1.400037 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院:营养科
2.400037 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院:输血科
Received:19 August 2023,
Revised:2024-01-08,
Published:15 May 2024
移动端阅览
Heng LU, Xiangmin NI, Shengcai YU, et al. Effect and underlying mechanism of glutamine on radiosensitivity of colon cancer cells[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(9): 1007-1014.
Heng LU, Xiangmin NI, Shengcai YU, et al. Effect and underlying mechanism of glutamine on radiosensitivity of colon cancer cells[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(9): 1007-1014. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202308077.
目的
2
观察不同浓度谷氨酰胺(glutamine,Gln)对结直肠癌HT-29细胞放射敏感性的影响,并探讨其可能机制。
方法
2
体外培养HT-29细胞,将对数生长期的HT-29细胞按照Gln不同浓度设置对照组(2 mmol/L,培养基基础浓度)、实验组Ⅰ(4 mmol/L)、实验组Ⅱ(6 mmol/L)、实验组Ⅲ(8 mmol/L),预处理2 h后给予Co 60源放射。通过CCK-8法检测未放射与放射后不同浓度Gln对细胞活力的影响;克隆形成实验检测放射后不同浓度Gln对细胞放射敏感性的影响;活性氧(ROS)试剂盒检测放射后24 h细胞ROS水平;流式细胞仪检测放射后48 h细胞凋亡率;蛋白印迹法测定放射后各组细胞Nrf2、HO-1、cleaved-Caspase3蛋白的表达水平。
结果
2
未放射的HT-29细胞在Gln干预24 h后实验组Ⅱ、实验组Ⅲ细胞活力明显高于对照组、实验组Ⅰ(
P
<0.05)。HT-29细胞放射24 h后,各实验组细胞活力明显高于对照组(
P
<0.05);放射后14 d,各实验组细胞克隆形成数均高于对照组(
P
<0.05);放射后24 h,各实验组ROS水平均低于对照组(
P
<0.05);放射后48 h,各实验组细胞凋亡率均低于对照组(
P
<0.05)。实验组ⅠNrf2表达高于对照组(
P
<0.05);实验组Ⅱ、Ⅲ Nrf2、HO-1表达均高于对照组和实验组Ⅰ(
P
<0.05),cleaved-Caspase3表达均低于对照组和实验组Ⅰ(
P
<0.05);实验组Ⅲ cleaved-Caspase3表达低于实验组Ⅱ(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
谷氨酰胺能显著降低HT-29细胞的放射敏感性,其机制与减轻氧化应激损伤和减少细胞凋亡有关,这可能不利于结直肠癌患者放疗。
Objective
2
To observe the effect of different concentrations of glutamine (Gln) on the radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer HT-29 cells and explore the possible mechanism.
Methods
2
According to different Gln concentrations
HT-29 cells at logarithmical growth were divided into control group (2 mmol/L
as the basal medium concentration group) and experimental groups Ⅰ
Ⅱ and Ⅲ (4
6 and 8 mmol/L). After a 2-hour pre-treatment
all groups were exposed to 8 Gy irradiation of a Co-60 radiation source. CCK-8 assay and clonal formation assay were used respectively to explore the effects of different Gln concentrations on cell viability and cell radiosensitivity after irradiation. The level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in each group was measured in 24 h after irradiation
and the apoptotic rate was detected with flow cytometry in 48 h after irradiation. The protein expression levels of Nrf2
HO-1
and cleaved-Caspase3 were determined by Western blotting.
Results
2
In 24 h after Gln intervention
the cell viability of experimental groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ of non-irradiated HT-29 cells was significantly higher than that of the control group and of experimental group Ⅰ (
P
<
0.05). In 24 h after radiation
the cell viability of each experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (
P
<
0.05). In 14 d after radiation
there were more clone formation in each experimental group than the control group (
P
<
0.05). The ROS level was significantly lower in each experimental group than the control group in 24 h after radiation (
P
<
0.05). After 48 h of radiation
the apoptotic rate was notably lower in each experimental group than the control group (
P
<
0.05). The expression level of Nrf2 in the experimental group Ⅰ was higher than that of the control group (
P
<
0.05)
those of Nrf2 and HO-1 in the experimental groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were higher than those of the control group and experimental group Ⅰ (
P
<
0.05). While the expression of cleaved-Caspase3 in the experimental groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ was lower than the control group and experimental group Ⅰ (
P
<
0.05)
and it in the experimental group Ⅲ was lower than that of experimental group Ⅱ (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Gln can significantly reduce the radiosensitivity of HT-29 cells
which is associated with its reducing oxidative stress damage and reducing cell apoptosis. Our results suggest that Gln might be detrimental to radiation therapy in patients with colorectal cancer.
SEDLAK J C, YILMAZÖH, ROPER J. Metabolism and colorectal cancer[J]. Annu Rev Pathol, 2023, 18: 467-492. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-031521-041113.
MORGAN E, ARNOLD M, GINI A, et al . Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN[J ] . Gut, 2023, 72(2): 338-344. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736.
SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J ] . CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
DOSSA F, CHESNEY T R, ACUNA S A, et al . A watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer after a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J ] . Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 2(7): 501-513. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30074-2.
CAI S J, YANG L F. Present situation and prospect of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. China Ind Econ, 2018, 25(11): 1281-1285. DOI: 10.7507/1007-9424.201811010.
LEE H H, CHEN C H, HUANG Y H, et al . Biomarkers of favorable vs . unfavorable responses in locally advanced rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J ] . Cells, 2022, 11(10): 1611. DOI: 10.3390/cells11101611..
WANIGASOORIYA K, TYLER R, BARROS-SILVA J D, et al . Radiosensitising cancer using phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (AKT) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors[J ] . Cancers, 2020, 12(5): 1278. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051278.
KIM M H, KIM H. The roles of glutamine in the intestine and its implication in intestinal diseases[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(5): 1051. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18051051.
WEI X L, ZHAO T Y, LIU J N, et al . Effect of glutamine-enhanced parenteral nutrition on intestinal function and stress state in elderly patients with colorectal cancer[J ] . Food Nutr China, 2022, 28(4): 83-86. DOI: 10.19870/j.cnki.11-3716/ts.2022.04.014.
DE L, GU P F, DOU Q, et al . Effect of glutamate-enhanced enteral nutrition on nutr ition, immunity and inflammatory response in patients with colon cancer[J ] . Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil, 2020, 27(8): 925-928. DOI: 10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2020.08.08.
ALTMAN B J, STINE Z E, DANG C V.From Krebs to clinic: glutamine metabolism to cancer therapy[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2016, 16(10): 619-634. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2016.71.
SHARMA S, AGNIHOTRI N, KUMAR S. Targeting fuel pocket of cancer cell metabolism: a focus on glutaminolysis[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2022, 198: 114943. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.114943.
GENZEL Y, RITTER J B, KÖNIG S, et al . Substitution of glutamine by pyruvate to reduce ammonia formation and growth inhibition of mammalian cells[J ] . Biotechnol Prog, 2005, 21(1): 58-69. DOI: 10.1021/bp049827d.
TANG M S, QIN Y Z, DAI G, et al . Different concentrations of glutamine in rat adipose tissue-derived messenchymal stem cell cultured in vitro [J ] . N Med, 2012, 43(5): 322-326, 351. DOI: 10.3969/g.issn.0253-9802.2012.05.013..
SHAGHAGHI Z, POLGARDANI N Z, ABBASI S, et al . Etodolac enhances the radiosensitivity of irradiated HT-29 human colorectal c ancer cells[J ] . Curr Radiopharm, 2022, 15(3): 242-248. DOI: 10.2174/1874471015666220321143139.
SCHONEWOLF C A, MEHTA M, SCHIFF D, et al . Autophagy inhibition by chloroquine sensitizes HT-29 colorectal cancer cells to concurrent chemoradiation[J ] . World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2014, 6(3): 74-82. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i3.74.
DAYE D, WELLEN K E. Metabolic reprogramming in cancer: unraveling the role of glutamine in tumorigenesis[J]. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2012, 23(4): 362-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.02.002.
GUO J, SATOH K, TABATA S, et al . Reprogramming of glutamine metabolism via glutamine synthetase silencing induces cisplatin resistance in A2780 ovarian cancer cells[J ] . BMC Cancer, 2021, 21(1): 174. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07879-5..
LEE S Y, JEONG E K, JU M K, et al . Induction of metastasis, cancer stem cell phenotype, and oncogenic metabolism in cancer cells by ionizing radiation[J ] . Mol Cancer, 2017, 16(1): 10. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-016-0577-4.
B DOMÈNECH E, MARFANY G. The relevance of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis and therapy of retinal dystrophies[J]. Antioxidants, 2020, 9(4): 347. DOI: 10.3390/antiox9040347.
REN X Y, LÉVEILLARD T. Modulating antioxidant systems as a therapeutic approach to retinal degeneration[J]. Redox Biol, 2022, 57: 102510. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102510.
SIES H, JONES D P. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2020, 21(7): 363-383. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3.
MA G F, ZHANG Z L, LI P, et al . Reprogramming of glutamine metabolism and its impact on immune response in the tumor microenvironment[J ] . Cell Commun Signal, 2022, 20(1): 114. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-022-00909-0.
BENHAR M. Oxidants, antioxidants and thiol redox switches in the control of regulated cell death pathways[J]. Antioxidants, 2020, 9(4): 309. DOI: 10.3390/antiox9040309.
KIM W, KIM H U, LEE H N, et al . Taurine chloramine stimulates efferocytosis through upregulation of Nrf2-mediated heme oxygenase-1 expression in murine macrophages: possible involvement of carbon monoxide[J ] . Antioxid Redox Signal, 2015, 23(2): 163-177. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2013.5825.
LUO J F, SHEN X Y, LIO C K, et al . Activation of Nrf2/HO-1 pathway by nardochinoid C inhibits inflammation and oxidative stress in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages[J ] . Front Pharmacol, 2018, 9: 911. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00911.
SAHA S, BUTTARI B, PANIERI E, et al . An overview of Nrf2 signaling pathway and its role in inflammation[J ] . Molecules, 2020, 25(22): 5474. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225474.
ASADI M, TAGHIZADEH S, KAVIANI E, et al . Caspase-3: structure, function, and biotechnological aspects[J ] . Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 2022, 69(4): 1633-1645. DOI: 10.1002/bab.2233.
0
Views
191
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
