The clinical analysis of 5F catheter in coronary angiography

LI Lihua; et al

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.2005.05.041

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

The clinical analysis of 5F catheter in coronary angiography

更新时间：2024-01-17

- The clinical analysis of 5F catheter in coronary angiography
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Issue 5, (2005)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院心内科
  2. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院心内科,重庆,400016
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.2005.05.041
  CLC： R816.2
- Published：2005，
扫描看全文
[1]李骊华,雷寒,马康华,覃数,罗素新.应用5F造影导管行冠状动脉造影术的临床分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2005(05):131-133.

LI Lihua, et al. The clinical analysis of 5F catheter in coronary angiography. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University (5).(2005)
[1]李骊华,雷寒,马康华,覃数,罗素新.应用5F造影导管行冠状动脉造影术的临床分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2005(05):131-133. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.2005.05.041.

LI Lihua, et al. The clinical analysis of 5F catheter in coronary angiography. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University (5).(2005) DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.2005.05.041.

摘要

目的:评价5F造影导管经股动脉径路行冠状动脉造影术的可行性、安全性。方法:对787例行冠状动脉造影的患者进行了回顾分析

根据应用5F及6F造影导管分为两组

分析两组病人的手术成功率、手术操作时间、冠脉压力下降及室颤的发生情况

术后压迫血管时间、卧床时间及穿刺部位血管并发症。结果:5F导管组在手术成功率、手术时间与6F导管组比较无明显差异（P>0.05）。术中冠脉压力下降、室颤、术后压迫血管止血时间、卧床时间、穿刺部位血管并发症较6F导管组明显减少（P<0.05）。结论:应用5F导管行冠状动脉造影与6F导管在手术成功率及手术时间方面相近

由于其容易止血、血管并发症少、卧床时间短、患者痛苦小的优点

可选择应用。

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of 5F catheter in transfemoral coronary angiography.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted among 787 cases that underwent coronary arteriography.They were divided into two groups: 5F or 6F group by using the 5F or 6F catheter.The two groups were contrasted and analyzed in the respect of success rate

operating time

the decrease of coronary artery pressure

ventricular fibrillation

the time to stop bleeding

bedrest time and peripheral vascular complication.Results:No significant differences were observed in the success rate and operating time(P>0.05).But the incidence of the coronary artery pressure decreasing and ventricular fibrillation

the time to stop bleeding

the bedrest time and vessel complication in 5F group were less than those in 6F group(P<0.05).Conclusion:5F catheter has advantages of less vascular complication

easy to stop bleeding

less bedrest time and less pain.Therefore it can be a choice.

关键词

造影导管冠状动脉造影术

Keywords

CatheterCoronary angiography

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰