Ruoxi HUYAN, Zhe WU, Shanshan XU, et al. Intelligent segmentation of prostate zones in MR images based on Vgg16-Unet[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(13): 1441-1449.
DOI:
Ruoxi HUYAN, Zhe WU, Shanshan XU, et al. Intelligent segmentation of prostate zones in MR images based on Vgg16-Unet[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(13): 1441-1449. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202211045.
Intelligent segmentation of prostate zones in MR images based on Vgg16-Unet
To create an intelligent segmentation model of deep learning based on the magnetic resonance (MR) images of the prostate zones.
Methods
2
The T2WI sequence data of 33 patients with prostate cancer
including 6 at T1 stage
15 at T2 stage
9 at T3 stage
and 3 at T4 stage
receiving MRI scanning in Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to October 2020 were collected. While
the T2WI sequence data of 346 patients with prostate cancer from the Prostate MRI Public Dataset provided by Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Netherlands were also collected. Then these totally 379 cases were randomly divided into training sets
validation sets and test sets at a ratio of 7 ∶1 ∶2 (265
38 and 76 cases
respectively). Based on Unet model
Vgg16 was used as the encoder
and multiple layers of convolution were used with the transfer learning strategy at the same time to build a Vgg16-Unet model. Then with a gold standard of the prostate zones (anterior fibrous matrix zone
central zone
peripheral zone
and transition zone) manually segmented by doctors
Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff surface distance (HD95) were employed to evaluate the segmentation accuracy of the prostate zones on the test set.
Results
2
The model achieved relatively higher accuracy of segmentation for anterior fibrous matrix zone
central zone
peripheral zone and transition zone on the test set. The average DSC was 56.95%
47.28%
80.78%
and 90.63%
and the average HD95 value was 20.84
20.02
15.39 and 11.20 mm
respectively. The volume predicted by the model was consistent with the volume measured by manual segmentation
and their differences were basically within the 95% consistency interval.
Conclusion
2
The segmentation accuracy of our Vgg16-Unet model is better than that of 3 classical variants
Unet
Unet++ and ResUnet++. The model can significantly improve the segmentation efficiency of prostate cancer MRI images and reduce the workload of clinicians.
关键词
Keywords
references
XIA C F, DONG X S, LI H, et al . Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants[J ] . Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(5): 584-590. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.
SIEGELR L, MILLER K D, JEMAL A. Cancer statistics, 2015[J]. CA A Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(1): 5-29. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21254.
HU X G, YANG H G. Novelprostate MRI segmentation method based on full convolutionDenseNet[J]. Appl Res Comput, 2020, 37(6): 1886-1889, 1894. DOI: 10.19734/j.issn.1001-3695.2018.11.0909.
KURATA Y, NISHIO M, KIDO A, et al . Automatic segmentation of the uterus on MRI using a convolutional neural network[J ] . Comput Biol Med, 2019, 114: 103438. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103438.
LEE B, YAMANAKKANAVAR N, CHOIJ Y. Automatic segmentation of brain MRI using a novel patch-wise U-net deep architecture[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(8): e0236493. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236493.
AFZALI A, BABAPOUR MOFRAD F, POULADIAN M. 2D statistical lung shape analysis using chest radiographs: modelling and segmentation[J]. J Digit Imaging, 2021, 34(3): 523-540. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00440-7.
ZABIHOLLAHY F, SCHIEDA N, KRISHNA JEYARAJ S, et al . Automated segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on T2-weighted (T2W) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map MR images using U-Nets[J ] . Med Phys, 2019, 46(7): 3078-3090. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13550.
LITJENSG, DEBATS O, BARENTSZ J, et al . Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer in MRI[J ] . IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2014, 33(5): 1083-1092. DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2014.2303821.
GRIMES D A, SCHULZ K F. An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359(9300): 57-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07283-5.
LIU Y R, LUO L X, LIU M F. Realization of window display method of DICOM image on Windows system[J]. Telecom World, 2020, 27(1): 150. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4222.2020.01.094.
ALSHAMMARI A. Construction of VGG16 convolution neural Network (VGG16_CNN) classifier with NestNet-based segmentation paradigm for brain metastasis classification[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2022, 22(20): 8076. DOI: 10.3390/s22208076.
DENG J, DONG W, SOCHER R, et al . ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database[C ] //2009 IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2009: 248-255. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ..
HEK M, GIRSHICK R, DOLLÁR P. Rethinking ImageNet pre-training[EB/OL ] . [2018-11-21 ] . https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.08883 https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.08883 .
YU J, CAI L, CHEN C, et al. Cascade Path Augmentation Unet for bladder cancer segmentation in MRI[J ] . Med Phys, 2022, 49(7): 4622-4631. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15646.
KIRKLAND E J. Bilinear interpolation[M ] //Advanced computing in electron microscopy. Boston: Springer US, 2010: 261-263. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6533-2_12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6533-2_12 .
VUM H, GRIMBERGEN G, NYHOLM T, et al . Evaluation of multislice inputs to convolutional neural networks for medical image segmentation[J ] . Med Phys, 2020, 47(12): 6216-6231. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14391.
WU Y, ZHANG X Q. Artificial intelligence in medical image processing: progress andprospect[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2021, 43(18): 1707-1712. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202106194.
REN X H, XIANG L, NIE D, et al . Interleaved 3D-CNNs for joint segmentation of small-volume structures in head and neck CT images[J ] . Med Phys, 2018, 45(5): 2063-2075. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12837.
WU Z, PANG Y, MING Z, et al . Application of artificial intelligence technology in automatic delineation of organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy[J ] . Pract Oncol J, 2021, 35(2): 137-141. DOI: 10.11904/j.issn.1002-3070.2021.02.007.
LIU X, GAO G, HAN C, et al . Regional segmentation of prostate and clinical evaluation in T2WI image based on 3D U-Net model[J ] . J China Clin Med Imaging, 2022, 33(1): 33-38, 42. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2022.01.008.
KHAN Z, YAHYA N, ALSAIH K, et al . Evaluation of deep neural networks for semantic segmentation of prostate in T2W MRI[J ] . Sensors (Basel), 2020, 20(11): 3183. DOI: 10.3390/s20113183.
ZAVALA-ROMERO O, BRETOA L, XU I R, et al . Segmentation of prostate and prostate zones using deep learning: a multi-MRI vendor analysis[J ] . Al, 2020, 196(10): 932-942. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01607-x.
BARDIS M, HOUSHYAR R, CHANTADULY C, et al . Segmentation of the prostate transition zone and peripheral zone on MR images with deep learning[J ] . Radiol Imaging Cancer, 2021, 3(3): e200024. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021200024.
CUOCOLO R, COMELLI A, STEFANO A, et al . Deep learning whole-gland and zonal prostate segmentation on a public MRI dataset[J ] . J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 54(2): 452-459. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27585.
LI Y C, LIN C, ZHANG Y, et al . Automatic segmentation of prostate MRI based on 3D pyramid pooling Unet[J ] . Med Phys, 2023, 50(2): 906-921. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15895.