Influencing factors for trial of labor after cesarean section in women becoming pregnant again

Chen Shu; Zhou Wei; Yang Yunping; Wei Linna; Xu Yuchan; Li Li

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003373

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Influencing factors for trial of labor after cesarean section in women becoming pregnant again

Clinical research | 更新时间：2025-10-22

- Influencing factors for trial of labor after cesarean section in women becoming pregnant again
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Vol. 48, Issue 11, Pages: 1356-1362(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院/重庆市妇幼保健院妇产科，重庆　400021
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003373
  CLC： R714.3
- Received：25 June 2023，
  
  Revised：2023-10-05，
  
  Accepted：11 October 2023，
  
  Published：28 November 2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈述,周玮,杨赟萍,等.剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产影响因素探讨[J].重庆医科大学学报,2023,48(11):1356-1362.

Chen Shu,Zhou Wei,Yang Yunping,et al.Influencing factors for trial of labor after cesarean section in women becoming pregnant again[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2023,48(11):1356-1362.
陈述,周玮,杨赟萍,等.剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产影响因素探讨[J].重庆医科大学学报,2023,48(11):1356-1362. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003373.

Chen Shu,Zhou Wei,Yang Yunping,et al.Influencing factors for trial of labor after cesarean section in women becoming pregnant again[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2023,48(11):1356-1362. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003373.

摘要

目的

探讨剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩（vaginal birth after cesarean section，VBAC）成功率的影响因素，指导剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产（trial of labor after cesarean，TOLAC）临床决策，提高VBAC成功率，减少不良母婴结局的发生。

方法

回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年10月于重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院（重庆市妇幼保健院）产科中心TOLAC孕妇共452例，其中VBAC孕妇342例，TOLAC失败孕妇110例，根据最终分娩方式从各随机选取110例孕妇分为VBAC组和TOLAC失败组。采用单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析VBAC的影响因素，并比较2组孕产妇的妊娠结局。

结果

①总体VBAC率为75.67%（342/452），TOLAC失败率为24.33%（110/452）。②产前影响因素单因素分析发现，VBAC组与TOLAC失败组孕妇的孕周分别为（38.44±2.13）、（38.96±1.34）周，既往因不良孕产

史行引产分别为11.82%、2.80%，存在妊娠合并症为32.73%、20.56%，比较差异有统计学意义（均

0.05）。入院时宫颈Bishop评分（5.15±1.69、3.71±1.52），既往阴道分娩史（32.73%、20.56%），自然临产（86.36%、17.76%）分别比较，差异也有统计学意义（均

0.001）。③母婴妊娠结局单因素分析发现，新生儿体质量分别为（3 191.82±489.00）、（3 334.15±375.9） g，产后24 h出血量分别为（408.75±142.31）、（560.85±168.61） mL，VBAC组均低于TOLAC失败组，差异有统计学意义（均

0.05）。TOLAC失败组中有7例不全子宫破裂。2 组妊娠结局中输血、产褥感染、新生儿5 min Apgar评分的分别比较，差异无统计学意义。无孕产妇及围产儿死亡病例。④多因素Logistic回归分析显示，入院时宫颈Bishop评分（

=0.122，95%CI=0.010~1.441）、既往阴道分娩史（

=0.034，95%CI=1.297~715.194）、早产（

=186.54，95%CI=2.225~15 638.578）及自然临产（

=52.37，95%CI=8.949~306.517）均是VBAC的影响因素。

结论

VBAC的影响因素为孕妇的孕周、既往阴道分娩分娩史、既往因不良孕产史引产、存在妊娠合并症、入院时宫颈Bishop评分、自然临产、早产史。VBAC组产后24 h出血量低于TOLAC失败组。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the influencing factors for the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section（VBAC），to guide clinical decision-making for trial of labor after cesarean section（TOLAC），and to improve the success rate of VBAC and reduce the occurrence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed for 452 pregnant women who experienced TOLAC in Obstetrics Center of Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University（Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children） from January 2020 to October 2022，among whom 342 experienced VBAC and 110 experienced failed TOLAC. According to the final mode of delivery，110 pregnant women were selected as VBAC group，and 110 were selected as failed TOLAC group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to investigate the influencing factors for VBAC，and pregnancy outcome was compared between the two groups.

Results

In this study，the overall VBAC rate was 75.67%（342/452），and the TOLAC failure rate was 24.33%（110/452）. The

univariate analysis of prenatal factors showed that there were significant differences between the VBAC group and the failed TOLAC group in gestational age（38.44±2.13 weeks vs. 38.96±1.34 weeks，

0.05） and the proportion of pregnant women with induction of labor due to the history of abnormal pregnancy（11.82% vs. 2.80%，

0.05） or pregnancy comorbidities（32.73% vs. 20.56%，

0.05），and there were also significant differences between the two groups in cervical Bishop score on admission（5.15±1.69 vs. 3.71±1.52，

0.001），the proportion of women with a history of vaginal delivery（32.73% vs. 20.56%，

0.001），and the proportion of women with spontaneous delivery（86.36% vs. 17.76%，

0.001）. The univariate analysis of maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes showed that compared with the failed TOLAC group，the VBAC group had a significantly lower body weight of neonates（3 191.82±489.00 g vs. 3 334.15±375.99 g，

0.05） and significantly lower blood loss within 24 hours after delivery（408.75±142.31 mL vs. 560.85±168.61 mL，

0.05）.］There were 7 patients with incomplete uterine rupture in the failed TOLAC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in blood transfusion，puerperal infection，and 5-minute Apgar score of neonates. There was no death of pregnant and parturient women or perinatal infants. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that cervical Bishop score on admission（odds ratio ［

］=0.122，95%CI： 0.010-1.441），history of vaginal delivery（

=0.034，95%CI： 1.297-715.194），premature delivery（

=186.54，95%CI： 2.225-15638.578），and spontaneous labor（

=52.37，95%CI： 8.949-306.517） were influencing factors for VBAC.

Conclusion

Gestational weeks，history of vaginal delivery，history of induction of labor due to abnormal pregnancy，pregnancy comorbidities，cervical Bishop score on admission，spontaneous labor，and history of premature delivery are influencing factors for VBAC. The VBAC group has lower blood loss within 24 hours after delivery than the failed TOLAC group.

关键词

Keywords

references

Qiu LL ， Zhu JJ ， Lu XY . The safety of trial of labor after cesarean section（TOLAC） versus elective repeat cesarean section（ERCS）：a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ， 2023 ， 36 （ 1 ）： 2214831 ．

Chu SY ， Zhang YT ， Jiang YR ， et al . Cesarean section without medical indication and risks of childhood allergic disorder，attenuated by breastfeeding [J ] . Sci Rep ， 2017 ， 7 （ 1 ）： 9762 ．

Grobman WA ， Lai YL ， Landon MB ， et al . Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? [J ] . Am J Perinatol ， 2009 ， 26 （ 10 ）： 693 - 701 ．

Young CB ， Liu SL ， Muraca GM ， et al . Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth，and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity [J ] . J De L'association Med Can ， 2018 ， 190 （ 18 ）： E556 - E564 ．

Kamath BD ， Todd JK ， Glazner JE ， et al . Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery [J ] . Obstet Gynecol ， 2009 ， 113 （ 6 ）： 1231 - 1238 ．

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 184 [J ] . Obstet Gynecol ， 2017 ，（ 5 ）： 217 - 233 .

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . Obstetric care consensus no. 1： Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery [J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol ， 2014 ， 210 （ 3 ）： 693 - 711 .

中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组 . 剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩管理的专家共识（2016） [J ] . 中华妇产科杂志， 2016 ， 51 （ 8 ）： 561 - 564 ．

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology，Chinese Medical Association . Expert consensus on management of vaginal delivery after cesarean section（2016） [J ] . Chin J Obstet Gynecol ， 2016 ， 51 （ 8 ）： 561 - 564 ．

Martel MJ ， MacKinnon CJ . No. 155-guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth [J ] . J Obstet Gynaecol Can ， 2018 ， 40 （ 3 ）： e195 - e207 ．

Arnold KC ， Flint CJ . Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery [M ] // Obstetrics Essentials . Cham ： Springer ， 2017 ： 115 - 121 ．

刘兴会，马宏伟，张　彦 . 控制剖宫产率从减少阴道分娩并发症做起 [J ] . 中国实用妇科与产科杂志， 2022 ， 38 （ 8 ）： 769 - 772 ．

Liu XH ， Ma HW ， Zhang Y . To control cesarean section rate starting from reducing complications of vaginal delivery [J ] . Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet ， 2022 ， 38 （ 8 ）： 769 - 772 ．

Basile Ibrahim B ， Kennedy HP ， Whittemore R . Women’s perceptions of barriers and facilitators to vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States：an integrative review [J ] . J Midwifery Womens Health ， 2020 ， 65 （ 3 ）： 349 - 361 ．

Bruno AM ， Allshouse AA ， Metz TD . Trends in attempted and successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States from 2010 to 2020 [J ] . Obstet Gynecol ， 2023 ， 141 （ 1 ）： 173 - 175 ．

Takeya A ， Adachi E ， Takahashi Y ， et al . Trial of labor after cesarean delivery（TOLAC） in Japan：rates and complications [J ] . Arch Gynecol Obstet ， 2020 ， 301 （ 4 ）： 995 - 1001 ．

Lee DS ， Tandel MD ， Kwan L ， et al . Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate [J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ， 2022 ， 4 （ 2 ）： 100534 ．

Gluck O ， Tairy D ， Bar J ， et al . The impact of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome in preterm births [J ] . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ， 2021 ， 34 （ 8 ）： 1183 - 1189 ．

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Influence of cytoplasmic strings during blastocyst expansion on embryonic development and pregnancy outcome

Analysis of therapeutic effect of laparoscopic cervical cerclage and transvaginal cervical cerclage in patients with cervical incompetence during pregnancy

Application of psychological counseling in infertile women

The pregnancy outcome in patients with hydrosalpingx in IVF-ET

Related Author

Gao Yang

Han Wei

Huang Guoning

Xiong Shun

Wang Jiang

Zou Jiayi

Zhu Jiahong

Wang Min

Related Institution

Center for Reproductive Medicine，Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children，Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Human Embryo Engineering，Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children

The Affiliated Maternity Hospital of Jiangnan University，Gynaecology and Obstetrics

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the Second Affiliated Hospital,Chongqing Medical University

重庆市妇幼保健院

⁰