Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients: clinical report of 10 cases

Mengjun YANG; Chunyan DENG; Ling WEI; Nengrui YANG; Yang LIU; Zhiwen CHEN; Zhansong ZHOU; Jian ZHANG; Ji ZHENG

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202110172

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients: clinical report of 10 cases

Clinical Medicine | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients: clinical report of 10 cases
- Journal of Army Medical University Vol. 44, Issue 8, Pages: 824-828(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院泌尿外科研究所
  2.300300 天津，武警特色医学中心神经创伤修复研究所
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  the Clinical Major Technology Innovation Project of Army Medical University(CX2019LC107)
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202110172
  CLC： R616;R699.8;R737.27
- Received：28 October 2021，
  
  Revised：2022-01-22，
  
  Published：30 April 2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Mengjun YANG, Chunyan DENG, Ling WEI, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients: clinical report of 10 cases[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(8): 824-828.
DOI：

Mengjun YANG, Chunyan DENG, Ling WEI, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients: clinical report of 10 cases[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2022, 44(8): 824-828. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202110172.

摘要

目的

探讨顺行机器人辅助腹腔镜下阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的疗效及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2019年3月至2020年1月陆军军医大学第一附属医院泌尿外科收治的10例接受双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的阴茎癌患者的临床资料。10例患者术前病理证实为阴茎鳞状细胞癌，在全身麻醉下行机器人辅助腹腔镜下双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。

结果

10例阴茎癌患者均在全身麻醉下顺利完成双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术，术中均未中转开腹，手术时间为80~119(87.90±11.58)min；术中出血量为5~25(12.50±8.90)mL；清除淋巴结数量为10~35(22.90±8.90)枚，阳性淋巴结(1例T2期6枚，1例T2期3枚，1例T1期3枚，1例T1期2枚)；术后住院时间为2~5(2.80±1.23)d；引流管留置时间为7~27(17.10±3.63)d。患者均未发生皮肤坏死、出血、淋巴瘘、感染等并发症。术后随访时间为14~24(16.40±6.79)个月。1例发生复发转移，其余9例未发生复发和转移。

结论

机器人辅助腹腔镜下双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术为一种安全有效的阴茎癌临床方法，能减少并发症，促进患者术后快速恢复。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymph node dissection for patients with penile cancer.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on clinical data from 10 patients with penile cancer admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from March 2019 to January 2020. All of them were diagnosed with penis squamous cell carcinoma by pathological diagnosis. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed for all patients under general anesthesia.

Results

The surgery was successfully accomplished at totally 20 sides without intraoperative conversion to open surgery. The operation time was 87.90±11.58 (80~119) min

intraoperative blood loss was 12.50±8.90 (5~25) mL

and number of removed lymph nodes was 22.90±8.90 (10~35). The positive lymph nodes were 6 in 1 case at T2 stage

3 in 1 case at T2 stage

3 in 1 case at T1 stage and 2 in 1 case at T1 stage. The postoperative hospital stay was 2.80±1.23 (2~5) d

and the indwelling time of drainage tube was 17.10±3.63 (7~27) d. None of the patients experienced skin necrosis

bleeding

lymphatic fistula

infection and other complications. During the follow-up time of 16.40±6.79 (14~24) months

recurrence and metastasis were found in only 1 case

and not in the other 9 cases.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy is a safe and effective dissection for penile cancer

which can reduce complications and promote rapid recovery after surgery.

关键词

Keywords

references

SCHOFFER O, NEUMANN A, STABENOW R, et al . Penile cancer—Incidence, mortality, and survival in Saxony, Germany[J ] . Urol Oncol, 2019, 37(4): 295.e1-295.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.003.

PANG C, GUAN Y Y, LI H B, et al . Urologic cancer in China[J ] . Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2016, 46(6): 497-501. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyw034.

HAKENBERG O W, DRÄGER D L, ERBERSDOBLER A, et al . The diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer[J ] . Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2018, 115(39): 646-652. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0646.

MARCHIONI M, BERARDINELLI F, DE NUNZIO C, et al . New insight in penile cancer[J ] . Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2018, 70(6): 559-569. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03215-0.

ERCOLE C E, POW-SANG J M, SPIESS P E. Update in the surgical principles and therapeutic outcomes of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer[J]. Urol Oncol, 2013, 31(5): 505-516. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.02.020.

PROTZEL C, ALCARAZ A, HORENBLAS S, et al . Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer[J ] . Eur Urol, 2009, 55(5): 1075-1088. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.021.

GKEGKES I D, MINIS E E, IAVAZZO C. Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review[J]. J Robot Surg, 2019, 13(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0823-4.

DILLNER J, VON KROGH G, HORENBLAS S, et al . Etiology of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis[J ] . Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl, 2000(205): 189-193. DOI: 10.1080/00365590050509913.

HORENBLAS S. Lymphadenectomy in penile cancer[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2011, 38(4): 459-469, vi-vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2011.07.004.

PANDEY D, MAHAJAN V, KANNAN R R. Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2006, 93(2): 133-138. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20414.

GASTRICH M D, BARONE J, BAC HMANN G, et al . Robotic surgery: review of the latest advances, risks, and outcomes[J ] . J Robot Surg, 2011, 5(2): 79-97. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0246-y.

JOSEPHSON D Y, JACOBSOHN K M, LINK B A, et al . Robotic-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy[J ] . Urology, 2009, 73(1): 167-170;discussion170-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.060.

SÁNCHEZ A, SOTELO R, RODRIGUEZ O, et al . Robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma[J ] . J Robot Surg, 2016, 10(4): 369-372. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0599-3.

马佳佳, 陈必良. 达芬奇机器人腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗外阴癌的临床效果与手术策略[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 7(3): 172-176. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2014.03.003.

MA J J, CHEN B L. Clinical effect and operation strategy on inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulvar carcinoma by using Da Vinci robotic surgical system[J]. Chin J Laparosc Surg Electron Ed, 2014, 7(3):172-176. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2014.03.003.

郁华亮, 卢永良, 肖毅, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的临床研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39(1): 38-41. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.01.009.

YU H L, LU Y L, XIAO Y, et al . A clinical study on robotic assisted laparoscopic antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy[J ] . Chin J Urol, 2018, 39(1): 38-41. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.01.009.

GKEGKES I D, MINIS EE, IAVAZZO C. Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review[J]. J Robot Surg, 2019, 13(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0823-4.

FAVORITO L A. The future of inguinallymphadenecotmy in penile cancer: laparoscopic or robotic?[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2019, 45(2): 208-209. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.02.01.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Penile cancer in AIDS patients: clinical analysis of 24 cases

Related Author

颜志坚

白培明

Bahaa Toma

Related Institution

No data

⁰