Yi ZHOU, Jian ZHOU, Ying ZHANG, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of pemetrexed and nedaplatin in treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(13): 1236-1241.
DOI:
Yi ZHOU, Jian ZHOU, Ying ZHANG, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of pemetrexed and nedaplatin in treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(13): 1236-1241. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201801020.
Clinical efficacy and safety of pemetrexed and nedaplatin in treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma
To investigate clinical efficacy and safety of pemetrexed combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods
2
All patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2017 were recruited in this study. They were randomly divided into control group (pemetrexed combined with cisplatin) and observation group (pemetrexed combined with nedaplatin). After the patients lost in follow-up were eliminated
there were 60 patients finally subjected in this study
including 31 in the observation group and 29 in the control. The clinical efficacy
clinical outcome
toxic and side effects of chemical drugs
change of physical condition
performance status (PS
Zubrod-ECOG-WHO score)
and quality of life (QOL) were separately evaluated in the 2 groups after treatment.
Results
2
① Clinical efficacy and outcomes: There were no significant differences in overall response rate (37.93%
vs
41.94%
Chi
-square=0.072 0
P
=0.788 5)
median progression free survival (mPFS) or 1-year survival rate (
P
>
0.05) between the control and observation groups. ② Toxic and side effects of chemical drugs: The incidence rate of over grade Ⅲ leukocytopenia was significantly lower in the observation group than the control (9.68%
vs
27.59%
Chi
-square=4.251 2
P
=0.034 0). And the former group also had lower incidence rate of over grade Ⅱ nausea and vomiting (
P
<
0.05). ③ No significant differences were seen in PS score and QOL score in the both groups before and after the treatment (
P
>
0.05). ④ Evaluation an
d comparison of EORTC QLQ-C30 before and after treatment: though the QOL of the 2 groups were declined after the treatment of chemical drugs
but the total health and general situation (mental state
fatigue
nausea and vomiting) were significantly better in the observation group than the control group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Though there are no significant differences in clinical efficacy between pemetrexed combined with nedaplatin and with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma
and the former regimen has the advantages of milder side effects
higher safety and little impact on the QOL of patients. Therefore
it is worthy of popularizing widely in the treatment.
LING H H, LI T, WU X C, et al. Clinical observation of pemetrexed combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced lung adenocacinoma[J]. Chin Gen Prac, 2013, 16(21):2506-2508.
SMITH A B, COCKS K, PARRY D, et al. Reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data in oncology trials: a comparison of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G)[J]. Qual Life Res, 2014, 23(3): 971-976. DOI:10.1007/s11136-013-0534-2.
DENG T, DUAN H X. Observation of effect and adverse reaction of docetaxal plus nedaplatin induction chemotherapy for local advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Clin Med Chin, 2016, 32(12):1100-1102.
PATEL J D, SOCINSKI M A, GARON E B, et al. Pointbreak: a randomized phase Ⅲ study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage ⅢB or Ⅳ nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(34): 4349-4357. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2012.47.9626.
YU J Y, LI L J, CHEN P. Clinical study of paclitaxel liposome and nedaplatin combined with radiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer[J]. Chin Clin Oncol, 2014, 19(10):929-931.
CHEN W, FENG L, NIE H, et al. Andrographolide induces autophagic cell death in human liver cancer cells through cyclophilin D-mediated mitochondrial permeability transition pore[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2012, 33(11): 2190-2198. DOI:10.1093/carcin/bgs264.
ARAVIND A, VARGHESE S H, VEERANARAYANAN S, et al. Aptamer-labeled PLGA nanoparticles for targeting cancer cells[J]. Cancer Nanotechnol, 2012, 3(1/6): 1-12. DOI:10.1007/s12645-011-0024-6.
LI H Y, FANG H, NAN Y, et al. The efficacy and safety of pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2015, 35(9):2433-2435.
DUAN H J, GU G M, WANG X L, et al. Clinical curative effects of pemetrexed plus nedaplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Res Prev Treat, 2014, 41(1):61-64.
WU Q. Effect of concurrent chemotherapy with nedaplatin or cisplatin on locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its influence on quality of life[J]. J Med Theory Prac, 2015, 28(11):1496-1497.
Efficiency and toxic reaction of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine or paclitaxel in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: report of 133 cases
Induction chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity of nedaplatin combined tegafur for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Effect of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A on proliferation and apoptosis of lung epithelial carcinoma A549 cells
SOCS3 gene inhibits the growth of A549 cell transplantation tumor in nude mice