610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院机器人微创中心
Received:09 June 2021,
Revised:2021-08-18,
Published:15 December 2021
移动端阅览
Shida FAN, Shangqing REN, Qian LYU, et al. Efficacy of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: an analysis of 54 cases[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(23): 2519-2524.
Shida FAN, Shangqing REN, Qian LYU, et al. Efficacy of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: an analysis of 54 cases[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2021, 43(23): 2519-2524. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202106074.
目的
2
对比分析机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy,RARC)中采用体内尿流改道术(intracorporeal urinary diversion,ICUD)与体外尿流改道术(extracorporeal urinary diversion,ECUD)的临床疗效。
方法
2
回顾性分析四川省人民医院2019年1月至2020年6月因诊断为肌层浸润性膀胱癌(muscle invasive bladder cancer,MIBC)并接受RARC患者的资料。根据术中采取不同尿流改道方式分为两组,A组采用完全体内尿流改道方式,共18例;B组采用体外尿流改道方式,共36例。对比分析两组的手术时间、出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、术后肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、术后拔除血浆引流管时间、术后并发症发生率、术后尿控率等。
结果
2
54例患者手术均成功,无1例中转开放。A组手术时间为270(240~320)min,明显短于B组[330(295~380) min
P
<
0.05
]
;两组术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05);两组术后肠道功能恢复时间、住院时间、拔除血浆引流管时间及术后尿控率差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。术后行尿道膀胱造影提示两组新膀胱位置正常,容量接近正常膀胱容量,且未见明显输尿管反流。术后并发症:B组有2例术后出现急性肠梗阻并发肠道缺血坏死,1例出现不全性肠梗阻,1例出现肺部感染;A组有1例出现不全性肠梗阻,2例出现泌尿系感染;经相应治疗后均治愈。
结论
2
行RARC的患者采用完全体内尿流改道和体外尿流改道都能获得较好的临床疗效,完全体内尿流改道手术时间更短,更能体现机器人辅助技术的优势。
Objective
2
To compare the clinical efficacy of intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC).
Methods
2
A retrospective analysis was carried out on the patients who were diagnosed with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and received RARC in our hospital from January 2019 to June 2020. According to the different urinary diversion adopted during the operation
they were divided into complete internal urinary diversion (ICUD group
n
=18) and external urinary diversion (ECUD group
n
=36). The operation time
blood loss amount
number of dissected lymph nodes
time of postoperative intestinal function recovery
length of postoperative hospital stay
time of removing plasma drainage tube
incidence of postoperative complications and rate of postoperative urinary control were compared between the 2 groups.
Results
2
RARC surgery successfully performed in all the 54 cases
and none of them were transferred to open surgery. The operation time of ICUD group was 270 (240~320) min
which was significantly shorter than that of ECUD group [330 (295~380) min
P
<
0.05
]
. There were no obvious differences in the intraoperative volume of blood loss and number of dissected lymph nodes
or in the time of intestinal function recovery
length of hospital stay
time of removing plasma drainage tube
or rate of postoperative urinary control between the 2 groups (
P
>
0.05). Postoperative urethral cystography showed that the new bladders located in normal position
with closely to normal capacity and no obvious ureteral reflux in the 2 groups. There were 2 cases of acute intestinal obstruction and intestinal ischemic necrosis after operation
1 case of incomplete intestinal obstruction and 1 cases of pulmonary infection in ECUD group
and 1 case of incomplete intestinal obstruction and 2 cases of urinary tract infection in ICUD group. All of these were relieved after corresponding treatment.
Conclusion
2
Whether complete ICUD or ECUD can obtain good clinical outcome for RARC
and the former has shorter operation time and shows better advantages of robot-assisted technology.
MENON M, HEMAL A K, TEWARI A, et al . Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion[J ] . BJU Int, 2003, 92(3): 232-236. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04329.x.
中国机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术专家协作组. 中国机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术专家共识[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39(1): 2-5. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.01.001.
China Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Expert Collaboration Group. Expert consensus on robot-assisted radical cystectomy in China[J]. Chin J Urol, 2018, 39(1): 2-5. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.01.001.
黄健. 根治性膀胱切除术——从开放到腹腔镜到机器人[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 38(8): 564-567. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2017.08.002.
HUANG J. Radical cystectomy: from open to laparoscopic to robotic surgery[J]. Chin J Urol, 2017, 38(8): 564-567. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2017.08.002
COLLINS J W, PATEL H, ADDING C, et al . Enhanced recovery after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: EAU robotic urology section scientific working group consensus view[J ] . Eur Urol, 2016, 70(4): 649-660. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.020.
HUSSEIN A A, MAY P R, JING Z, et al . Outcomes of intracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium[J ] . J Urol, 2018, 199(5): 1302-1311. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.045.
NAM J K, KIM T N, PARK S W, et al . The Studer orthotopic neobladder: long-term (more than 10 years) functional outcomes, urodynamic features, and complications[J ] . Yonsei Med J, 2013, 54(3): 690-695. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.690.
GHANDOUR R, SINGLA N, LOTAN Y. Treatment options and outcomes in nonmetastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer[J]. Trends Cancer, 2019, 5(7): 426-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.05.011.
王帅, 祁小龙, 刘锋, 等. 完全腔镜下根治性膀胱切除术及体内原位新膀胱重建术: 10年回顾性分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 41 (11): 830-834. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20200520-00408.
WANG S, QI X L, LIU F, et al . Retrospective analysis of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with complete intracorporealorthotopic neobladder reconstruction covering a peiord of ten years[J ] . Chin J Urol, 2020, 41 (11): 830-834. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20200520-00408.
黄健, 董文. 微创时代根治性膀胱切除术后尿流改道的选择[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39(7): 489-492. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.07.003.
HUANG J, DONG W. Choice of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy in minimally invasive era[J]. Chin J Urol, 2018, 39(7): 489-492. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.07.003.
KATAYAMA S, MORI K, PRADERE B, et al . Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J ] . Int J Clin Oncol, 2021, 26(9): 1587-1599. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01972-2.
DASON S, GOH A C. Contemporary techniques and outcomes of robotic cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversions[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2018, 28(2): 115-122. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000472.
周晓洲, 郑霁, 刘洋, 等. 机器人辅助女性根治性膀胱切除全腹腔内原位回肠W形新膀胱术的初步疗效[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39 (8): 596-600. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.08.010.
ZHOU X Z, ZHENG J, LIU Y, et al . Female robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic W-shaped ileal neobladder[J ] . Chin J Urol, 2018, 39 (8): 596-600. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.08.010.
AKBULUT Z, CANDA A E, OZCAN M F, et al . Robot-assisted laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy with bilateral extended lymph node dissection and intracorporeal Studer pouch construction: outcomes of first 12 cases[J ] . J Endourol, 2011, 25(9): 1469-1479. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0632.
AHMED K, KHAN S A, HAYN M H, et al . Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium[J ] . Eur Urol, 2014, 65(2): 340-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042.
PORRECA A, MINEO BIANCHI F, ROMAGNOLI D, et al . Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion: surgical and early functional outcomes through the learning curve in a single high-volume center[J ] . J Robot Surg, 2020, 14(2): 261-269. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00977-4.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
