Ling WANG, Liang HU, Chang LIU, et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes in 267 nulliparous women after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(20): 1865-1869.
DOI:
Ling WANG, Liang HU, Chang LIU, et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes in 267 nulliparous women after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(20): 1865-1869. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201803109.
Analysis of pregnancy outcomes in 267 nulliparous women after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids
To investigate the pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of uterine fibroids.
Methods
2
Between January
2010 and December
2016
423 nulliparous women with uterine fibroids underwent HIFU treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. a total of 267 of these women who had pregnancy intention were enrolled in this study
and their pregnancy outcomes were followed up and the factors affecting the pregnancy outcomes were explored.
Results
2
During the follow-up (median 4 years
ranging from 1 to 7 years)
a total of 157 pregnancies were recorded in 155 women. The average time to pregnancy was 14.1±12.4 months following HIFU
with a pregnancy rate of 58.80% (157/267) and a spontaneous conception rate of 93.63% (147/157). a total of 109 live births (including 6 twins) were achieved in 106 successful deliveries
with a caesarean section rate of 69.81% (74/106). On-going pregnancies were found in 26 women. Multivariate analysis revealed that age and a history of infertility were the primary factors affecting the postoperative pregnancy after HIFU (
P
<
0.05)
while the changes in myoma volume after HIFU or the type of myoma did not significantly affect the postoperative pregnancy (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusions
2
Nulliparous women receiving HIFU for uterine fibroids can have a favorable postoperative pregnancy outcome
suggesting the value of HIFU in treatment of uterine fibroids in nulliparous women who have pregnancy intentions. The main factors affecting postoperative pregnancy are age and a history of preoperative infertility.
关键词
Keywords
references
ALEKSANDROVYCH V, BEREZA T, SAJEWICZ M, et al. Uterine fibroid: common features of widespread tumor (Review article)[J]. Folia Med Cracov, 2015, 55(1): 61-75.
LENG J H, LI L.Laparoscopic myomectomy related clinical problems[J]. Chin J Prac Gynecol Obstet, 2012, 28(12): 895-898.
RACKOW B W, TAYLOR H S. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity[J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93(6): 2027-2034. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2008.03.029.
ZHU L, CHEN W Z, CHEN J Y, et al. Response of conscious-sedation in ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids[J]. J Chongqing Med Univ, 2009, 34(11): 1556-1558. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.2009.11.07
SHI Y F. The effect of pregnancy on uterine fibroids[M]// LANG J H, SHI Y F, WANG Z B. Uterine myoma. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2014: 178-179.
QIN J, CHEN J Y, ZHAO W P, et al. Outcome of unintended pregnancy after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2012, 117(3): 273-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo. 2012.01.011.
CHETTA J, HU Y Z. Use of real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for medical devices[EB/OL]. [2017-10-10]. https: //www. fda. gov/Medical Devices/ NewsEvents/Worksshops Conferences/ucm574232. htm.
BERNARDI T S, RADOSA M P, WEISHEIT A, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a 6-year follow-upsingle-center cohort analysis of fertility and obstetric outcome measures[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 290(1): 87-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3155-2.
RADHIKA B H, NAIK K, SHREELATHA S, et al. Case series: pregnancy outcome in patients with uterine fibroids[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(10): QR01-QR04. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/ 2015/14375.6621.
KLATSKY P C, TRAN N D, CAUGHEY A B, et al. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 198(4): 357-366. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.039.
LI J S, CHEN W Z, HU L, et al. Analyze relevant influence factors on reproductive outcomes after HIFU ablation treatment for infertile women with uterine fibroids[J]. Chin J Ultrasound Med, 2016, 32(11): 1018-1022.
LI J S, CHEN W Z, HU L, et al. Effect of pregnancy on target fibroids and pregnancy outcome after ultrasound ablation[J]. Chin J Interv Imaging Ther, 2017, 14(5): 278-282. DOI: 10.13929/j.1672-8475.201610026.
VITAGLIANO A, NOVENTA M, DI SPIEZIO SARDO A, et al. Uterine fibroid size modifications during pregnancy and puerperium: evidence from the first systematic review of literature[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2018, 297(4): 823-835. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4621-4.
ZOU M, XIONG Y, WANG L, et al. Pregnancy outcome of patients with multiple uterine fibroids treated with high intensity focused ultrasound[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2016, 32(2): 132-135. DOI: 10.7504/fk2016010105.
HANSTEDE M M, TEMPANY C M, STEWART E A. Focused ultrasound surgery of intramural leiomyomas may facilitate fertility: a case report[J]. Fertil Steril, 2007, 88(2): 497-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2006.11.103.
KOO Y J, LEE J K, LEE Y K, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy: a single-center experience and literature review[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(6): 1022-1028. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.016.
CAI H F, LIU X Y, WANG J, et al. Analysis of perinatal outcomes in 232 adolescent primiparas[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2017, 39(15): 1574-1577. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201702134.
TOPÇU H O, İSKENDER C T, TIMUR H, et al. Outcomes after cesarean myomectomy versus cesarean alone among pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas[J]. Int JGynaecol Obstet, 2015, 130(3): 244-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo. 2015.03.035.
SWARRAY-DEEN A, MENSAH-BROWN S A, COLEMAN J. Rare complication of fibroids in pregnancy: Spontaneous fibroid rupture[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2017, 43(9): 1485-1488. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13405.