1.400038 重庆,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系
2.266000 山东 青岛,91951部队
Received:08 March 2022,
Revised:2022-04-27,
Published:15 October 2022
移动端阅览
Xiaoling ZHANG, Mengxue ZHAO, Xingya LIAO, et al. Compilation of Self-Image Scale for Military Personnel and relationship of self-image with mental health[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(19): 1938-1945.
Xiaoling ZHANG, Mengxue ZHAO, Xingya LIAO, et al. Compilation of Self-Image Scale for Military Personnel and relationship of self-image with mental health[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(19): 1938-1945. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202203060.
目的
2
研制军人自我形象量表,并探讨军人自我形象与心理健康状态之间的关系。
方法
2
采用问卷调查和网络爬取方法收集描述军人的形容词,经过词频清洗、词义清洗、同义词合并形成初始量表,再整群抽取陆、海、空、火箭军军人2 756名,并对其进行问卷调查,利用SPSS 26.0对所得数据进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、信度分析、Pearson相关分析,利用AMOS 21.0进行验证性因子分析。
结果
2
探索性因素分析发现该量表具有军事能力和军人品德两个因素,共12题,总方差解释率为77.227%;验证性因素分析发现RMSEA为0.075,NNFI为0.968;总量表及各因素Cronbach’α系数为:0.951、0.942、0.936,重测信度为0.807、0.791、0.794;军人自我形象与心理健康状态在统计学上负相关(
r
=-0.243,
P
<
0.01)。
结论
2
军人自我形象量表具有良好的信度、效度,可以作为心理学测量工具使用;军人自我形象是心理健康维护与促进的重要因素。
Objective
2
To develop a Self-Image Scale for Military Personnel
and to explore the relationship of self-image and mental health status.
Methods
2
Questionnaires and network crawling were used to collect adjectives describing soldiers. After word frequency cleaning
word meaning cleaning and synonym combination
an initial scale was formed. Then 2 756 soldiers were stratified from the units of army
navy
air force and rocket force and then surveyed with the initial scale. SPSS26.0 was used for item analysis
exploratory factor analysis
reliability analysis and Pearson correlation analysis. AMOS21.0 was used for confirmatory factor analysis.
Results
2
Exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale had 2 dimensions
military ability and military moral character. There were 12 questions in total
with a total variance explanation rate of 77.227%. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that RMSEA and NNFI we
re 0.075 and 0.968
respectively. The Cronbach'α coefficients of the total scale and each dimension were 0.951
0.942 and 0.936
and the retest reliability was 0.807
0.791 and 0.794
respectively. There was a negative correlation between self-image and mental health status (
r
=-0.243
P
<
0.01).
Conclusion
2
Our prepared Self-Image Scale for Military Personnel has good reliability and validity
and can be used as a psychological measurement tool. Self-image level of soldiersis an important factor in the maintenance and promotion of mental health.
GALLIHER R V, MCLEAN K C, SYED M. An integrated developmental model for studying identity content in context[J]. Dev Psychol, 2017, 53(11): 2011-2022. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000299.
HARDS E, ELLIS J, FISK J, et al . Negative view of the self and symptoms of depression in adolescents[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2020, 262: 143-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.012.
TAYLOR P J, USHER S, JOMAR K, et al . Investigating self-concept in self-harm: a repertory grid study[J ] . Psychol Psychother, 2021, 94(Suppl 2): 171-187. DOI: 10.1111/papt.12269.
RYUM T, VOGEL P A, WALDERHAUG E P, et al . The role of self-image as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome[J ] . Scand J Psychol, 2015, 56(1): 62-68. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12167.
MCLEAN K C, SYED M, SHUCARD H. Bringing identity content to the fore[J]. Emerg Adulthood, 2016, 4(5): 356-364. DOI: 10.1177/2167696815626820.
刘奕杉, 王玉琳, 李明鑫. 词频分析法中高频词阈值界定方法适用性的实证分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(9): 42-49. DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2017.09.007.
LIU Y S, WANG Y L, LI M X. An empirical analysis for the applicability of the methods of definition of high-frequency words in word frequency analysis[J]. Digit Libr Forum, 2017(9): 42-49. DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2017.09.007.
赖薇. 军人心理健康状态测评与眼动识别研究[D]. 重庆: 陆军军医大学, 2018.
LAI W. Study on the Assessment of military mental health status and the eye movement identification[D]. Chongqing: Army Medical University, 2018.
冯正直, 祖霞. 军人心理健康评价: 理论与模型[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2015, 37(22): 2207-2212. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201509149.
FENG Z Z, ZU X. Mental health assessment for military men: theories and model[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2015, 37(22): 2207-2212. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201509149.
MARKUS H. Unresolved issues of self-representation[J]. Cogn Ther Res, 1990, 14(2): 241-253. DOI: 10.1007/BF01176212.
MARKUS H, WURF E. The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 1987, 38: 299-337. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503.
ONORATO R S, TURNER J C. Fluidity in the self-concept: the shift from personal to social identity[J]. Eur J Soc Psychol, 2004, 34(3): 257-278. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.195.
王燕, 林镇超, 钱啸云. 建构中的自我概念: 形成及发展[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2015, 3(4): 23-32. DOI: 10.19563/j.cnki.sdjk.2015.04.013.
WANG Y, LIN Z C, QIAN X Y. The self-concept from theperspective of constructivism: formation and development[J]. J Soochow Univ Educ Sci Ed, 2015, 3(4): 23-32. DOI: 10.19563/j.cnki.sdjk.2015.04.013.
POMERANCE M H, CONVERSE P D. Investigating context specificity, self-Schema characteristics, and personality test validity[J]. Pers Individ Differ, 2014, 58: 54-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.005.
POMERANCE M H, CONVERSE P D, MOON N A. Self-concept content and structure: motivation and performance implications[J]. Pers Rev, 2021, 50(6): 1514-1529. DOI: 10.1108/pr-07-2019-0403.
崔红, 王登峰. 中国人人格形容词评定量表(QZPAS)的信度、效度与常模[J]. 心理科学, 2004, 27(1): 185-188. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2004.01.055.
CUI H, WANG D F. Reliability, validation, and norm for the Chinese personality adjective rating scale (QZPAS)[J]. Psychol Sci, 2004, 27(1): 185-188. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2004.01.055.
FISKE S T, CUDDY A J C, GLICK P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence[J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2007, 11(2): 77-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.
程婕婷, 张斌, 汪新建. 道德: 刻板印象内容的新维度[J]. 心理学探新, 2015, 35(5): 442-447. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2015.05.010.
CHENG J T, ZHANG B, WANG X J. Morality: a new dimension of stereotype content[J]. Psychol Explor, 2015, 35(5): 442-447. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2015.05.010.
李琼, 郭德俊. 中国人的印象整饰特征及其影响因素初探[J]. 心理科学, 1999, 22(6): 488-491, 573. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.1999.06.003.
LI Q, GUO D J. The self-presentational features of the Chinese and their influential factors[J]. Psychol Sci, 1999, 22(6): 488-491, 573. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.1999.06.003.
戴晓阳, 曹亦薇. 心理评定量表的编制和修订中存在的一些问题[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 562-565.
DAI X Y, CAO Y W. Some defects in development and revision of psychological rating scales[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(5): 562-565.
罗杰, 戴晓阳. "大五"人格测验在我国使用情况的元分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(6): 740-742, 752. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2011.06.008.
LUO J, DAI X Y. Meta-analysis of big-five factor personality tests in China[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2011, 19(6): 740-742, 752. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2011.06.008.
陈红, 冯文锋, 黄希庭. 青少年理想身体自我量表编制[J]. 心理科学, 2006, 29(5): 1190-1193. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2006.05.041.
CHEN H, FENG W F, HUANG X T. The development of adolescents' ideal physical self scale[J]. Psychol Sci, 2006, 29(5): 1190-1193. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2006.05.041.
郭成, 赵小云, 张大均. 青少年一般学业自我量表的编制[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(12): 155-161. DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2011.12.021.
GUO C, ZHAO X Y, ZHANG D J. The compiling of adolescent students' general academic self-concept[J]. J Southwest Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2011, 33(12): 155-161. DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2011.12.021.
罗杰, 戴晓阳. 中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅰ: 理论框架与测验信度[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(3): 381-385. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.03.001.
LUO J, DAI X Y. Development of the Chinese adjectives scale of big-five factor personality Ⅰ: theoretical framework and assessment reliability[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2015, 23(3): 381-385. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.03.001.
STREINER D L. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis[J]. Can J Psychiatry, 1994, 39(3): 135-140. DOI: 10.1177/070674379403900303.
罗杰, 戴晓阳. 中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅱ: 测验效度[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(4): 571-575. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.04.001.
LUO J, DAI X Y. Development of the Chinese adjectives scale of big-five factor personality Ⅱ: assessment validity[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2015, 23(4): 571-575. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.04.001.
WALLACE G R, SPANER S D, FILER P S. Factorial comparison of the Wallace self-concept scale between special education teachers and regular classroom teachers[J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 1984, 44(2): 199-207. DOI: 10.1177/0013164484442003.
温涵, 梁韵斯. 结构方程模型常用拟合指数检验的实质[J]. 心理科学, 2015, 38(4): 987-994. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2015.04.031.
WEN H, LIANG Y S. The essence of testing structural equation models using popular fit indexes[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2015, 38(4): 987-994. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2015.04.031.
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. 结构方程模型检验: 拟合指数与卡方准则[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(2): 186-194.
WEN Z L, HOU J T, MARSH H W. Structural equation model testing: cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and Chi-square test[J]. Acta Psychol Sin, 2004, 36(2): 186-194.
LEE H, AHN J K, KWON J H. Effects of self-image on anxiety, judgement bias and emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder[J]. Behav Cogn Psychother, 2019, 47(1): 81-94. DOI: 10.1017/s135246581800022x.
黄希庭, 陈传锋, 余华. 老年人自我概念与心理健康水平的相关研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1998, 6(4): 222-225.
HUANG X T, CHEN C F, YU H. Research on the correlation between the self-concept and mental health in the elderly[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 1998, 6(4): 222-225.
樊富珉, 付吉元. 大学生自我概念与心理健康的相关研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2001, 15(2): 76-77. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2001.02.002.
FAN F M, FU J Y. Self-concept and mental health of college students[J]. Chin Ment Heal J, 2001, 15(2): 76-77. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2001.02.002.
MASON T B, SMITH K E, ENGWALL A, et al . Self-discrepancy theory as a transdiagnostic framework: a meta-analysis of self-discrepancy and psychopathology[J ] . Psychol Bull, 2019, 145(4): 372-389. DOI:10.1037/bul0000186.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
