Comparison of laparoscopic single-site surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer

Yuan DENG; Li DENG; Yuanyang YAO; Shuai TANG; Wenwei TAN; Kuiyan ZHONG; Yanzhou WANG

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202112221

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison of laparoscopic single-site surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer

Clinical Medicine | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- Comparison of laparoscopic single-site surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer
- Journal of Army Medical University Vol. 44, Issue 8, Pages: 818-823(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院妇产科
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  the Clinical Medical Talent Training Program of Army Medical University(2018XLC3002);the Appropriate Health Technology Promotion Project of Chongqing(2021jstg010)
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202112221
  CLC： R730.56;R737.33
- Received：24 December 2021，
  
  Revised：2022-01-25，
  
  Published：30 April 2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Yuan DENG, Li DENG, Yuanyang YAO, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic single-site surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(8): 818-823.
DOI：

Yuan DENG, Li DENG, Yuanyang YAO, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic single-site surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(8): 818-823. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202112221.

摘要

目的

对比分析单孔腹腔镜(laparoendoscopic single-site surgery，LESS)和多孔腹腔镜(traditional laparoscopic surgery，TLS)在子宫内膜癌全面分期手术中的围手术期结局，验证其安全性、可行性及有效性。

方法

回顾性收集2018年8月至2020年8月于陆军军医大学第一附属医院妇产科行腹腔镜下内膜癌全面分期手术的535例患者临床资料，其中26例患者行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术，509例行传统多孔腹腔镜手术，进行1∶2倾向评分匹配，以最小化两组间因基线特征不平衡而产生的偏差，最终获得单孔组26例，多孔组52例。比较2组的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结切除数目、术后排气时间、留置引流时间、住院时间、术后疼痛评分、切口满意度评分及术中术后并发症发生情况。

结果

2组手术均顺利完成，无中转开腹。2组的术中出血量、淋巴结切除数目、术后排气时间、留置引流时间、住院时间及术中术后并发症发生率比较差异均无统计学意义。单孔组比多孔组手术时间长[(197.3±55.7)min

(164.7±62.7)min

]

，术后疼痛评分低，术后切口满意度评分高[(5.73±0.53)

(5.17±0.71)

]

，差异均有统计学意义(

＜0.05)。

结论

与传统腹腔镜相比，单孔腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜癌安全可行，具有术后疼痛轻、美容效果好等优点。

Abstract

Objective

To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus traditional laparoscopic surgery (TLS) in the staging surgery of endometrial cancer

and to verify its safety

feasibility and effectiveness.

Methods

A total of 535 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and undergoing laparoscopic total staging surgery from August 2018 to August 2020 in our department were retrospectively recruited in this study. Among them

26 patients underwent LESS

and 509 received TLS.A 1∶2 propensity score matching was performed to minimize the bias due to the imbalanced baseline features between the 2 groups. Finally

26 cases in LESS group and 52 cases in TLS group were obtained. The operation time

volume of intraoperative blood loss

number of lymph nodes removed

time of postoperative exhaust

time of postoperative indwelling drainage

postoperative hospital stay

pain score of 24-hour after surgery and satisfactory with cosmetic results were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The operations in both groups were successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy. There were no statistical differences in the volume of intraoperative blood loss

number of lymph nodes removed

time of postoperative exhaust

time of postoperative indwelling drainage

and postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups. Meanwhile

the LESS group has significantly longer operation time (197.3±55.7

164.7±62.7 min)

a lower pain score of 24-hour after surgery and a

more satisfactory postoperative cosmetic effect (5.73±0.53

5.17±0.71) when compared with the TLS group (

0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with TLS

LESS is safe and feasible for endometrial cancer

with advantages of less pain and good cosmetic effectiveness.

关键词

Keywords

references

MURALI R, SOSLOW R A, WEIGELT B. Classification of endometrial carcinoma: more than two types[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7): e268-e278. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70591-6.

BROOKS R A, FLEMING G F, LASTRA R R, et al . Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer[J ] . CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69(4): 258-279. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21561.

RAGLAN O, KALLIALA I, MARKOZANNES G, et al . Risk factors for endometrial cancer: an umbrella review of the literature[J ] . Int J Cancer, 2019, 145(7): 1719-1730. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31961.

RABINOVICH A. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive review[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 291(4): 721-727. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3517-9.

GALAAL K, DONKERS H, BRYANT A, et al . Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the man agement of early stage endometrial cancer[J ] . Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 10(10): CD006655. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub3.

吴治敏, 王卉, 李玲, 等. 单孔与传统腹腔镜下行宫颈癌根治手术患者围手术期对比研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018, 40(16): 1507-1511. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201802109.

WU Z M, WANG H, LI L, et al . Perioperative outcomes of patients receiving single-site versus multi-site laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J ] . J Third Mil Med Univ, 2018, 40(16): 1507-1511. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201802109.

DEMIRAYAK G, COMBA C, ÖZDEMIR I A. Laparoendoscopic single-site sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(5): 776. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.035.

蔡志福, 李力. 单孔腹腔镜技术与快速康复在子宫内膜癌手术中的应用研究[J]. 妇产与遗传(电子版), 2021, 11(3): 46-52. DOI: 10.3868/j.issn.2095-1558.2021.03.010.

CAI Z F, LI L. Application of single-port laparoscopic technique and rapid rehabilitation in endometrial cancer surgery[J]. Obstet Gynecol Genet Electron Ed, 2021, 11(3): 46-52. DOI: 10.3868/j.issn.2095-1558.2021.03.010.

邓媛, 姚远洋, 王延洲. 单孔腹腔镜技术在子宫内膜癌治疗中的应用[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2020, 13(8): 759-762. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2020.08.04.

DENG Y, YAO Y Y, WANG Y Z. Application of single-port laparoscopic technique in treatment of endometrial cancer[J]. Chin J New Clin Med, 2020, 13(8): 759-762. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2020.08.04.

TOGAMI S, KAWAMURA T, YANAZUME S, et al . Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer[J ] . Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2020, 50(11): 1261-1264. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa116.

CHAMBERS L M, CARR C, FREEMAN L, et al . Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery[J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221(3): 243.e1-243243.e11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.038.

王延洲, 姚远洋, 李宇迪, 等. 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌的可行性和安全性分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(6): 335-338. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.06.006.

WANG Y Z, YAO Y Y, LI Y D, et al . Natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: feasibility and safety analysis[J ] . Chin J Laparosc Surg Electron Ed, 2018, 11(6): 335-338. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.06.006.

WANG Y Z, DENG L, TANG S, et al . vNOTES hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: description of technique and perioperative outcomes[J ] . J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(6): 1254-1261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.022.

FADER A N, ESCOBAR P F. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2009, 114(2): 157-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.020.

FAGOTTI A, BORUTA D M Ⅱ, SCAMBIA G, et al . First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated withlaparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study[J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 206(4): 353.e1-353.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.031.

PARK J Y, KIM D Y, SUH D S, et al . Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgical staging for early-stage endometrial cancer[J ] . Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2014, 24(2): 358-363. DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000 000000046.

MOULTON L, JERNIGAN A M, CARR C, et al . Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a singleinstitution[J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(5): 610.e1-610610.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.008.

王延洲, 陈诚, 徐嘉莉, 等. "筷子法"单孔腹腔镜技术在宫颈癌中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(1): 28-31. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674- 6899.2018.01.008.

WANG Y Z, CHEN C, XU J L, et al . The application of & quot; "chopsticks technique & quot"; single-site laparoscopic surgery technology in cervical cancer[J ] . Chin J Laparosc Surg Electron Ed, 2018, 11(1): 28-31. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.01.008.

ROSSITTO C, CIANCI S, GUELI ALLETTI S, et al . Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery[J ] . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017, 216: 125-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026.

TUOHETI Z, HAN L L, MULATI G. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J ] . Medicine, 2021, 100(12): e24908. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024908.

BARNES H, SPENCER R, UPPAL S, et al . The adoption of single-port laparoscopic full staging for endometrial cancer: safety, learning curve and surgical outcome[J ] . J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(6): S49-S50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.136.

BOGLIOLO S, CASSANI C, MUSACCHI V, et al . Robotic single-site surgery in management of obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer[J ] . J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(4): 697-699. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig. 2015.01.031.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Roles of cysteine rich protein 1 in proliferation, invasion, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of endometrial cancer cells

Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion evaluated by immunohistochemistry and stratification with a semi-quantitative scoring system for early-stage endometrial cancer

Construction of survival prediction model for metastatic advanced endometrial cancer based on the SEER database

Related Author

Xiaoshuang WU

Meifeng LI

Xinling LYU

Wei JIA

Jianming HU

Xiaobin CUI

Caipu CHUN

Qian HU

Related Institution

Department of Pathology, Fourth Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shihezi University, Aksu, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

Department of Pathology, First Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

Department of Pathology, Kuitun Hospital of Ili Prefecture, Kuitun, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

Department of Breast Oncology, the Affiliated Foshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Foshan Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

⁰