Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: safety, efficacy and complications

Bin JIANG; Lingmin ZHANG; Tianyu SUN; Qunyou TAN; Ruwen WANG

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201907234

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: safety, efficacy and complications

Clinical Medicine | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: safety, efficacy and complications
- Journal of Third Military Medical University Vol. 41, Issue 22, Pages: 2199-2204(2019)
- 作者机构：
  
  400042 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)大坪医院全军胸外科研究所
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201907234
  CLC： R181.31;R573.7;R656.61
- Received：25 July 2019，
  
  Revised：2019-09-27，
  
  Published：30 November 2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Bin JIANG, Lingmin ZHANG, Tianyu SUN, et al. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: safety, efficacy and complications[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(22): 2199-2204.
DOI：

Bin JIANG, Lingmin ZHANG, Tianyu SUN, et al. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: safety, efficacy and complications[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2019, 41(22): 2199-2204. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201907234.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜Heller手术(laparoscopic heller myotomy，LHM)和经口内镜下肌切开术(peroral endoscopic myotomy，POEM)治疗贲门失弛缓症的临床疗效，探讨POEM术后胃食管反流并发症的治疗策略。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究的方法，收集2012年10月至2017年4月我院收治的61例贲门失弛缓症患者的临床资料，其中30例行腹腔镜Heller手术加部分胃底折叠术(Dor)为腹腔镜组(LHM组)；31例行经口内镜下肌切开术为内镜组(POEM组)，随访至2019年4月，比较两组患者的基本资料、手术情况、临床疗效以及胃食管反流并发症(包括胃食管反流症状、病理性酸反流、食管炎)的情况。

结果

患者均顺利完成手术，无围术期死亡。LHM组和POEM组患者在手术时间、术中出血量、围术期并发症、平均住院日、住院费用等方面差异无统计学意义。LHM组和POEM组的治疗有效率分别为86.7%(26/30)和90.3%(28/31)，差异无统计学意义。两组患者术后Ecardt评分、下段食管静息压较术前均明显下降(

0.001)，但两组之间比较，差异无统计学意义；POEM组术后胃食管反流症状(3/27

11/20

=0.018)、病理性酸反流(4/26

12/18

=0.024)、食管炎(2/28

9/22

=0.023)发生率显著高于LHM组。临床相关胃食管反流发生率在POEM组更高(1/29

7/24

=0.026)。

结论

LHM与POEM治疗贲门失弛缓症的安全性及中远期疗效相近，但是POEM手术缺乏抗反流措施，可导致胃食管反流发生率升高，术后应密切随访并积极干预。

Abstract

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia

and investigate the strategy for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after POEM.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted among 61 patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for achalasia in our hospital between October

2012 and April

2017. Of the 61 patients

30 underwent LHM with Dor fundoplication (LHM group) and 31 underwent POEM. All patients were followed up to April

2019. The general and perioperative data

clinical efficacy

and incidence of GERD complications (including GERD symptoms

pathological acid reflux and esophagitis) were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The operations were completed smoothly in all the patients without perioperative death. There were no significant differences between LHM and POEM groups in the operation time

intraoperative blood loss

perioperative complications

mean hospital stay or hospital costs. The 2 operations produced similar therapeutic effective rate [86.7% (26/30)

90.3%(28/31)

0.05

]

and the Ecardt score and the lower esophageal sphincter pressure were decreased significantly in both groups after the operation (

0.001)

but there were no difference between the 2 operations. Compared with LHM

POEM was associated with significantly higher incidences of GERD symptoms (3/27

11/20

=0.018)

pathological acid reflux (4/26

12/18

=0.024)

and esophagitis (2/28

9/22

=0.023); the incidence of clinically relevant GERD was much higher in POEM group than in LHM group (1/29

7/24

=0.026).

Conclusion

LHM and POEM have similar safety and mid- and long-term efficacies for treatment of achalasia

but the absence of an antireflux wrap in POEM surgery leads to an increased risk of GERD. Patients planning to undergo POEM surgery should be closely followed after the surgery and given timely implementation of active interventions.

关键词

Keywords

references

VAEZIM F, PANDOLFINO J E, VELA M F. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108(8): 1238-1249. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.196.

PANDOLFINOJ E, GAWRON A J. Achalasia: a systematic review[J]. JAMA, 2015, 313(18): 1841-1852. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.2996.

INOUE H, MINAMI H, KOBAYASHI Y, et al . Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia[J ] . End oscopy, 2010, 42(4): 265-271. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080.

KUMAGAI K, TSAIJ A, THORELL A, et al . Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Are results comparable to laparoscopic Heller myotomy?[J ] . Scand J Gastroenterol, 2015, 50(5): 505-512. DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2014.934915.

DE PASCALE S, REPICI A, PUCCETTI F, et al . Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus surgical myotomy for primary achalasia: single-center retrospective analysis of 74 patients[J ] . Dis Esophagus, 2017, 30(8): 1-7. DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox028.

ANNESE V, BASSOTTI G, COCCIA G, et al . A multicentre randomised study of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin in patients with oesophageal achalasia. GISMAD Achalasia Study Group[J ] . Gut, 2000, 46(5): 597-600. DOI: 10.1136/gut.46.5.597.

ZANINOTTO G, BENNETT C, BOECKXSTAENS G, et al . The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines[J ] . Dis Esophagus, 2018, 31(9). DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy071.

ZANINOTTO G, COSTANTINI M, RIZZETTO C, et al . Four hundred laparoscopic myotomies for esophageal achalasia: a single centre experience[J ] . Ann Surg, 2008, 248(6): 986-993. DO I: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181907bdd.

CHEN Z, BESSELLJ R, CHEW A, et al . Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy for achalasia: clinical outcomes beyond 5 years[J ] . J Gastrointest Surg, 2010, 14(4): 594-600. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1158-2.

COSTANTINI M, ZANINOTTO G, GUIRROLI E, et al . The laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation remains an effective treatment for esophageal achalasia at a minimum 6-year follow-up[J ] . Surg Endosc, 2005, 19(3): 345-351. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8941-7.

LI Q L, CHEN W F, ZHOU P H, et al . Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a clinical comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy[J ] . J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 217(3): 442-451. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.033.

MARANO L, PALLABAZZER G, SOLITO B, et al . Surgery or peroral esophageal myotomy for achalasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J ] . Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(10): e3001. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003001.

ZHANG Y, WANG H J, CHEN X D, et al . Per-oral endoscopic myotomy versus laparoscopic heller myotomy for achalas ia: A meta-analysis of nonrandomized comparative studies[J ] . Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(6): e2736. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002736.

SCHLOTTMANN F, PATTIM G. Laparoscopic heller myotomy versus per oral endoscopic myotomy: evidence-based approach to the treatment of esophageal achalasia[J]. Am Surg, 2018, 84(4): 496-500.

REPICI A, FUCCIO L, MASELLI R, et al . GERD after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller's myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J ] . Gastrointest Endosc, 2018, 87(4): 934-943.e18. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.022.

SANAKAM R, THOTA P N, PARIKH M P, et al . Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia[J ] . Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(7): 2284-2292. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6522-4.

贺德志, 王娟, 韩艳妙, 等.环形肌切开和全层肌切开治疗贲门失弛缓症长期随访研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35(5): 327-331. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2018.05.006.

HE D Z, WANG J, HAN Y M, et al . Long-term efficacy of peroral endoscopic circular myotomy and full-thickness myotomy on treatment of achalasia of cardia[J ] . Chin J Dig Endosc, 2018, 35(5): 327-331. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2018.05.006.

KHASHABM A. The use of peroral endoscopic myotomy for the management of achalasia[J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y), 2018, 14(6): 387-389.

KRISTENSEN H Ø, KIRKEGÅRD J, KJÆR D W, et al . Long-term outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia in patients with previous Heller myotomy[J ] . Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(6): 2596-2601. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5267-1.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Different surgical procedures of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a comparative study of 56 cases

Curative effect analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy in treatment of 15 cases of achalasia

Related Author

蒲文凤

代剑华

袁月

陈瑶

吴宏博

彭贵勇

赵国策

赵晓晏

Related Institution

No data

⁰