A clinical study of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization as the pretreatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy

Cai Yiling; Zhao Hu; Zhou Zhiyi; Hou Qiannan; Zhou Shenglan; Jing Huaibo

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003426

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A clinical study of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization as the pretreatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy

Clinical research | 更新时间：2025-10-22

- A clinical study of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization as the pretreatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Vol. 49, Issue 2, Pages: 188-192(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.电子科技大学医学院附属妇女儿童医院·成都市妇女儿童中心医院妇科，成都 611731
  2.四川大学华西第二医院妇产科，成都　610041
  3.电子科技大学医学院附属妇女儿童医院·成都市妇女儿童中心医院介入科，成都 611731
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003426
  CLC： R71
- Received：08 October 2023，
  
  Revised：2023-11-16，
  
  Accepted：20 January 2024，
  
  Published：28 February 2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
蔡一铃,赵虎,周芷伊,等.腹主动脉球囊阻断与子宫动脉栓塞作为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术前预处理的临床研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2024,49(2):188-192.

Cai Yiling,Zhao Hu,Zhou Zhiyi,et al.A clinical study of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization as the pretreatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2024,49(2):188-192.
蔡一铃,赵虎,周芷伊,等.腹主动脉球囊阻断与子宫动脉栓塞作为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术前预处理的临床研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2024,49(2):188-192. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003426.

Cai Yiling,Zhao Hu,Zhou Zhiyi,et al.A clinical study of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization as the pretreatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2024,49(2):188-192. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003426.

摘要

目的

对比腹主动脉球囊阻断与子宫动脉栓塞作为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠（cesarean scar pregnancy，CSP）术前预处理的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月成都市妇女儿童中心医院收治的临床和影像学确诊并在治疗前行预处理的CSP患者104例，其中47例患者在手术治疗前采用腹主动脉球囊阻断，57例患者在手术治疗前采用子宫动脉栓塞（uterine artery embolization，UAE）。

结果

2组患者基本情况及治疗效果差异无统计学意义（

0.05）。2组患者在住院费用、介入术后疼痛、X线透视下介入操作辐射时间和体表辐射剂量、术后月经改变差异有统计学意义（

0.034）。

结论

腹主动脉球囊阻断和UAE作为CSP术前预处理均可有效控制CSP患者术中出血，相较于UAE使医务人员及患者接受辐射的时间和辐射剂量减少，患者无严重盆腔痛，术后出现月经量及闭经的并发症减少，未发现对子宫和卵巢功能的近期影响，但是价格相对较高。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus uterine artery embolization（UAE） as the pretreatment for cesarean scar pregnancy（CSP）.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed for 104 patients with CSP who were admitted to Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 and were diagnosed based on clinical and radiological examinations，among whom 47 received abdominal aortic balloon occlusion before surgery and 57 received UAE before surgery.

Results

There were no significant differences in general information and treatment outcome between the two groups（

0.05）. There were significant differences between the two groups in hospital costs，pain after interventional surgery，duration of interventional radiation and body surface radiation dose under X-ray fluoroscopy，and postoperative menstrual changes（

0.05）.

Conclusion

Both abdominal aortic balloon occlusion and UAE can effectively control intraoperative bleeding as the pretreatment for CSP，and compared with UAE，abdominal aortic balloon occlusion significantly reduces the duration and dose of radiation for both medical staff and patients，with no severe pelvic pain and a few postoperative complications such as the reduction in menstrual volume and amenorrhea. Abdominal aortic balloon occlusion has no near-term effect on uterine and ovarian function，but with a relatively high price.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华医学会妇产科学分会计划生育学组 . 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识（2016） [J ] . 中华妇产科杂志， 2016 ， 51 （ 8 ）： 568 - 572 ．

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of uterine scar pregnancy after cesarean section in the Family Planning Group of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association （ 2016 ）[J ] . Chin J Obstet Gynecol， 2016 ， 51 （ 8 ）： 568 - 572 ．

向　阳 . 关于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的分型与治疗方法的选择 [J ] . 中国妇产科临床杂志， 2012 ， 13 （ 6 ）： 401 - 404 ．

Xiang Y . Classification and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy [J ] . Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol ， 2012 ， 13 （ 6 ）： 401 - 404 ．

袁岩，戴晴，蔡胜，等 . 超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断的诊断价值 [J ] . 中华超声影像学杂志， 2010 ， 19 （ 4 ）： 321 - 324 .

Yuan Y ， Dai Qg ， Cai S ， et al . The diagnostic value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy [J ] Chinese Journal of Ultrasound Imaging ， 2010 ， 19 （ 4 ）： 321 - 324 .

Birch Petersen K ， Hoffmann E ， Rifbjerg Larsen C ， et al . Cesarean scar pregnancy：a systematic review of treatment studies [J ] . Fertil Steril ， 2016 ， 105 （ 4 ）： 958 - 967 ．

陈春林，刘　萍 . 血管性介入治疗在妇产科应用的优势及可能的缺憾 [J ] . 中国实用妇科与产科杂志， 2007 ， 23 （ 8 ）： 594 - 596 ．

Chen CL ， Liu P . Advantages and possible disadvantages of vascular interventional therapy in obstetrics and gynecology [J ] . Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet ， 2007 ， 23 （ 8 ）： 594 - 596 ．

马　奔，曾北蓝，陈春林，等 . 子宫动脉栓塞术后闭经的影响因素分析 [J ] . 妇产与遗传（电子版）， 2012 ， 2 （ 1 ）： 24 - 27 ．

Ma B ， Zeng BL ， Chen CL ， et al . Influential factor of amenorrhea after uterine arterial embdization [J ] . Obstet Gynecol Genet Electron Ed ， 2012 ， 2 （ 1 ）： 24 - 27 ．

关　琦，张珊珊，张化莲，等 . 腹主动脉球囊阻断术联合子宫重塑术对凶险性前置胎盘并发胎盘植入患者产后出血、子宫切除的影响及安全性分析 [J ] . 中国妇产科临床杂志， 2021 ， 22 （ 3 ）： 309 - 310 ．

Guan Q ， Zhang SS ， Zhang HL ， et al . Effect and safety analysis of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion combined with uterine remodeling on postpartum hemorrhage and hysterectomy in patients with dangerous placenta previa complicated with placenta implantation [J ] . Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol ， 2021 ， 22 （ 3 ）： 309 - 310 ．

王　乔，赵　霞 . 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的介入治疗及疗效评价 [J ] . 实用妇产科杂志， 2014 ， 30 （ 4 ）： 245 - 247 ．

Wang Q ， Zhao X . Interventional treatment and curative effect evaluation of cesarean scar pregnancy [J ] . J Pract Obstet Gynecol ， 2014 ， 30 （ 4 ）： 245 - 247 ．

刘　传，赵先兰，刘　彩，等 . 腹主动脉球囊阻断在凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入剖宫产术中的应用 [J ] . 实用妇产科杂志， 2016 ， 32 （ 3 ）： 204 - 207 ．

Zhao XL ， Liu C ， et al . The application of temporary ballon occlusion of the abdominal aorta in patients w ith pernicious placenta previa and placenta accreta [J ] . J Pract Obstet Gynecol ， 2016 ， 32 （ 3 ）： 204 - 207 ．

马文琴，赵丹梅，李　咏，等 . B超引导下吸宫和选择性宫腔水囊压迫用于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗的可行性探讨 [J ] . 实用妇产科杂志， 2014 ， 30 （ 10 ）： 794 - 796 ．

Ma WQ ， Zhao DM ， Li Y ， et al . Feasibility of B-ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration and selective uterine cavity water sac compression in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy [J ] . J Pract Obstet Gynecol ， 2014 ， 30 （ 10 ）： 794 - 796 ．

张建好，段鸿鉴，赵艳萍，等 . 腹主动脉球囊阻断术在剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠清宫手术中的应用初步分析 [J ] . 中华妇产科杂志， 2020 ， 55 （ 8 ）： 516 - 520 ．

Zhang JH ， Duan HJ ， Zhao YP ， et al . Preliminary study on the application of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy [J ] . Chin J Obstet Gynecol ， 2020 ， 55 （ 8 ）： 516 - 520 ．

李坪芬，王渠源 . 子宫动脉栓塞术在子宫瘢痕妊娠治疗中的利弊 [J ] . 国际妇产科学杂志， 2019 ， 46 （ 3 ）： 297 - 300 ．

Li PF ， Wang QY . The advantages and disadvantages of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine scar pregnancy [J ] . J Int Obstet Gynecol ， 2019 ， 46 （ 3 ）： 297 - 300 ．

Masamoto H ， Uehara H ， Gibo M ， et al . Elective use of aortic balloon occlusion in cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa percreta [J ] . Gynecol Obstet Invest ， 2009 ， 67 （ 2 ）： 92 - 95 ．

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

The clinical value of Foley bladder in the treatment of the cesarean scar pregnancy

Etiology and treatment progress of cesarean scar pregnancy

Related Author

SUN Wen-jie

et al

李莉

魏俊

Chen Mingqian

Related Institution

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University/Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children

⁰