,应用睾丸鞘膜或牛心包进行修补治疗阴茎硬结症的手术技巧和经验。
方法
2
采用回顾性队列研究方法,收集我院于2021年1月至2023年5月收治的因阴茎硬结症导致阴茎严重弯曲并行显微镜下白膜斑块电动磨削及移植物修补术治疗的21例患者的临床资料和信息,观察其短期和中期疗效。
结果
2
本组21例患者中12例(57.1%)采用单侧鞘膜修补,3例(14.3%)采用双侧鞘膜修补,6例(28.6%)采用牛心包修补。手术时长(272±69) min,术后随访(12.1±7.2)个月。17例(81.0%)患者勃起时阴茎完全伸直,无弯曲,无缩窄,4例(19.0%)略有背侧弯曲,但弯曲度<10°,患者均对其阴茎勃起时形态满意。术后测量阴茎长度变化[+(1.1±0.5)]cm,9例(42.9%)诉术后早期存在阴茎头感觉麻木感,持续(3.2±1.9)个月后自行消失。患者均能够顺利完成性生活,阴茎勃起硬度评分为3.8分。手术后整体满意率为90.5%。
结论
2
显微镜下Buck’s筋膜的精细分离有利于可靠保护阴茎背侧神经血管;应用电动磨钻进行白膜斑块的磨削可更加充分而精准地松解白膜;应用睾丸鞘膜或牛心包进行白膜缺损修补治疗阴茎硬结症总体效果良好,患者综合满意度高,值得推广应用。
Objective
2
To explore the surgical techniques and experiences in the treatment of Peyronie's disease using electric rotary grinding of tunica albuginea plaques followed by graft repair with tunica vaginalis or bovine pericardium under a microscope.
Methods
2
A retrospective cohort study was performed on 21 patients with severe penile curvature due to Peyronie's disease admitted in our department from January 2021 and May 2023. All of them underwent microscopic electric rotary grinding of tunica albuginea plaques followed by graft repair surgery. Short-term and mid-term outcomes were observed.
Results
2
For the 21 enrolled patients
12 (57.1%) underwent repair using unilateral tunica vaginalis
3 (14.3%) underwent repair using bilateral tunica vaginalis
and 6 (28.6%) underwent repair using bovine pericardium. The operation time was 170~385 (average 272±69) min
and the average postoperative follow-up duration was 3~24 (average 12.1±7.2) months. Seventeen patients (81.0%) had their penis fully extended
while 4 patients (19.0%) had slight dorsal curvature
which was less than 10°. All patients were satisfied with the shape of their penis during erection. The change in penile length was +(1.1±0.5) cm
and 9 patients (42.9%) reported early postoperative penile head numbness
which spontaneously resolved after an average duration of 3.2±1.9 months. All patients were able to successfully engage in sexual activity
with an average penile erection hardness score of 3.8. The overall satisfaction rate was 90.5% postoperatively.
Conclusion
2
Meticulous dissection of Buck's fascia under a microscope is advantageous in reliably preserving dorsal neurovascular structures. Application of an electric grinding drill for plaque ablation allows for more precise release of the tunica. Graft repair of tunica albuginea defects with testicular tunica vaginalis or bovine pericardium for Peyronie's disease yields overall favorable clinical outcomes and obtains high satisfaction. It is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.
HAUCK E W, WEIDNER W. François de la Peyronie and the disease named after him[J]. Lancet, 2001, 357(9273): 2049-2051. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05119-9.
CHUNG E, RALPH D, KAGIOGLU A, et al . Evidence-based management guidelines on Peyronie's disease[J ] . J Sex Med, 2016, 13(6): 905-923. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.062.
STUNTZ M, PERLAKY A, DES VIGNES F, et al . The prevalence of Peyronie's disease in the United States: a population-based study[J ] . PLoS One, 2016, 11(2): e0150157. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150157.
邓春华. 男科疾病诊断治疗指南(2022版)[M]. 北京: 中华医学电子音像出版社, 2022.
DENG C H. The giudeline for andrology disease diagnosis and treatments (version 2022)[M]. Beijing: Chinese Medical Multimidia Press, 2022.
ALMEIDA J, FELÍCIO J, MARTINS F. Surgical planning and strategies for Peyronie's disease[J]. Sex Med Rev, 2021, 9(3): 478-487. DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.07.008.
SHERER B A, LEVINE L A. Contemporary review of treatment options for Peyronie's disease[J]. Urology, 2016, 95: 16-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.009.
CHUNG P H, HAN T M, RUDNIK B, et al . Peyronie's disease: what do we know and how do we treat it?[J ] . Can J Urol, 2020, 27(S3): 11-19.
GREEN B, FLORES A, WARNER J, et al . Comparison of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum to surgery for the management of Peyronie's disease: a randomized trial[J ] . J Urol, 2023, 210(5): 791-802. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003634..
WAYNE G F, CORDON B H. Contemporary surgical and non-surgical management of Peyronie's disease[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2018, 7(4): 603-617. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.04.06.
KADIOGLU A, KÜÇÜKDURMAZ F, SANLI O. Current status of the surgical management of Peyronie's disease[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2011, 8(2): 95-106. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.233.
RALPH D, GONZALEZ-CADAVID N, MIRONE V, et al . The management of Peyronie's disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines[J ] . J Sex Med, 2010, 7(7): 2359-2374. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01850.x.
NEHRA A, ALTEROWITZ R, CULKIN D J, et al . Peyronie's disease: AUA guideline[J ] . J Urol, 2015, 194(3): 745-753. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.098.
BOLE R, ZIEGELMANN M, AVANT R, et al . Patient's choice of health information and treatment modality for Peyronie's disease: a long-term assessment[J ] . Int J Impot Res, 2018, 30(5): 243-248. DOI: 10.1038/s41443-018-0028-4.
GARAFFA G, TROST L W, SEREFOGLU E C, et al . Understanding the course of Peyronie's disease[J ] . Int J Clin Pract, 2013, 67(8): 781-788. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12129.
BILGUTAY A N, PASTUSZAK A W. Peyronie's disease: a review of etiology, diagnosis, and management[J]. Curr Sex Health Rep, 2015, 7(2): 117-131. DOI: 10.1007/s11930-015-0045-y.
LENTZ A C, CARSON C C 3rd. Peyronie's surgery: graft choices and outcomes[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2009, 10(6): 460. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-009-0073-0.
KENDIRCI M, HELLSTROM W J G. Critical analysis of surgery for Peyronie's disease[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2004, 14(6): 381-388. DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200411000-00015.
KADIOGLU A, AKMAN T, SANLI O, et al . Surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease: a critical analysis. Eur Urol, 2006, 50(2): 235-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.030.
DALKIN B L, CARTER M F. Venogenic impotence following dermal graft repair for Peyronie's disease[J]. J Urol, 1991, 146(3): 849-851. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37941-7.
LEVINE L A. Partial plaque excision and grafting (PEG) for Peyronie's disease[J]. J Sex Med, 2011, 8(7): 1842-1845. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02370.x.
LUE T F, EL-SAKKA A I. Venous patch graft for Peyronie's disease. Part Ⅰ: technique[J]. J Urol, 1998: 2047-2049. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199812010-00029.
HATZICHRISTODOULOU G, GSCHWEND J E, LAHME S. Surgical therapy of Peyronie's disease by partial plaque excision and grafting with collagen fleece: feasibility study of a new technique[J]. Int J Impot Res, 2013, 25(5): 183-187. DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2013.7.
SAMPAIO J S, PASSARINHO A. Surgical correction of severe Peyronie's disease without plaque excision. A new approach[J]. Eur Urol, 1989, 16(6): 460-462. DOI: 10.1159/000471640.
CASTRO A, SIMOES D O, DIAS J, et al . V04-06 multiple transverse dorsal incisions patched with TachoSil Ⓡ in the surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease: preliminary results[J ] . J Urol, 2019, 201(Supplement 4): e493-e. DOI: 10.1097/01.JU.0000555989.74360.b1..
GARCÍA-GÓMEZ B, RALPH D, LEVINE L, et al . Grafts for Peyronie's disease: a comprehensive review[J ] . Andrology, 2018, 6(1): 117-126. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12421.Epub2017Dec20.
HATZICHRISTODOULOU G. Grafting techniques for Peyronie's disease[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2016, 5(3): 334-341. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.03.16.
RICE P G, SOMANI B K, REES R W. Twenty years of plaque incision and grafting for Peyronie's disease: a review of literature[J]. Sex Med, 2019,7(2): 115-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.01.001.
SALONIA A, BETTOCCHI C, BOERI L, et al . European Association of Urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction[J ] . Eur Urol, 2021, 80(3): 333-3 57. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.007.
HATZICHRISTODOULOU G. Evolution of the surgical sealing patch TachoSil Ⓡ in Peyronie's disease reconstructive surgery: technique and contemporary literature review[J ] . World J Urol, 2020, 38(2): 315-321. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02792-w.
0
Views
38
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
