Clinical application of flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath in treatment of impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm
Urinary system calculi|更新时间:2025-10-22
|
Clinical application of flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath in treatment of impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 49, Issue 6, Pages: 660-664(2024)
Guan Xiaofeng,Zhou Fengchi,Wang Xiang,et al.Clinical application of flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath in treatment of impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2024,49(6):660-664.
Guan Xiaofeng,Zhou Fengchi,Wang Xiang,et al.Clinical application of flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath in treatment of impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2024,49(6):660-664. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003527.
Clinical application of flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath in treatment of impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm
To investigate the safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath in the treatment of impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm,and to summarize related clinical experience.
Methods
2
A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 27 patients with impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm who received flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath in The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2023 to February 2024.
Results
2
A total of 27 patients were enrolled,among whom there were 23 male patients and 4 female patients,with a mean age of (48.4±15.4) years and a mean body mass index of (23.7±3.2) kg/m
2
. Of all 27 patients,19 had ureteral calculi at the left side and 8 had ureteral calculi at the right side. The CT value of stones was (1097.6±268.7) HU. The mean length and width of calculi were (1.8±0.3) cm and (0.9±0.2) cm,respectively. As for the location of calculi,24 patients had upper ureteral calculi,2 had middle ureteral calculi,and 1 had lower ureteral calculi. There were 5 patients with ipsilateral renal calculi and 22 without renal calculi. The mean depth of hydronephrosis was (4.7±1.8) cm. There were 2 patients with negative preoperative urine white blood cells,13 with weakly positive(+) urine white blood cells,7 with positive(++) urine white blood cells,and 5 with strongly positive(+++) urine white blood cells. A total of 25 patients completed flexible ureteroscopy,and 2 patients changed the surgical procedure during surgery,with a mean time of operation of (86.7±46.4) minutes and a mean length of hospital stay of (3.1±1.7) days. The levels of white blood cells and hemog
lobin were (8.0±2.4)×10
9
/L and (135.1±21.4) g/L,respectively,before surgery,and (8.9±2.5)×10
9
/L and (135.9±17.8) g/L,respectively,on day 1 after surgery. Reexamination on day 1 after surgery showed that 22 patients had no residual stones,while 5 had residual stones. The mean body temperature on the day after surgery was (36.2±0.2) ℃,with no clinical manifestations of urinary sepsis.
Conclusion
2
Flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible terminal suction ureteral access sheath is safe and effective in the treatment of impacted ureteral calculi with a diameter of ≥1.5 cm,with a relatively high stone clearance rate and a relatively low incidence rate of complications.
关键词
Keywords
references
Darwish AE , Gadelmoula MM , Abdelkawi IF , et al . Ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy for stones:a prospective study for the incidence and risk factors [J ] . Urol Ann , 2019 , 11 ( 3 ): 276 - 281 .
Moretto S , Saita A , Scoffone CM , et al . Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . World J Urol , 2024 , 42 ( 1 ): 234 .
Zhu CC , Cheng F , Rao T , et al . Clinical efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal stone for treament of upper urinary calculi [J ] . Chin J Urol , 2020 , 41 ( 1 ): 41 - 45 .
Ozkaya F , Sertkaya Z , Karabulut I , et al . The effect of using ureteral access sheath for treatment of impacted ureteral stones at mid-upper part with flexible ureterorenoscopy:a randomized prospective study [J ] . Minerva Urol Nefrol , 2019 , 71 ( 4 ): 413 - 420 .
Wu ZH , Wang YZ , Liu TZ , et al . Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones [J ] . World J Urol , 2022 , 40 ( 9 ): 2347 - 2352 .
Yue P , Sun SW , Wang Y , et al . Predictive value of proximal and distal ureteral diameter ratio for impacted stones in the middle and upper ureter [J ] . Chin J Urol , 2023 , 44 ( 5 ): 347 - 353 .
Legemate JD , Wijnstok NJ , Matsuda T , et al . Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones [J ] . World J Urol , 2017 , 35 ( 10 ): 1497 - 1506 .
Deng T , Chen YW , Liu B , et al . Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones [J ] . World J Urol , 2019 , 37 ( 8 ): 1687 - 1701 .
Wang YX , Chang XL , Li JD , et al . Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10 mm:a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J ] . Int Braz J Urol , 2020 , 46 ( 6 ): 902 - 926 .
Choi JD , Seo SI , Kwon J , et al . Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy vs ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones [J ] . JSLS , 2019 , 23 ( 2 ): e2019 .00008.
Choi YS , Sorkhi SR , Cho HJ , et al . A comparative analysis between flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of >15 mm non-obstructing proximal ureteral stones [J ] . J Clin Med , 2023 , 12 ( 24 ): 7541 .
Rana RS , Ather MH . Hounsfield units-a significant predictor of lasering time and energy in the management of upper urinary tract stones using Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum Garnet lasers [J ] . Int Urol Nephrol , 2020 , 52 ( 9 ): 1637 - 1641 .
Peteinaris A , Pagonis K , Vagionis A , et al . What is the impact of pulse modulation technology,laser settings and intraoperative irrigation conditions on the irrigation fluid temperature during flexible ureteroscopy? An in vivo experiment using artificial stones [J ] . World J Urol , 2022 , 40 ( 7 ): 1853 - 1858 .
Yu Y , Chen YJ , Zhou XC , et al . Comparison of novel flexible and traditional ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery [J ] . World J Urol , 2024 , 42 ( 1 ): 7 .
Zhang ZL , Xie TP , Li FZ , et al . Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi [J ] . World J Urol , 2023 , 41 ( 12 ): 3619 - 3627 .
Yuan Q , Tang W . Clinical study of intelligent pressure controlled negative pressure suction flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal cast stones [J ] . J Chongqing Med Univ , 2022 , 47 ( 9 ): 1065 - 1068 .
Tonyali S , Yilmaz M , Tzelves L , et al . Predictors of ureteral strictures after retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of impacted ureteral stones:a systematic literature review [J ] . J Clin Med , 2023 , 12 ( 10 ): 3603 .
Ulvik O , Harneshaug JR , Gjengsto P . Ureteral strictures following ureteroscopic stone treatment [J ] . J Endourol , 2021 , 35 ( 7 ): 985 - 990 .
Efficacy and safety of one-stage flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy without ureteral access sheath or ureteral stent in treatment of upper ureteral calculi and renal calculi with a long diameter of ≤10 mm
Comparison of the efficacy of three surgical procedures for kidney stones with diameter>2 cm
Safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscope for renal calculus in patients with solitary kidney
In vitro study of intrapelvic pressures using retrograde ureteroscope lithotripsy
Related Author
Wang Delin
Huang Guohua
Lan Jianhua
Zhang Jindong
Su Shuai
Wang Delin
Huang Guohua
Peng Yueqiang
Related Institution
Department of Urology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University
Department of Urology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University