Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel

Xiaofan YAN; Zhengzhi FENG

doi:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel

Military Medicine | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel
- Journal of Third Military Medical University Vol. 40, Issue 18, Pages: 1619-1623(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  400038重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系行为医学教研室
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(31640036);the Military Psychology Youth Innovation Project of the Faculty of Medical Psychology of Army Medical University(XY2017203)
- DOI：10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075
  CLC： R395.1;R821.2
- Received：10 May 2018，
  
  Revised：2018-06-30，
  
  Published：30 September 2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Xiaofan YAN, Zhengzhi FENG. Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623.
DOI：

Xiaofan YAN, Zhengzhi FENG. Assessment of reliability and validity of Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire in military personnel[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(18): 1619-1623. DOI： 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201805075.

摘要

目的

将自编负性认知加工偏向问卷施测于军人群体，以进一步探索问卷的结构及信度。

方法

通过问卷调查法，对某部4 631名军人进行测查。并对所收集数据进行统计分析，以检测负性认知加工偏向问卷的结构以及信度指标。

结果

最终保留问卷的13个题项，删除负性解释偏向这一维度的题项，保留负性注意偏向、负性记忆偏向、负性沉思偏向3个维度，3个维度共可解释总问卷60.78%的变异；模型拟合指标都在标准范围之内(RMSEA=0.05，GFI=0.974，NFI=0.967，CFI=0.970，IFI=0.970)。问卷及各维度的内部一致性信度在0.79～0.89之间，各维度之间及其与总分之间呈正相关(

为0.57～0.89，

0.01)，各维度及总分与流调中心用抑郁量表总分呈正相关(

为0.41～0.53，

0.01)。

结论

经过删减后的负性认知加工偏向问卷在军人群体中的测量具有良好的信效度。

Abstract

Objective

To examine the reliability and validity of the Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire (NCPBQ) in military personnel.

Methods

A total of 4 631 military personnel were tested using the NCPBQ

Center for Epidemiological Survey-Depression Scale (CES-D)

and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The collected data were statistically analyzed to assess the structure and reliability of the NCPBQ.

Results

The final version of NCPBQ included 13 items in 3 dimensions covering negative attention bias

negative memory bias and negative rumination bias. These 3 dimensions accounted for 60.78% of the total variance of the questionnaire. The 3-dimension model fitting indexes of NCPBQ were within the standard range (RMSEA=0.05

GFI=0.974

NFI=0.967

CFI=0.970

and IFI=0.970). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire score and the scores of the 3 dimensions ranged from 0.79 to 0.89. The scores for negative attention bias

negative memory bias

and negative rumination bias all showed significant positive correlations with the total score of the questionnaire (

=0.57～0.89

0.01). The CES-D score was positively correlated with the total NCPBQ score and the scores for negative attention bias

negative memory bias and negative rumination bias (

=0.41～0.53

0.01).

Conclusion

The NCPBQ is of high reliability and validity for measurement among military personnel after appropriate modification.

关键词

Keywords

references

闫晓钒, 张睿, 冯正直.负性认知加工偏向问卷的研制[J].第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.

YAN X F, ZHANG R, FENG Z Z. Development of negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2017, 39(23): 2329-2334. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201707160.

KOSTER E H, HOORELBEKE K. Cognitive bias modification for depression[J]. Curr Opin Psychol, 2015, 4: 119-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc. 2014.11.012.

WATKINS E. Psychological treatment of depressive rumination[J]. Curr Opin Psychol, 2015, 4: 32-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.020.

LEMOGNE C, MAYBERG H, BERGOUIGNAN L, et al . Self-referential processing and the prefrontal cortex over the course of depression: a pilot study[J ] . J Affect Disord, 2010, 124(1/2): 196-201. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.003.

周敏, 胡治国.抑郁症患者自我相关加工的fMRI研究现状[J].中国医学影像技术, 2014, 30(1): 149-152. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2014.01.033.

ZHOU M, HU Z G. Status of fMRI studies on abnormalities of self-related processing in depression[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2014, 30(1): 149-152. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2014.01.033.

FOSSATI P. Is major depression a cognitive disorder?[J]. Rev Neurol-France, 2018, 174(4): 212-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.01.365.

EVERAERT J, PODINA I R, KOSTER E H W. A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression[J]. Clin Psychol Rev, 2017, 58: 33-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.005.

CHEN S, YAO N, QIAN M, et al . Attentional biases in high social anxiety using a flanker task[J ] . J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2016, 51: 27-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep. 2015.12.002.

ROZENMAN M, AMIR N, WEERSING V R. Performance-based interpretation bias in clinically anxious youths: relationships with attention, anxiety, and negative cognition[J]. Behav Ther, 2014, 45(5): 594-605. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.03.009.

魏威, 谢庆斌, 朱晶晶, 等.儿童执行功能量表在中国学前儿童中的信效度分析[J].中国临床心理学杂质, 2018, 26(1): 26-29. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.01.006.

WEI W, XIE Q B, ZHU J J, et al . The psychometric characteristics of childhood executive functioning inventory among Chinese preschoolers[J ] . Chin J Clin Psy, 2018, 26(1): 26-29. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.01.006.

RADLOFF L S. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population[J]. App Psychol Measure, 1977, 3(1): 385-401.

郑晓华, 李延知.状态-特质焦虑问卷[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 1997, 11(4): 219-220.

ZHENG X H, LI Y Z. State trait anxiety inventory[J]. Chin J Ment Heal, 1997, 11(4): 219-220.

徐媛媛, 谢守蓉, 李丽, 等.情绪调节方式在军人幸福感促进心理健康中的作用[J].第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(15): 1520-1524. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704040.

XU Y Y, XIE S R, LI L, et al . Happiness promotes mental health among military personnel:mediation effect of emotion regulation types[J ] . J Third Mil Med Univ, 2017, 39(15): 1520-1524. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201704040.

吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2013: 483-493.

WU M L. Practice of statistical analysis of questionnaire: SPSS operation and application[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2013: 483-493.

温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报, 2004, 36(2): 186-194.

WEN Z L, HAU K T, MARSH H W, Structural equation model testing:cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and chi-square test[J]. J Acta Psychol Sinica, 2004, 36(2): 186-194.

NAIM R, KIVITY Y, BAR-HAIM Y, et al . Attention and interpretation bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and synergy[J ] . J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2018, 59: 19-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.10.006.

LICHTENSTEIN-VIDNE L, OKON-SINGER H, COHEN N, et al . Attentional bias in clinical depression and anxiety: The impact of emotionaland non-emotional distracting information[J ] . Biol Psychol, 2017, 122: 4-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho. 2016.07.012.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Development of negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire

亲子疏离问卷在军人群体中的修订、信效度检验和常模初步构建

Psychometric properties of different pain measuring scales in patients during perioperative period of lung resection

Development and analysis of a urinary retention risk assessment scale for patients after primary hip arthroplasty

Construction and reliability and validity of a risk assessment scale for venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients

Related Author

Xiaofan YAN

Rui ZHANG

Zhengzhi FENG

TAN Jieying

SUN Xiaoxiao

DAI Zongpei

JIN Chenxuan

XIANG Wenjun

Related Institution

Department of Behavioral Medicine, School of Psychology, Third Military Medical University

Troop 77322, Wenshan

Department of Behavior Medicine, Army Military Medical University(Third Military Medical University)

Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology of Armyman, Faculty of Medical Psychology, Army Military Medical University(Third Military Medical University)

⁰