the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing(cstc2020jcyj-zdxmX0027);the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of China(81603164)
Jingyi LIU, Lun CAI, Hao DUAN, et al. Inhibitory effect of emodin on MRSA biofilm and its mechanism[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(7): 684-690.
DOI:
Jingyi LIU, Lun CAI, Hao DUAN, et al. Inhibitory effect of emodin on MRSA biofilm and its mechanism[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(7): 684-690. DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202112068.
Inhibitory effect of emodin on MRSA biofilm and its mechanism
To investigate anti-biofilm activity and mechanisms of emodin against methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA)
in vitro
.
Methods
2
Microbroth dilution was explored to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of emodin against MRSA252 strain and clinical isolations. Inhibitory curve were draw to estimate dynamic bacteriostatic effect. Crystal violet staining was used to investigate the inhibitory effect of emodin against MRSA biofilm. The effect of emodin on the morphology of MRSA biofilm was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). The expression of intercellular adhesion (ica) operon was detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR.
Results
2
The MICs of emodin against different strains of MRSA ranged from 2 to 8 μg/mL
while MBCs were from 4 to 16 μg/mL. Emodin obviously inhibited the formation of biofilm in a dose-dependent manner. Besides
it destroyed biofilm structure and increased the ratio of dead bacteria under biofilm. Fluorescence quantitative PCR showed that emodin significantly down-regulated the expression of ica operon.
Conclusion
2
Emodin can inhibit MRSA biofilm
in vitro
and may restrain the formation of bacterial biofilm by down-regulating the expression of ica operon.
关键词
Keywords
references
MCGUINNESS W A, MALACHOWA N, DELEO F R. Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus [J ] . Yale J Biol Med, 2017, 90(2): 269-281.
CHAMBERS H F. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 1988, 1(2): 173-186. DOI:10.1128/cmr.1.2.173.
SCHITO G C. The importance of the development of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus [J ] . Clin Microbiol Infect, 2006, 12(Suppl 1): 3-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01343.x.
SCHAEFLER S, JONES D, PERRY W, et al . Emergence of gentamicin- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in New York City hospitals[J ] . J Clin Microbiol, 1981, 13(4): 754-759. DOI:10.1128/jcm.13.4.754-759.1981..
HAN L L, MCDOUGAL L K, GORWITZ R J, et al . High frequencies of clindamycin and tetracycline resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pulsed-field type USA300 isolates collected at a Boston ambulatory health center[J ] . J Clin Microbiol, 2007, 45(4): 1350-1352. DOI:10.1128/JCM.02274-06..
Controlprevention C F D. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin—United States, 2002. [J ] . MMWR Morb Mortal Week Rep, 2002, 51. (26);565-567
KALI A. Antibiotics and bioactive natural products in treatment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus : a brief review[J ] . Pharmacogn Rev, 2015, 9(17): 29-34. DOI:10.4103/0973-7847.156329.
BRIDIER A, BRIANDET R, THOMAS V, et al . Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a review[J ] . Biofouling, 2011, 27(9): 1017-1032. DOI:10.1080/08927014.2011.626899.
PERCIVAL S, KNOTTENBELT D, COCHRANE C. Biofilms and veterinary medicine[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-21289-5.
EHRLICH G D, AHMED A, EARL J, et al . The distributed genome hypothesis as a rubric for understanding evolution in situ during chronic bacterial biofilm infectious processes[J ] . FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 2010, 59(3): 269-279. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00704.x.
DENG Z X, YIN J H, WANG H F. Progress in research on quorum sensing and intestinal biofilm formation of Lactobacillus [J ] . Acta Microbiol Sin, 2018, 58(11): 1970-1978. DOI:10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20180147.
TIAN K, ZHANG H G, CHEN X G, et al . Determination of five anthraquinones in medicinal plants by capillary zone el ectrophoresis with β-cyclodextrin addition[J ] . J Chromatogr A, 2006, 1123(1): 134-137. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.04.021.
LI M, DU Z M. Research progress on pharmacological effects of aloe-emodin[J]. Chin J Clin Pharmacol, 2015, 31(9): 765-768. DOI:10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2015.09.027,
CHEN Y Y, TANG Y P, CHEN J Q, et al . Research progress and utilization strategy on resource chemistry of Rhei Radix et Rhizoma[J ] . Chin Tradit Herb Drugs, 2018, 49(21): 5170-5178.
LIU J, WANG L. Research progress on emodin[J]. China Pharmacy. 2014, 25(35): 3351-3354. DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2014.35.28.
YAN X, GU S S, SHI Y J, et al . The effect of emodin on Staphylococcus aureus strains in planktonic form and biofilm formation in vitro [J ] . Arch Microbiol, 2017, 199(9): 1267-1275. DOI:10.1007/s00203-017-13 96-8..
CASCIOFERRO S, CARBONE D, PARRINO B, et al . Therapeutic strategies to counteract antibiotic resistance in MRSA biofilm-associated infections[J ] . ChemMedChem, 2021, 16(1): 65-80. DOI:10.1002/cmdc.202000677.
LIU M, PENG W, QIN R X, et al . The direct anti-MRSA effect of emodin via damaging cell membrane[J ] . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2015, 99(18): 7699-7709. DOI:10.1007/s00253-015-6657-3..
YANG Y, LI H B, SUN H W, et al . A novel nitro-dexamethasone inhibits agr system activity and improves therapeutic effects in MRSA sepsis models without antibiotics[J ] . Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 20307. DOI:10.1038/srep20307.
PARAI D, BANERJEE M, DEY P, et al . Reserpine attenuates biofilm formation and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus [J ] . Microb Pathog, 2020, 138: 103790. DOI:10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103790..
MOOTZ J M, MALONE C L, SHAW L N, et al . Staphopains modulate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm integrity[J ] . Infect Immun, 2013, 81(9): 3227-3238. DOI:10.1128/IAI.00377-13..
BALAMURUGAN P, PRAVEEN KRISHNA V, BHARATH D, et al . Staphylococcus aureus quorum regulator SarA targeted compound, 2-[(methylamino)methyl ] phenol inhibits biofilm and down-regulates virulence genes[J ] . Front Microbiol, 2017, 8: 1290. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01290..
BISCHOFF M, ENTENZA J M, GIACHINO P. Influence of a functional sigB operon on the global regulators sar and agr in Staphylococcus aureus [J ] . J Bacteriol, 2001, 183(17): 5171-5179. DOI:10.1128/JB.183.17.5171-5179.2001.
SLATER R T, FROST L R, JOSSI S E, et al . Clostridioides difficile LuxS mediates inter-bacterial interactions within biofilms[J ] . Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 9903. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-46143-6.
LE K Y, OTTO M. Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci-an overview[J]. Front Microbiol, 2015, 6: 1174. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01174.
TURKEY A M, BARZANI K K, SULEIMAN A A J, et al . Molecular assessment of accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum sensing system in biofilm forming Staphylococcus aureus and study of the effect of silver nanoparticles on agr system[J ] . Iran J Microbiol, 2018, 10(1): 14-21..
MOORMEIER D E, BAYLES K W. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: a complex developmental organism[J ] . Mol Microbiol, 2017, 104(3): 365-376. DOI:10.1111/mmi.13634.