Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application

Xingya LIAO; Hui JIANG; Mengxue ZHAO; Xiaoling ZHANG; Yuanyuan LI; Ke XIONG; Shujuan SUN; Zhengzhi FENG

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application

Monographic Reports: Enhancement of soldier's psychological efficacy | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application
- Journal of Army Medical University Vol. 44, Issue 19, Pages: 1954-1960(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系
  2.510000 广州，31626部队
  3.266000 山东青岛，91951部队卫生队
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092
  CLC： B841.7;R395.1;R821.2
- Received：18 February 2022，
  
  Revised：2022-04-21，
  
  Published：15 October 2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Xingya LIAO, Hui JIANG, Mengxue ZHAO, et al. Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(19): 1954-1960.
DOI：

Xingya LIAO, Hui JIANG, Mengxue ZHAO, et al. Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(19): 1954-1960. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092.

摘要

目的

检验反刍思维量表在中国军人群体中的信效度。

方法

采用反刍思维量表、患者健康问卷抑郁量表、负性认知加工偏向量表对2个旅级单位4 443名军人进行施测，用SPSS 22.0与AMOS 26.0软件进行信效度分析。

结果

① 验证性因素分析显示一阶三因子模型的结构方程拟合度良好(RMSEA=0.074

GFI=0.887

RMR=0.018

CFI=0.922

IFI=0.922)；②反刍思维量表各条目与各因子、量表总分之间呈显著正相关(

=0.372~0.977，

0.01)，内容效度良好；③量表总分及各因子与抑郁症筛查量表的相关系数在0.604~0.730，与负性认知加工偏向量表的相关系数在0.615~0.741，效标关联效度良好；④反刍思维量表及其因子的克伦巴赫α系数在0.821~0.956，分半系数在0.845~0.918，重测系数在0.671~0.894，信度良好。

结论

反刍思维量表在中国军人群体中具有良好的信效度。

Abstract

Objective

To test the reliability and validity of the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) in Chinese military personnel.

Methods

A total of 4 443 military personnel from 2 brigades in the Northern Theater Command were tested using Ruminative Responses scale(RRS)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

and Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire (NCPBQ). SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 26.0 were used for reliability and validity analysis.

Results

① The 3-dimension model fitting indexes of RRS were within the standard range (RMSEA=0.074

GFI=0.887

RMR=0.018

CFI=0.922

IFI=0.922). ② All the scores for each item and factor of RRS showed significant positive correlations with the total score of the questionnaire (

=0.372~0.977

0.01). ③ The correlation coefficients between each factor of RRS and PHQ-9 were 0.604~0.730

and those between each factor of RRS and NCPBQ were 0.615~0.741. ④ It was found that the Cronbach'α coefficients of the RRS were between 0.821 and 0.956

the split-half coefficients were between 0.845 and 0.918

the test-retest coefficients were between 0.671 and 0.894.

Conclusion

RRS is of high reliability and validity for measurement among military personnel.

关键词

Keywords

references

NOLEN-HOEKSEMA S. Sex differences in unipolar depression: evidence and theory[J]. Psychol Bull, 1987, 101(2): 259-282.

WHISMAN M A, MIRANDA R, FRESCO D M, et al . Measurement invariance of the ruminative res ponses scale across gender[J ] . Assessment, 2020, 27(3): 508-517. DOI: 10.1177/1073191118774131.

LUCENA-SANTOS P, PINTO-GOUVEIA J, CARVALHO S A, et al . Is the widely used two-factor structure of the Ruminative Responses Scale invariant across different samples of women?[J ] . Psychol Psychother, 2018, 91(3): 398-416. DOI: 10.1111/papt.12168.

LEE S, KIM W. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the revised Korean version of ruminative response scale[J]. Psychiatry Investig, 2014, 11(1): 59-64. DOI: 10.4306/pi.2014.11.1.59.

HASEGAWA A, KODA M, HATTORI Y, et al . Longitudinal predictions of the Brooding and Reflection subscales of the Japanese Ruminative Responses Scale for depression[J ] . Psychol Rep, 2013, 113(2): 566-585. DOI: 10.2466/02.15.PR0.113x24z5.

NOLEN-HOEKSEMA S, MORROW J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1991, 61(1): 115-121. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.115.

HVENEGAARD M, WATKINS E R, POULSEN S, et al . Rumination-focused cognitive behav iour therapy vs. cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial[J ] . Trials, 2015, 16: 344. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0875-y.

FIGUEROA C A, DEJONG H, MOCKING RJ T, et al . Attentional control, rumination and recurrence of depression[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2019, 256: 364-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.072.

游志麒, 徐钰, 张陆, 等. 自我控制对睡眠质量的影响: 反刍思维与就寝拖延的中介作用[J]. 应用心理学, 2020, 26(1): 74-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2020.01.008.

YOU Z Q, XU Y, ZHANG L, et al . The predictive effect of self-control on sleep quality: the mediating role of rumination and bedtime procrastination[J ] . Chin J Appl Psychol, 2020, 26(1): 74-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2020.01.008.

刘慧瀛, 王婉. 大学生负性生活事件与状态焦虑的关系: 反刍思维的中介效应和自我肯定的调节效应[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2017, 31(9): 728-733. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.09.012.

LIU H Y, WANG W. Relationship between negative life events and state-anxiety: Mediating role of rumination and moderating role of self-affirmation[J]. Chin Ment Heal J, 2017, 31(9): 728-733. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.09.012.

MATHES B M, KENNEDY G A, MORABITO D M, et al . A longitudinal investigation of the association between rumination, hostility, and PTSD symptoms among trauma-exposed individuals[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2020, 277: 322-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.029.

侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 等. 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01548.

HOU L L, JIANG Q, WANG H Z, et al . The relationship between trait anger and aggressive behavior: based on the perspective of the integrative cognitive model[J ] . Acta Psychol Sin, 2017, 49(12): 1548-1558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01548.

ROBERTS J E, GILBOA E, GOTLIB I. Ruminative response style and vulnerability to episodes of Dysphoria: gender, neuroticism, and episode duration[J]. Cogn Ther Res, 1998, 22: 401-423. DOI: 10.1023/A%3A1018713313894.

WENDY T, RICHARD G, SUSAN N. Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis[J]. Cogn Ther Res, 2003, 27(3): 247-259. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023910315561.

韩秀, 杨宏飞. Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 550-551, 549.

HAN X, YANG H F. Chinese version of Nolen-Hoeksema ruminative responses scale(RRS) used in 912 college students: reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(5): 550-551, 549.

杨娟, 凌宇, 肖晶, 等. 沉思反应量表中文版在高中生中初步运用结果分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(1): 27-28, 31.

YANG J, LING Y, XIAO J, et al . The Chinese version of ruminative responses scale in high school students: its reliability and validity[J ] . Chin J Clin Psychol, 2009, 17(1): 27-28, 31.

戴琴, 冯正直, 许爽, 等. 沉思反应问卷中文版在大学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2015, 23(5): 753-758. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2015.05.031.

DAI Q, FENG Z Z, XU S, et al . The reliability and validity of the Chinese version ruminative response scale(RRS) in undergraduates[J ] . China J Heal Psychol, 2015, 23(5): 753-758. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2015.05.031.

QIU W F, MA J P, XIE Z Y, et al . Online risky behavior and sleep quality among Chinese college students: the chain mediating role of rumination and anxiety[J ] . Curr Psychol, 2022: 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02641-3.

DU PONT A, RHEE S H, CORLEY R P, et al . Rumination and executive functions: understanding cognitive vulnerability for psychopathology[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2019, 256: 550-559. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.026.

SATYSHUR M D, LAYDEN E A, GOWINS J R, et al . Functional connectivity of reflective and brooding rumination in depressed and healthy women[J ] . Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 2018, 18(5): 884-901. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0611-7.

SHIN K M, CHO S M, KIM K H. A validation study of the Korean-ruminative response scale in Korean adolescents[J]. Psychiatry Investig, 2015, 12(4): 508-515. DOI: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.4.508.

KROENKE K, SPITZER R L, WILLIAMS J B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2001, 16(9): 606-613. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

孙晓艳, 李怡雪, 余灿清, 等. 中文版抑郁量表信效度研究的系统综述[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2017, 38(1): 110-116. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.01.021.

SUN X Y, LI Y X, YU C Q, et al . Reliability and validity of depression scales of Chinese version: a systematic review[J ] . Chin J Epidemiol, 2017, 38(1): 110-116. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.01.021.

张睿. 负性认知加工偏向问卷的编制与应用[D]. 重庆: 第三军医大学, 2015.

ZHANG R. The compilation and application of negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire[D]. Chongqing: Third Military Medical University, 2015.

闫晓钒, 张睿, 冯正直. 负性认知加工偏向问卷的研制[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.

YAN X F, ZHANG R, FENG Z Z. Development of negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.

闫晓钒, 冯正直. 负性认知加工偏向问卷在军人群体中的信效度评价[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075.

YAN X F, FENG Z Z. Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075.

PADILLA PAREDES P, CALVETE ZUMALDE E. A test of the vulnerability-stress model with brooding and reflection to explain depressive symptoms in adolescence[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2015, 44(4): 860-869. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-014-0148-1.

JOSE P E, BROWN I. When does the gender difference in rumination begin? gender and age differences in the use of rumination by adolescents[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2008, 37(2): 180-192. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-006-9166-y.

刘旺, 田丽丽, 陆红. 反刍思维反应量表在中国职业女性群体的初步运用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.01.009.

LIU W, TIAN L L, LU H. Preliminary application of the rumination response scale(RRS) to Chinese working women[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2013, 21(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.01.009.

JOHNSON D P, WHISMAN M A, CORLEY R P, et al . Genetic and environmental influences on rumination and its covariation with depression[J ] . Cogn Emot, 2014, 28(7): 1270-1286. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.881325.

KOVÁCS L N, KOCSEL N, GALAMBOS A, et al . Validating the bifactor structure of the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire-A psychometric study[J ] . PLoS One, 2021, 16(7): e0254986. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254986.

冯正直, 胡丰, 刘云波, 等. 我国军人症状自评量表2016版常模的建立[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2016, 38(20): 2210-2214. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201607007.

FENG Z Z, HU F, LIU Y B, et al . Establishment of norm of Symptom Check List 90(2016 Edition) for Chinese military personnel[J ] . J Third Mil Med Univ, 2016, 38(20): 2210-2214. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201607007.

张理义, 梅贵森, 任忠文, 等. 不同文化程度军人心身健康水平及其影响因素调查与分析[J]. 人民军医, 2012, 55(11): 1034-1035, 1042.

ZHANG L Y, MEI G S, REN Z W, et al . Investigation and analysis of mental and physical health level and its influencing factors of soldiers with different education levels[J ] . People Mil Surg, 2012, 55(11): 1034-1035, 1042.

张婕, 段芸杉, 杨解玲. 军人心理健康现状调查与干预对策[J]. 教育现代化, 2020, 7(14): 161-164. DOI: 10.16541/j.cnki.2095-8420.2020.14.052.

ZHANG J, DUAN Y S, YANG J L. Investigation on the status of mental health of soldiers personnel and the intervention strategies[J]. Educ Mod, 2020, 7(14): 161-164. DOI: 10.16541/j.cnki.2095-8420.2020.14.052.

罗显荣, 王真真, 张红梅, 等. 南战区军人心理状况的多维度多因素分析[J]. 空军医学杂志, 2013, 29(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2811.2013.01.008.

LUO X R, WANG Z Z, ZHANG H M, et al . Multi-dimensional and multiple factors analysis of psychological status of military personnel in south war-zone[J ] . Med J Air Force, 2013, 29(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2811.2013.01.008.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Comprehensive mental health assessment for soldiers and gender differences based on network analysis

亲子疏离问卷在军人群体中的修订、信效度检验和常模初步构建

Thinking on drinking water and sanitation in army under the impact of reverse osmosis technology

Compilation and reliability & validity analysis of Mental Health Ability Questionnaire for Army-men

Related Author

ZHANG Qiongyue

YANG Yanzhen

PENG Li

XU Chen

YANG Qian

LI Min

TAN Jieying

SUN Xiaoxiao

Related Institution

Department of Nephrology，Amy Medical Center of PLA/Daping Hospital of Third Military Medical University

Department of Military Psychology， Faculty of Medical Psychology， Army Medical University （Third Military Medical University）

Department of Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Military Preventive Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University)

Department of Behavior Medicine, Army Military Medical University(Third Military Medical University)

⁰