川北医学院附属医院泌尿外科,南充 637000
Received:16 March 2023,
Revised:2023-05-18,
Accepted:12 June 2023,
Published:28 August 2023
移动端阅览
李俊洋,余晓东,吕宗应,等.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后神经侵犯阳性的影响因素分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2023,48(8):945-948.
Li Junyang,Yu Xiaodong,Zongying Lü,et al.Influencing factors for positive perineural invasion after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2023,48(8):945-948.
李俊洋,余晓东,吕宗应,等.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后神经侵犯阳性的影响因素分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2023,48(8):945-948. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003290.
Li Junyang,Yu Xiaodong,Zongying Lü,et al.Influencing factors for positive perineural invasion after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J].Journal of Chongqing Medical University,2023,48(8):945-948. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003290.
目的
2
分析腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后病理标本神经侵犯阳性的影响因素。
方法
2
回顾2018年1月至2023年3月于川北医学院附属医院泌尿外科行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的104例患者临床资料,收集患者年龄、吸烟史、饮酒史、术前总前列腺特异性抗原(total prostate-specific antigen,TPSA)、术前游离前列腺特异性抗原(free prostate-specific antigen,FPSA)/总前列腺特异性抗原比值(F/T比值)、术后病理Gleason评分、包膜侵犯情况、神经侵犯情况、切缘情况、精囊侵犯情况、病理T分期,根据术后病理结果分为神经侵犯阳性组和神经侵犯阴性组。比较2组患者的年龄、吸烟史、饮酒史、术前TPSA、术前F/T比值、术后病理Gleason评分、包膜侵犯情况、切缘情况、精囊侵犯情况、病理T分期,采用卡方检验和多因素logistic回归分析分别对变量进行分析,探寻神经侵犯阳性的影响因素。
结果
2
本研究总共纳入104例患者,其中神经侵犯阳性患者30例,约占28.85%,神经侵犯阴性患者74例,约占71.15%。所有患者术后病理结果均证实为前列腺癌。单因素分析结果显示,患者年龄、F/T比值、Gleason评分、包膜侵犯、切缘阳性、精囊侵犯、病理T分期比较差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。吸烟史、饮酒史、术前TPSA比较差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。将具有统计学意义的指标纳入多因素logistic回归分析,结果
显示年龄
<
70岁和切缘阳性是腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后神经侵犯阳性的独立影响因素(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
年龄、F/T比值、Gleason评分、包膜侵犯、切缘阳性、精囊侵犯、病理T分期与腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后神经侵犯阳性存在显著相关。其中,年龄<70岁和切缘阳性是腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后神经侵犯阳性的独立危险因素。
Objective
2
To analyze the influencing factors for positive perineural invasion in pathological specimens after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Methods
2
The clinical data of 104 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Department of Urology of the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient’s age,smoking history,drinking history,preoperative total prostate-specific antigen(TPSA),ratio of preoperative free prostate-specific antigen/TPSA(F/T ratio),postoperative pathological Gleason score,capsular invasion,perineural invasion,resection margin,seminal vesicle invasion,and pathological T stage were collected. According to the postoperative pathological results,the patients were divided into two groups: positive perineural invasion group and negative perineural invasion group. The age,smoking history,drinking history,preoperative TPSA,preoperative F/T ratio,postoperative pathological Gleason score,capsular invasion,resection margin,seminal vesicle invasion,and pathological T stage were compared between the two groups. The chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the variables to explore the influencing factors for positive perineural invasion.
Results
2
A total of 104 patients were included in this study,including 30 patients with positive perineural invasion(28.85%) and 74 patients with negative perineural invasion(71.15%). All patients were confirmed to have prostate cancer by postoperative pathological results. Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age,F/T ratio,Gleason
score,capsular invasion,positive resection margin,seminal vesicle invasion,and pathological T stage(
P
<
0.05),and that there were no significant differences in smoking history,drinking history,and preoperative TPSA(
P
>
0.05). The statistically significant indices were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis,and the results showed that age
<
70 years and positive resection margin were independent influencing factors for positive perineural invasion after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Age,F/T ratio,Gleason score,capsular invasion,positive resection margin,seminal vesicle invasion,and pathological T stage are significantly related to positive perineural invasion after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Among them,age <70 years and positive resection margin are independent risk factors for positive perineural invasion after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Siegel RL , Miller KD , Jemal A . Cancer statistics,2015 [J ] . CA , 2015 , 65 ( 1 ): 5 - 29 .
Schaeffer EM , Srinivas S , Adra N , et al . NCCN guidelines ® insights:prostate cancer,version 1.2023 [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2022 , 20 ( 12 ): 1288 - 1298 .
Niu YQ , Förster S , Muders M . The role of perineural invasion in prostate cancer and its prognostic significance [J ] . Cancers , 2022 , 14 ( 17 ): 4065 .
王峰岩 . 前列腺癌肿瘤细胞侵犯周围神经与临床病理特征及预后的关系 [J ] . 中国卫生工程学 , 2021 , 20 ( 5 ): 875 - 876 .
Wang FY . Relationship between tumor cells invading peripheral nerves and clinicopathological features and prognosis of prostate cancer [J ] . Chin J Public Heath Eng , 2021 , 20 ( 5 ): 875 - 876 .
Zhang LJ , Wu B , Zha ZL , et al . Perineural invasion as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy:a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J ] . BMC Urol , 2018 , 18 ( 1 ): 5 .
Ayala GE , Dai H , Ittmann M , et al . Growth and survival mechanisms associated with perineural invasion in prostate cancer [J ] . Cancer Res , 2004 , 64 ( 17 ): 6082 - 6090 .
Kang MY , Oh JJ , Lee S , et al . Perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion are associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2016 , 23 ( 8 ): 2699 - 2706 .
Stankovic M , Wolff L , Wieder T , et al . Perineural invasion as predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following open radical prostatectomy:a single-center experience [J ] . World J Urol , 2022 , 40 ( 11 ): 2695 - 2700 .
DeLancey JO , Jr Wood DP , He C , et al . Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy [J ] . Urology , 2013 , 81 ( 2 ): 354 - 357 .
Zhao J , Chen J , Zhang M , et al . The clinical significance of perineural invasion in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer [J ] . Andrology , 2019 , 7 ( 2 ): 184 - 192 .
Brassell SA , Rice KR , Parker PM , et al . Prostate cancer in men 70 years old or older,indolent or aggressive:clinicopathological analysis and outcomes [J ] . J Urol , 2011 , 185 ( 1 ): 132 - 137 .
Godoy G , Tareen BU , Lepor H . Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J ] . BJU Int , 2009 , 104 ( 11 ): 1610 - 1614 .
Li H , Chang XF , Du YQ . Perineural invasion detected in prostate biopsy is a predictor of positive surgical margin of radical prostatectomy specimen:a Meta-analysis [J ] . Andrologia , 2022 , 54 ( 5 ): e14395 .
孙颖浩 . 我国前列腺癌的研究现状 [J ] . 中华泌尿外科杂志 , 2004 , 25 ( 2 ): 77 - 80 .
Sun YH . Research status of prostate cancer in China [J ] . Chin J Urol , 2004 , 25 ( 2 ): 77 - 80 .
夏晶晶 . TRUS引导前列腺活检组织中前列腺癌神经侵犯的相关因素分析 [D ] . 昆明 : 昆明医科大学 , 2019 .
Xia JJ . Analysis of related factors of TRUS-guided prostate cancer neurological invasion in prostate biopsy [D ] . Kunming : Kunming Medical University , 2019 .
李亚朋 , 曹凤宏 , 李晓强 . t-PSA和f/t-PSA对前列腺癌的诊断意义及其与Gleason评分的相关性分析 [J ] . 现代医药卫生 , 2016 , 32 ( 4 ): 492 - 493,496 .
Li YP , Cao FH , Li XQ . Significance of t-PSA and f/t-PSA in diagnosis of prostatic cancer and analysis on their correlation with Gleason score [J ] . J Mod Med Heath , 2016 , 32 ( 4 ): 492 - 493,496 .
张 磊 , 洪宝发 . 血清总前列腺特异抗原及其F/T比值对前列腺癌诊断价值的研究 [J ] . 中华保健医学杂志 , 2009 , 11 ( 2 ): 134 - 136 .
Zhang L , Hong BF . Significance of serum PSA,F-PSA/T-PSA ratio in diagnosis of prostate cancer [J ] . Chin J Heath Care Med , 2009 , 11 ( 2 ): 134 - 136 .
郭潇繁 , 许海楠 , 张晓宇 , 等 . 总前列腺特异性抗原为4~10 ng/mL时血清游离前列腺特异性抗原/总前列腺特异性抗原用于前列腺癌诊断的系统评价 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2010 , 10 ( 10 ): 1164 - 1168 .
Guo XF , Xu HN , Zhang XY , et al . Systematic evaluation of serum free prostate specific antigen/total prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer when total prostate specific antigen is 4-10 ng/mL [J ] . Chinese Journal of evidence-based Medicine , 2010 , 10 ( 10 ): 1164 - 1168 .
Humphrey PA . Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate [J ] . Mod Pathol , 2004 , 17 ( 3 ): 292 - 306 .
Guo XF , Xu HN , Zhang XY , et al . The accuracy off/t-PSA for diagnosing prostate cancer with at-PSA level of 4-10 ng/mL:a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J ] . Chin J Evid Based Med , 2010 , 10 ( 10 ): 1164 - 1168 .
de la Calle CM , Mamawala MM , Landis P , et al . Clinical significance of perineural invasion in men with grade group 1 prostate cancer on active surveillance [J ] . J Urol , 2023 , 209 ( 1 ): 180 - 186 .
Zareba P , Flavin R , Isikbay M , et al . Perineural invasion and risk of lethal prostate cancer [J ] . Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev , 2017 , 26 ( 5 ): 719 - 726 .
Karsiyakali N , Bulent Ozgen M , Ozveren B , et al . The association between perineural invasion in mpMRI-targeted and/or systematic prostate biopsy and adverse pathological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J ] . Actas Urol Esp , 2022 , 46 ( 6 ): 377 - 384 .
Teramoto Y , Numbere N , Wang Y , et al . Clinical significance of perineural invasion by prostate cancer detected on needle core biopsy [J ] . Am J Clin Pathol , 2023 , 159 ( 2 ): 116 - 119 .
0
Views
5
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
