Effectiveness of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a meta-analysis
|更新时间:2026-03-02
|
Effectiveness of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a meta-analysis
Journal of Third Military Medical UniversityVol. 40, Issue 4, Pages: 350-355(2018)
作者机构:
400016 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院生殖健康与不孕症专科Special Department of Reproductive Health and Infertility, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
Huijia FU, Yanna BAN, Xiru LIU. Effectiveness of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(4): 350-355.
DOI:
Huijia FU, Yanna BAN, Xiru LIU. Effectiveness of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2018, 40(4): 350-355. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201710039.
Effectiveness of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a meta-analysis
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response.
Methods
2
We searched MEDLINE
EMBASE
the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)
the Chinese Biomedicine (CBM) Database
and Wanfang Database for eligible studies published by the end of July
2017. Two independent evaluators screened the randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trails retrieved that compared the effects of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol with the control protocol in women with poor ovarian response. The quality of the included studies was assessed and data were extracted for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3.
Results
2
Six studies with a total of 336 cycles were included in the final analysis. No significant differences were found between ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol group and the control group in the number of gonadotropin ampules (WMD=6.32
P
=0.09
95%
CI
: -0.92~13.55)
length of stimulation (WMD=0.38
P
=0.07
95%
CI
: -0.04~0.81) or the number of embryos transferred (WMD=0.24
P
=0.49
95%
CI
: -0.44~0.91). Ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist
combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol resulted in a greater number of oocytes retrieved (WMD=0.29
P
=0.40
95%
CI
: -0.38~0.96) and higher fertilization rate (WMD=4.39
P
=0.21
95%
CI
: -2.41~11.18) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR=1.72
P
=0.38
95%
CI
: 0.52~5.71) than the control protocol
but the differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion
2
The currently available evidence suggests that ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol is not inferior to other controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols
but this conclusion still awaits further verification by large-scale randomised controlled trials.
关键词
Keywords
references
ZEGERS-HOCHSCHILD F, ADAMSON G D, DE MOUZON J, et al . International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology[J ] . Fertil Steril, 2009, 92(5): 1520-1524. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009.
PENZIAS A S. Improving results with assisted reproductive technologies: individualized patient-tailored strategies for ovulation induction[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2004, 9(1): 43-46. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62108-6.
LAMBALK C B, BANGA F R, HUIRNE J A, et al . GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type[J ] . Hum Reprod Update, 2017, 23(5): 560-579. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx017.
ORVIETO R, PATRIZIO P. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoingdebate[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2013, 26(1): 4-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.001.
ORVIETO R, LAUFER N. Ultrashort flare gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist/GnRH antagonist protocol: a valuable tool in the armamentarium of ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization[J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102(5): 1254-1255. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.003.
ORVIETO R, Kruchkovich J, Rabinson J, et al . Ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for poor responders in in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programs[J ] . Fertil Steril, 2008, 90(1): 228-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.022.
ORVIETO R, NAHUM R, RABINSON J, et al . Ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist for patients with repeated IVF failures and poor embryo quality[J ] . Fertil Steril, 2009, 91(4 Suppl): 1398-1400. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.064.
ORVIETO R, MELTCER S, LIBERTY G, et al . A combined approach to patients with repeated IVF failures[J ] . Fertil Steril, 2010, 94(6): 2462-2464. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.057.
BERKER B, ILTEMIR DUVAN C, KAYA C, et al .Comparison of the ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-antagonist protocol with microdose flare -up protocol in poor responders: a preliminary study[J ] . J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2010, 11(4): 187-193. DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2010.35.
EFTEKHAR M, MOHAMMADIAN F, YOUSEFNEJAD F, et al . Microdose GnRH agonist flare-up versus ultrashort gnRH agonist combined with fixed GnRH antagonist in poor responders of assisted reproductive techniques cycles[J ] . Int J Fertil Steril, 2013, 6(4): 266-27 1.
ORVIETO R, NAHUM R, ZOHAV E, et al . GnRH-agonist ovulation trigger in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF with ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with multidose GnRH-antagonist protocol[J ] . Gynecol Endocrinol, 2013, 29(1): 51-53. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2012.705376.
GRIESINGER G, DIEDRICH K, TARLATZIS B C, et al . GnRH-antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with poor response to gonadotrophins, polycystic ovary syndrome, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis[J ] . Reprod Biomed Online, 2006, 13(5): 628-638.
BEN-RAFAEL Z, LIPITZ S, BIDER D, et al . Ovarian hyporesponsiveness in combined gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and menotropin therapy is associated with low serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels[J ] . Fertil Steril, 1991, 55(2): 272-275. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54114-4.
SHEEHAN K L, CASPER R F, YEN S S. Induction of luteolysis by luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (LRF) agonist: sensitivity, reproducibility, and reversibility[J]. Fertil Steril, 1982, 37(2): 209-212.
MAHUTTE N G, Arici A. Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in poor responders[J]. Fertil Steril, 2007, 87(2): 241-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1457.
FASOULIOTIS S J, LAUFER N, SABBAGH-EHRLICH S, et al . Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist in ovarian stimulation of poor responders undergoing IVF[J ] . J Assist Reprod Genet, 2003, 20(11): 455-460. DOI: 10.1023/b:jarg.0000006707.88826.e7.
MALMUSI S, LA MARCA A, GIULINI S, et al . Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation[J ] . Fertil Steril, 2005, 84(2): 402-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.139.
SCOTT R T, NAVOT D. Enhancement of ovarian responsiveness with microdoses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization[J]. Fertil Steril, 1994, 61(5): 880-885. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56700-4.
SURREY E S, BOWER J, HILL D M, et al . Clinical and endocrine effects of a microdose GnRH agonist flare regimen administered to poor responders who are undergoing in vitro fertilization[J ] . Fertil Steril, 1998, 69(3): 419-424.
KAHRAMAN K, BERKER B, ATABEKOGLU C S, et al . Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle[J ] . Fertil Steril, 2009, 91(6): 2437-2444. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057.
SIGHINOLFI G, GRISENDI V, LA MARCA A. How to personalize ovarian stimulation in clinical practice[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2017, 18(3): 148-153. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.2017.0058.
Development and validation of a prediction model for amputation risk in patients with diabetic foot ulcers based on systematic review and meta-analysis
Effect of Del Nido cardioplegia solution on myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass: a Meta-analysis
Levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a meta-analysis
Risk factors of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019: a meta-analysis
Related Author
HAN Weidong
FAN Yiming
CHEN Pan
HU Nan
HU Shiqi
XIONG Te
YIN Rui
Xu XU
Related Institution
Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University)
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University
Center for Infection and liver Disease, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
ICU, Neijiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Center of Injury Prevention, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology