Evaluation of single-utility incision thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy in radical McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Clinical Medicine|更新时间:2026-01-09
|
Evaluation of single-utility incision thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy in radical McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Journal of Third Military Medical UniversityVol. 39, Issue 18, Pages: 1854-1858(2017)
作者机构:
530021 南宁,广西壮族自治区人民医院心胸外科
作者简介:
基金信息:
the Self-raised Project of Public Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(Z2016603);the Key Project of Scientific Research of Department of Health of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(Z2010030);the Key Project of Scientific Research of Department of Health of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(Z2009136)
Zongrong LI, Bojun LI, Changchao LU, et al. Evaluation of single-utility incision thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy in radical McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2017, 39(18): 1854-1858.
DOI:
Zongrong LI, Bojun LI, Changchao LU, et al. Evaluation of single-utility incision thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy in radical McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2017, 39(18): 1854-1858. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201702071.
Evaluation of single-utility incision thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy in radical McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
摘要
目的
2
评估单操作孔胸腔镜联合腹腔镜在McKeown食管癌根治术中的安全性及可行性。
方法
2
分析广西壮族自治区人民医院心胸外科2015年1月至2016年1月40例接受McKeown食管癌根治术的中下段食管癌患者资料,其中11例行单操作孔胸腔镜联合腹腔镜McKeown食管癌根治术(single-utility incision total endoscopy McKeown esophagectomy
sTEME),29例行三孔胸腔镜腹部开放McKeown食管癌根治术(three-port thoracoscope combined with laparotomy McKeown esophagectomy,tTLME),比较两组的术中情况、手术结果及术后并发症的发生率。
To evaluate the safety and the feasibility of single-utility incision thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy in radical McKeown esophagectomy (sTLME) for esophageal cancer.
Methods
2
Clinical data of 40 patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy in our department from January 2015 to January 2016 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Among the 40 patients
11 patients underwent sTLME
and the other 29 subjects were treated with three-port thoracoscopy combined with laparotomy McKeown esophagectomy (tTLME). The patient's surgery situations
operative outcomes
and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
Results
2
There were no significant differences in thoracic operative time
blood loss and number of lymph node dissection between the sTLME and tTLME groups (
P
>
0.05). But the sTEM group though had a longer abdominal operative time (
P
<
0.05)
it had less blood loss
lower postoperative pain index and shorter length of hospital stay (
P
<
0.05). However
no significant differences were observed in number of abdominal lymph node dissection
post-operative duration for intensive care
occurrence of post-operative complications
and recurrence and metastasis in lymph node within 6 months between the 2 groups (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
sTLME is feasible for middle and lower esophageal cancer. Although it will extend the operation time
but has less surgical trauma
shorter hospital stay and satisfactory short-term outcomes.
关键词
Keywords
references
TORRE L A, BRAY F, SIEGL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2): 87-108. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21262.Epub 2015 Feb 4.
GIUGLIANO D N, BERGER A C, ROSATO E L, et al. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016, 401(6): 747-756. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1469-1.
ZHAI C, LIU Y, LI W, et al. A comparison of short-term outcomes between ivor-lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2015, 7(12): 2352-2358. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439. 2015.12.15.
GAO S, AN Z Y. Control study of the short-term efficacy of Ivor-Lewis and McKeown operation by thoracoscopy and laparoscopy in esophageal squanmous cell carcinma[J]. Chin J Front Med, 2016, 4: 57-60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7372.2016.04.15.
PREDINA J D, MORSE C R. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and its current role in esophageal cancer[J]. Minerva Chir, 2014, 69(6): 363-370.
PHAM T H, PERRY K A, DOLAN J P, et al.Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open ivor-lewis esophagectomy[J]. Am J Surg, 2010, 199(5): 594-598. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.005.
MU J W, GAO S G, XUE Q, et al. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(45): 12873-12881. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12873.
WU H R, XIE M R, LIU C Q, et al.Short-term outcomes of total endoscopy McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol, 2014, 41(20): 1301-1306. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20141083.
ANDEREGG M C, GISBERTZ S S, VAN BERGE HENEGOUWEN M I. Minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2014, 28(1): 41-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.002.
HAMOUDA A H, FORSHAW M J, TSIGRITIS K, et al. Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(4): 865-869. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0679-9.
MAAS K W, CUESTA M A, VAN BERGE HENEGOUWEN M I, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial[J]. World J Surg, 2015, 39(8): 1986-1993. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3100-y.
BIERE S S, VAN BERGE HENEGOUWEN M I, MAAS K W, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9829): 1887-1892. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9.
PETROPOULOS K, MACHERAS A, LIAKAKOS T, et al.Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: techniques and outcomes[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2015, 110(2): 99-108.
SMITHERS BM, GOTLEY DC, MARTIN I, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245(2): 232-240.
PARAMESWARAN R, TITCOMB D R, BLENCOWE N S, et al. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(6): 1970-1977. DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2848-7.
LUKETICH J D, PENNATHUR A, AWAIS O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 256(1): 95-103. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
MA X, GUO W, LI H C, et al.The evaluation of totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with single-utility incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. Inter J Pathol Clin Med, 2014, 34(6): 743-747. DOI: 10.11714/j.issn. 2095-6959.2014.06.021.
KHAN O, NIZAR S, VASILIKOSTAS G, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2012, 4(5): 465-466. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.08.16.
JIANG X X, LIN Z, TAN L J, et al. Laparoscopy in three-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Chin J Mini Invas Surg, 2011, 16(9): 825-828. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2011.09.019.
GUO W, MA X, YANG S, et al.Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy:a meta-analysis of outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(9): 3873-3881. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x.
CAI H R, YU P, ZHOU H, et al.Radical resection of esophagus carcinoma by open versus minimally invasive approaches: a clinical study of 108 cases[J]. J Third Mil Med Univ, 2014, 36(20): 2142-2144.
FANG W M, RUAN W Z, ZHU K S. The application of laparoscopic-assisted modified Ivor-Lewis on esophageal cancer resection[J]. Chin Oncol, 2012, 22(7): 528-532. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2012.07.009.
PARRY K, RUURDA J P, VAN DER SLUIS P C, et al. Current status of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2017, 30(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1111/dote.12477.