Common causes and treatment strategies for circumcision-related glans amputation

Bo ZHOU; Yanfeng LI; Congcong BAO

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.202003195

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Common causes and treatment strategies for circumcision-related glans amputation

Clinical Medicine | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- Common causes and treatment strategies for circumcision-related glans amputation
- Journal of Third Military Medical University Vol. 42, Issue 14, Pages: 1434-1440(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  400042 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)大坪医院泌尿外科
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.202003195
  CLC： R619.5;R697.1;R699.8
- Received：16 March 2020，
  
  Revised：2020-03-26，
  
  Published：30 July 2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Bo ZHOU, Yanfeng LI, Congcong BAO. Common causes and treatment strategies for circumcision-related glans amputation[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2020, 42(14): 1434-1440.
DOI：

Bo ZHOU, Yanfeng LI, Congcong BAO. Common causes and treatment strategies for circumcision-related glans amputation[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2020, 42(14): 1434-1440. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202003195.

摘要

目的

探讨包皮环切术相关龟头离断伤的常见病因和治疗策略。

方法

我院于2019年6月26日收治了1例7岁的龟头离断伤患儿。该患儿在外院接受一次性包皮切割吻合器包皮环切手术，术中发生部分龟头及系带完全离断，离体组织被装入冰盐水中保存，患儿被急诊送入我院。急诊手术中探查证实冠状沟远端约1/3龟头组织及其腹侧系带被完全铡刀样离断，遂对其实施了“显微镜下离断龟头修复+龟头再植术+尿道端-端吻合术”。同时结合该例包皮切割吻合器导致的龟头离断伤的治疗经验，通过文献复习，分析包皮环切术相关龟头离断伤的常见病因和治疗策略。

结果

术后患儿恢复良好，龟头外观和排尿完全恢复正常，无尿道狭窄和尿瘘出现，勃起功能正常存在。文献复习结果提示:包皮环切器械导致的龟头离断伤远远多于徒手的传统手术。Ⅰ期治疗方式最常见的为龟头再植术(54.3%)和尿道端-端吻合术(31.4%)，Ⅱ期治疗方式最常见的为龟头重建术(44.4%)。

结论

器械操作不当是包皮环切术相关龟头离断伤发生的最主要原因。尽早进行“显微镜下龟头再植术和尿道端-端吻合术”效果较理想。如丧失早期再植机会，后期可通过龟头重建等多种技术恢复龟头外观和正常排尿。

Abstract

Objective

To discuss the common causes and treatment strategies of circumcision-related glans amputation.

Methods

A 7-year-old boy underwent circumcision at a local hospital using a disposable circumcision stapler

during which complete severing of the glans penis and the frenulum occurred due to surgical error. The boy was immediately transferred to our hospital with the amputated tissue preserved in iced saline. Emergency surgical exploration confirmed that about 1/3 of the glans tissue and its ventral frenulum at the distal end of the coronary sulcus were completely severed by a guillotine-type cut. We then performed microscopic repair of the severed glans with glans replantation and end-to-end urethrostomy. Based on our experience with treatment of glans amputation caused by a circumcision stapler and review of the literature

we discuss the common causes and treatment methods of circumcision-related glans amputation.

Results

The child recovered well after the surgery with normal morphology of the glans and normal urinary function. No ureteral stricture or urinary fistula occurred after the surgery

and the boy's erectile function was normal. Literature review showed that amputation of the glans caused by circumcision instrument occurs much more frequently than that caused by manual operation. The most common treatment in stage I is glans replantation (54.3%) and urethra end-to-end anastomosis (31.4%)

and glans reconstruction is the most common stage Ⅱ treatment (44.4%).

Conclusion

Improper operation of equipment is the main cause of circumcision-related glans amputation. The ideal early treatment is microscopic replantation of the glans and end-to-end urethrostomy as early as possible. If the opportunity of early replantation is lost

various techniques such as reconstruction of glans can be used to restore the appearance of the glans and normal urinary function.

关键词

Keywords

references

PATIAL T, SHARMA G, RAINA P. Traumatic penile amputation: a case report[J]. BMC Urol, 2017, 17(1): 93. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0285-4.

PIPPI SALLE J L, JESUS L E, LORENZO A J, et al . Glans amputation during routine neonatal circumcision: mechanism of injury and strategy for prevention[J ] . J Pediatr Urol, 2013, 9(6 Pt A): 763-768. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.09.012.

KHAIREDDINE B, ADNEN H, KHALED B M, et al . Surgical reimplantation of penile glans amputation in children during circumcision[J ] . Urol Ann, 2014, 6(1): 85-87. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.127024.

INCE B, DADACı M, ALTUNTAŞ Z, et al . Rarely seen complications of circumcision, and their management[J ] . Turk J Urol, 2016, 42(1): 12-15. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.78972.

GLUCKMAN G R, STOLLER M L, JACOBS M M, et al . Newborn penile glans amputation during circumcision and successful reattachment[J ] . J Urol, 1995, 153(3 Pt 1): 778-779.

SHERMAN J, BORER J G, HOROWITZ M, et al . Circumcision: successful glanular reconstruction and survival following traumatic amputation[J ] . J Urol, 1996, 156(2 Pt 2): 842-844.

MANENTSA M, MUKUDU H, KOLOANE N, et al . Complications of high volume circumcision: Glans amputation in adolescents; a case report[J ] . BMC Urol, 2019, 19(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0462-8.

APPIAH K A, GYASI-SARPONG C K, AZORLIADE R, et al . Circumcision-related tragedies seen in children at thekomfo anokye teaching hospital, Kumasi, Ghana[J ] . BMC Urol, 2016, 16(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-016-0183-1.

FAYDACI G, UǦUR K, OSMAN C, et al . Amputation of Glans penis: a rare circumcision complication and successful management with primary anastomosis and hyperbaric oxygentherapy[J ] . Korean J Urol, 2011, 52(2): 147-149. DOI: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.2.147.

GIOVANNY A, WAHYUDI I, RODJANI A. Neo-glans reconstruction after glans amputation during circumcision using autologous buccal mucosal graft[J]. Urol Case Rep, 2018, 18: 11-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2018.01.019.

STRIMLING B S. Partial amputation of glans penis during Mogen clamp circumcision[J]. Pediatrics, 1996, 97(6 Pt 1): 906-907.

ABOUTALEB H. Reconstruction of an amputated glans penis with abuccal mucosal graft: case report of a novel technique[J]. Korean J Urol, 2014, 55(12): 841-843. DOI: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.841.

NASR R, TRABOULSI S L, ABOU GHAIDA R R, et al . Iatrogenic penile glans amputation: major novel reconstructive procedure[J ] . Case Rep Urol, 2013, 2013: 741980. DOI: 10.1155/2013/741980.

APPIAH K, AMOAH G, AZORLIADE R, et al .Glanuloplasty with oral mucosa graft following total glans penis amputation[J ] . Case Rep Urol, 2014, 2014: 671303. DOI: 10.1155/2014/671303.

OKEKE L I, ASINOBI A A, IKUEROWO O S. Epidemiology of complications of male circumcision in Ibadan, Nigeria[J]. BMC Urol, 2006, 6: 21. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-6-21.

BEN CHAIM J, LIVNE P M, BINYAMINI J, et al . Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicentersurvey[J ] . Isr Med Assoc J, 2005, 7(6): 368-370.

NEULANDER E, WALFISCH S, KANETI J. Amputation of distal penile glans during neonatal ritual circumcision: a rare complication[J]. Br J Urol, 1996, 77(6): 924-925. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.06934.x.

EKENZE S O, EZOMIKE U O. Complications of neonatal circumcision requiring surgical intervention in a developingcountry[J]. J Trop Pediatr, 2013, 59(4): 292-297. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmt020.

HANUKOGLU A, DANIELLI L, KATZIR Z, et al . Serious complications of routine ritual circumcision in a neonate: hydro-ureteronephrosis, amputation of glans penis, and hyponatraemia[J ] . Eur J Pediatr, 1995, 154(4): 314-315.

CHARLESWORTH P, CAMPBELL A, KAMALEDEEN S, et al . Surgical repair of traumatic amputation of the glans[J ] . Urology, 2011, 77(6): 1472-1473. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.034.

EL-BAHNASAWY M S, EL-SHERBINY M T.Paediatric penile trauma[J]. BJU Int, 2002, 90(1): 92-96. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02741.x.

CEYLAN K, BURHAN K, YILMAZ Y, et al . Severe complications of circumcision: an analysis of 48 cases[J ] . J Pediatr Urol, 2007, 3(1): 32-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.02.009.

TAMBO F F. Circumcision accidents in Yaoundé, Cameroon: a report on five cases[J]. Prog Urol, 2012, 22(1): 63-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2011.06.003.

MOKHLESS I A, ABDELDAEIM H M, RAHMAN A, et al . Penile advancement and lengthening for the management of post-circumcision traumatic short penis inadolescents[J ] . Urology, 2010, 76(6): 1483-1487. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.018.

COŜKUNFIRAT O K, SAYILKAN S, VELIDEDEOGLU H. Glans and penile skin amputation as a complication of circumcision[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 1999, 43(4): 457. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199910000-00022.

SHAEER O, EL-SEBAIE A. Construction of neoglans penis: a new sculpturing technique from rectus abdominis myofascial flap[J]. J Sex Med, 2005, 2(2): 259-265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20237.x.

DIETH A G, MOH-ELLO N, FIOGBE M, et al . Accidents of circumcision in children in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire[J ] . Bull Soc Pathol Exot, 2008, 101(4): 314-315. DOI: 10.3185/pathexo3134.

COOK A, KHOURY A E, BAGLI D J, et al . Use of buccal mucosa to simulate the coronal sulcus after traumatic penile amputation [J ] . Urology, 2005, 66(5): 1109. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.010.

MENAHEM S. Complications arising from ritual circumcision: pathogenesis and possible prevention[J]. Isr J Med Sci, 1981, 17(1): 45-48.

BASKIN L S, CANNING D A, SNYDER H M 3rd, et al . Surgical repair of urethral circumcision injuries[J ] . J Urol, 1997, 158(6): 2269-2271. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68233-8.

BEN CHAIM J, LIVNE P M, BINYAMINI J, et al . Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicentersurvey[J ] . Isr Med Assoc J, 2005, 7(6): 368-370.

WISWELL T E, GESCHKE D W. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcisedboys[J]. Pediatrics, 1989, 83(6): 1011-1015.

MANJI K P. Circumcision of the young infant in a developing country using the Plastibell[J]. Ann Trop Paediatr, 2000, 20(2): 101-104. DOI: 10.1080/02724936.2000.11748116.

O'BRIEN T R, CALLE E E, POOLE W K. Incidence of neonatal circumcision in Atlanta, 1985-1986[J]. South Med J, 1995, 88(4): 411-415. DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199504000-00005.

PATEL H I, MORIARTY K P, BRISSON P A, et al . Genitourinary injuries in the newborn[J ] . J Pediatr Surg, 2001, 36(1): 235-239. DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20062.

JEZIOR J R, BRADY J D, SCHLOSSBERG S M. Management of penile amputation injuries[J]. World J Surg, 2001, 25(12): 1602-1609. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0157-6.

WEI F C, MCKEE N H, HUERTA F J, et al . Microsurgical replantation of a completely amputated penis[J ] . Ann Plast Surg, 1983, 10(4): 317-321. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-198304000-00011.

BELINKY J J, CHELIZ G M, GRAZIANO C A, et al . Glanuloplasty with urethral flap after partial penectomy[J ] . J Urol, 2011, 185(1): 204-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.010.

GREENBERGER M L, LOWE B A. Penile stump advancement as an alternative toperineal urethrostomy after penile amputation[J]. J Urol, 1999, 161(3): 893-894.

MAZZA O N, CHELIZ G M.Glanuloplasty with scrotal flap for partial penectomy[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(3): 887-889.

INCE B, GUNDESLIOGLU A O. A salvage operation for total penis amputation due tocircumcision[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2013, 40(3): 247-250. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.247.

PALMINTERI E, BERDONDINI E, LAZZERI M, et al . Resurfacing and reconstruction of the Glanspenis[J ] . Eur Urol, 2007, 52(3): 893-898. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.047.

HUANG Y, TONG D D, ZHU S, et al . Evaluation of microvascular anastomosis using real-time, ultra-high-resolution, Fourier domain Doppler optical coherence tomography[J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 135(4): 711e-720e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001124.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰