Jing LIU, Ya XIAO. Clinical study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(15): 1419-1423.
DOI:
Jing LIU, Ya XIAO. Clinical study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(15): 1419-1423. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201801081.
Clinical study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi
To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi.
Methods
2
Clinical data of 47 patients with multiple large staghorn calculi
who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University) were collected and retrospective analyzed. They were 29 males and 18 females
and at an average age of 45 (28 to 67) years. There were 27 cases of left kidney stones and 20 cases of right kidney stones
20 cases of intrarenal pelvis kidney and 27 cases of extrarenal pelvis kidney
and 23 cases of pelvic calculi with 2 calyceal calculi
and 24 cases of pelvic calculi with 3 or more calyceal calculi. In these patients
the average number of stones was more than 3
and the calculi had a maximal diameter of 1.9 to 4.3 cm
averagely 2.9 cm. All patients received retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy to remove pelvic calculi
followed by transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy for removal of residual calculi fragments. Complications
operation time
bleeding volume and stone-free rate after single surgery were counted and analyzed. All these cases were followed up to observe recurrence after 3 months.
Results
2
The surgery was completed successfully in all the 47 cases
with no death or serious complications observed. The operation time was 123±12 min while the time of ureteroscopic application was 34±9 min
and the blood loss was 76±18 mL. Calculi were removed completely in 44 cases (93.62%). Two patients (4.26%) had residual stones (≤ 3 mm) and got stone free in 2 weeks later after conventional therapy (large amount of drinking water and oral administration of tanzosoria hydrochloride)
and 1 patient (2.13%) who had residual stones in maximal size of 5 mm had to underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy after 2 weeks of conventional therapy
and then got stone-free in another 2 weeks later. No recurrence was seen during the 3 months' follow-up.
Conclusion
2
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyelvic flexible ureteroscopy is safe and efficient
and with high stone-free rate after single surgery in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi.
WANG L, XU X J, YIN H J, et al . Comparative study on clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with holmiu m laser lithotripsy and open renal lithotomy treatment for complex renal calculi[J ] . China J Endoscopy, 2014, 20(1):72-75.
LU P, WANG Z, SONG R, et al . The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J ] . Urolithiasis, 2015, 43(3):199-206. DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5.
AMINSHARIFI A, IRANI D, MASOUMI M, et al . The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy:a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome[J ] . Urolithiasis, 2016, 44(6):551-557. DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0877-6.
DE FATA-CHILLON F R, GIMBERNAT-DIAZ H, REDONDO-REDONDO C, et al . Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi:feasibility study[J ] . Arch Esp Urol, 2017, 70(5):542-549.
KIM B S. Recent advancement or less invasive treatment of percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Korean J Urol, 2015, 56(9):614-623. DOI:10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.614.
YANG Z, SONG L, XIE D, et al . The new generation mini-PCNL system-monitoring and controlling of renal pelvic pressure by suctioning device for efficient and safe PCNL in managing renal staghorn calculi[J ] . Urol Int, 2016, 97(1):61-66. DOI:10.1159/000442002.
NG F C, YAM W L, LIM T Y B, et al . Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy:Advantages and limitations[J ] .Investig Clin Urol, 2017, 58(5):346-352. DOI:10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.346.
XUE D W, LIU Y L, et al . Clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephroscopy combined with flexible ureteroscope in treatment of complex kidney stones[J ] . J Chin Med Univ, 2013, 42(7):662-663. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0258-4646.2013.07.023.
QUARESIMA L, CONTI A, VICI A, et al . Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia position:A prospective analysis[J ] .Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2016, 88(2):93-96.DOI:10.4081/aiua.2016.2.93.
SANGUEDOLCE F, BOZZINI G, CHEW B, et al . The evolving role of retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of urolithiasis[J ] .Eur Urol Focus, 2017, 3(1):46-55.DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.007.
CHEN G, WEN S, et al . Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater:report of 68 cases[J ] .J Third Mil Med Univ, 2016, 38(13):1547-1551.DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201512188.
KANG S K, CHO K S, KANG D H, et al .Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones > 2 cm:An update[J ] .Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(49):e9119. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000009119.
PALMERO-MARTI J L, PANACH-NAVARRETE J, VALLS-GONZALEZ L, et al . Renal lithiasis, can we predict the need for retreatment in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)?[J ] .Arch Esp Urol, 2017, 70(5):534-541.
AMINSHARIFI A, IRANI D, MASOUMI M, et al . The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy:a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome[J ] .Urolithiasis, 2016, 44(6):551-557.DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0877-6.
GLYBOCHKO P V, ALYAEV Y G, RAPOPORT L M, et al . Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and its role in modern surgery of nephrolithiasis[J ] . Urologiia, 2017(4):12-17.
PASTORE A L, PALLESCHI G, SILVESTRI L, et al . Combined laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and endoscopic pyelolithotripsy for staghorn calculi:long-term follow-up results from a case series[J ] . Ther Adv Urol, 2016, 8(1):3-8. DOI:10.1177/1756287215607417.
Comparison of 2 procedures of gastrointestinal reconstruction by laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for tumours originating in the paracaval portion of caudate lobe
Clinical efficacy of negative pressure combined with ureteroscopy and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of unilateral upper urinary calculi
Therapeutic effect of laparoscopic-assisted treatment in children with imperforate anus and urethral fistula
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis
Related Author
李仁杰
林恒
李建伟
张雷达
王小军
田峰
李雪松
欧晏娇
Related Institution
Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University